TurboDodge.com MarketPlace Shelby Registry Contact Us

Advertisement - Remove these ads today by clicking here.
 

Go Back   TurboDodge.Com - Turbo Dodge forum for Turbo Mopars, Shelbys, Daytona, SRT-4, PT Cruiser, Omni and more! > Turbo specific > 2.4l Turbo

2.4l Turbo Discussion of the 2.4l turbo in the SRT-4 and PT Cruiser.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools

Old 04-12-2006, 09:53 PM   #1
This will end the IC debait 100%  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: 2 hours north of Pit. PA (Clarion)

My Ride: 2003 Silver SRT-4
Engine: 2.4
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 612
Feedback: (0)
http://www.aeroforcetech.com/SRT4tech.html

Now if someone used this gage and did the intire FMIC swap. Same day, at operation temp this should prove what IC is the best IC and what are the cooling temps.

RPM
MPH
Intake Air Temperature
Engine Coolant Temperature
Injector Pulse Width in msec.
Long Term Fuel Trim
Short Term Fuel Trim
O2 Sensor Voltage
Manifold Pressure (vacuum/boost)displayed in PSI
Ignition Advance
Knock Retard
Throttle Position Percentage
Engine Load
2 user configurable analog inputs**
FrankNbeans is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2006, 06:54 AM   #2
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lorain, Ohio

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 560
Feedback: (0)
I see your in on the group buy.
I expect a full report!
Keith Alto is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2006, 09:36 AM   #3
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Abington, PA (Philly)

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 908
Feedback: (0)
nice, this is exactly what I'm looking for. I may end up buying a couple at some point.
Oni Snake is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2006, 01:28 PM   #4
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: 2 hours north of Pit. PA (Clarion)

My Ride: 2003 Silver SRT-4
Engine: 2.4
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 612
Feedback: (0)
Yeah.. i will see what i can do... Want to compile some numbers up and get an average on everything. This would be 100% effective to find out what one is the best IC. No way you can dispute these numbers.
FrankNbeans is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2006, 07:06 PM   #5
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lorain, Ohio

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 560
Feedback: (0)
Actually I'm not so concerned with the IC's, just how well the guages work.
Keith Alto is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2006, 02:56 AM   #6
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: 2 hours north of Pit. PA (Clarion)

My Ride: 2003 Silver SRT-4
Engine: 2.4
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 612
Feedback: (0)
I am sure the gauges will work just fine. He has done them for GM cars already. Really all it is, is a DAB tool shuved in a gauge pod. Plugs right into the port.... really can't see it going wrong.
FrankNbeans is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2006, 11:18 AM   #7
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: north NJ

My Ride: 05 SRT-4, 98 S70 T5
Engine: A855, B5234T3
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 185
Feedback: (0)
I'm tired of seeing people trying to determine what intercooler is better by using a chassis dyno. At least now air intake temps can be logged in a real driving scenario.
njshift is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2006, 10:30 AM   #8
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Alliance, OH

My Ride: 86 GLHS #163
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 948
Feedback: (1)
Images: 123
Quote:
Originally Posted by FrankNbeans
This would be 100% effective to find out what one is the best IC. No way you can dispute these numbers.
Not really, because there are many other factors other then just intake air temp. There's things like pressure drop, CFM(how much air it can flow), and so on. Furthermore, things like boost pressure and ambient air will also effect the intake air temp.

The correct way to end the intercooler debate is to take them all, one of each, and gather data in a wind tunnel where you can control the variables. They would all be working in the same temp, same humidity, with the same charge air temp and same charge air pressure. Then you could monitor exit temps, pressure drop, and CFM all at once, and then compare.
sy2206 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2006, 11:02 AM   #9
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: New Jersey

My Ride: 86 SC & 98 Neon
1/4: 9.900

Posts: 1,475
Feedback: (0)
Although I'm building a SRT 2.4 motor for my Neon race car, I'm not up on SRT4 IC options.

With that said, the best IC is not necesarily the one that cools best. If it restricts flow but cools really well, then it's not better.

I've found that the most important factor about ICs is heat soak. If you have a massive IC and precool it with a fan, it will stay relatively cool while you're under throttle (at least for some period of time). It's more important (especially for drag racing) to dedicate a fan to pre-cooling the IC. If you have a really good IC that is heat soaked to the temperature of the engine compartment, you will not get much cooling effect from any IC.

The next important issue when choosing an IC is to make sure it does not restrict flow.
DblTrbl is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2006, 11:25 AM   #10
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: www.TurboDodge.com

My Ride: 1986 Plymouth Horizo
Engine: 2.2 Turbo
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 11.705

Posts: 2,548
Feedback: (0)
How will this device read boost properly if the MAP sensor has been changed to a 3 bar, or a MAP clamp is being used?
contraption22 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2006, 03:24 PM   #11
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: 2 hours north of Pit. PA (Clarion)

My Ride: 2003 Silver SRT-4
Engine: 2.4
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 612
Feedback: (0)
not sure.. have to talk to the guys making htem.
FrankNbeans is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2006, 08:03 PM   #12
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Southern Maryland

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 821
Feedback: (0)
Since it reads off the OBD info feed, not raw sensor data, it should be fine, Mike.
what voltage the PCM reads should be irrelevant, it'll output that data in normal form.
GLHS837 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2006, 11:18 PM   #13
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: www.TurboDodge.com

My Ride: 1986 Plymouth Horizo
Engine: 2.2 Turbo
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 11.705

Posts: 2,548
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by GLHS837
Since it reads off the OBD info feed, not raw sensor data, it should be fine, Mike.
what voltage the PCM reads should be irrelevant, it'll output that data in normal form.

Ok I understand. So if if the car is upgraded to S2 or S3, it will still read correctly, however to those using MAP clamps, it will be innacurate.
contraption22 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2006, 06:00 AM   #14
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Southern Maryland

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 821
Feedback: (0)
Yep, GIGO
GLHS837 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2006, 07:39 PM   #15
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lorain, Ohio

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 560
Feedback: (0)
I've been thinking.
Where are you mounting this guage?
Does somebody make a single guage pod?
I don't think I'd use any more guages than this one.
Keith Alto is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

» Quick Nav
- Home
- Classifieds
- Timeslips
- Gallery
- Vendors
-- Directory
- Tech Articles
- Donate
Sponsors
remove ads

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1
Credit Cards | Mobile Phone deals | Equity Release | Mortgage Calculator | Credit Cards UK


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:21 AM.

Page generated in 0.46059 seconds with 13 queries