TurboDodge.com MarketPlace Shelby Registry Contact Us

Advertisement - Remove these ads today by clicking here.
 

Go Back   TurboDodge.Com - Turbo Dodge forum for Turbo Mopars, Shelbys, Daytona, SRT-4, PT Cruiser, Omni and more! > Turbo specific > 2.4l Turbo

2.4l Turbo Discussion of the 2.4l turbo in the SRT-4 and PT Cruiser.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-27-2009, 12:14 PM   #16
Re: I Think "Caliber" needs to be added.  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Jacksonville, Fl

My Ride: '88 Shelby Z TII
Engine: 2.2 TII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 14.284

Posts: 4,543
Feedback: (0)
So tell me how a heavier, less aerodynamic, less reliably powered car is going to "own" its comparably more robust, and proven predecessor?

Oh, and the CSRT-4 is already done. Canceled because it was such a flop! The couldn't KEEP the NSRT-4 on the lots...they can't GIVE AWAY the CSRT-4! Hmmmm

Because the CSRT-4 is already canceled you will NEVER see the Stage-2, so good luck with that.

With all that being said, and yes, I don't like the CSRT-4 much...I *would* consider owning one with ONE condition! It HAS to have a suspension set-up like the preproduction one I drove and road in at SDAC18! If I can have that, then I'm all set!
Reaper1 is offline  
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links - Subscribe to remove this ad.
Old 07-27-2009, 12:18 PM   #17
Re: I Think "Caliber" needs to be added.  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Longview, TX

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 146
Feedback: (0)
VTECH is like have two different cams, not variable valve timing. Just sayin'
Turbo_Lover is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2009, 12:32 PM   #18
Re: I Think "Caliber" needs to be added.  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wind Gap, PA

My Ride: 1985 Shelby Charger
Engine: 2.2 turbo
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 197
Feedback: (1)
Images: 2
FAIL! i think we should have a poll on this...(A) to add caliber, (B) not add caliber, or (C) destroy all calibers already made, and get it overwith. my vote is C
85Shelbinaton is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2009, 02:25 PM   #19
Re: I Think "Caliber" needs to be added.  
Boostaholic
 
turbokid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Kansas City

My Ride: 89 Lebaron Conv.
Engine: 2.5 Turbo
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 4,971
Feedback: (2)
Images: 2
I vote they bring the Nsrt4 back
__________________
86 LASER xt- t1 auto ttops getting closer to running
87 white daytona- Stage 5 2.5 swapped with an s60
FORSALE!
http://www.turbododge.com/forums/f7/...n-parts.html88 black lebaron-turbo convertible going t1
89 spirit- srt swapped
89 Shelby Daytona-2.2 turbo 5 speed ttops
Forsale http://www.turbododge.com/forums/f7/...ytona-2-a.html
89 Blue Lebaron Premium- t1 automatic (gonna go t2)
66 Charger- First car 383 4 brl awaiting paint
turbokid is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2009, 03:00 PM   #20
Re: I Think "Caliber" needs to be added.  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: danielsville,pa 18038

My Ride: 89 csx,91 r/t,07 ram
Engine: T4,t3,hemi
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 208
Feedback: (1)
Images: 1
my wife loves her caliber because it has a glove box that keeps her drinks cold.and the cargo light in the back is a rechargeable flashlight.i on the other hand have only driven it once and that was enough for me.i hate it .i would rather drive a 84 omni auto w/out air as a daily than drive a caliber .neons are cool cause their heads fit our cars.calibers will never be cool even it were a stage 5.i thinks its time chrysler brings back the omni.
nicholas dotter is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2009, 03:09 PM   #21
Re: I Think "Caliber" needs to be added.  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Western Mass.

My Ride: SL #63, Neon SXT
Engine: 2.2 TII, 2.0 SOHC
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 259
Feedback: (2)
Images: 13
If you're going to use that whole "it's not a true Chrysler" argument, you should realize that Chrysler hasn't been... Chrysler... since around 1998 or so. Yes, I know the Caliber has a world engine but the Neon head was based off an old Mitsubishi design. Everything trickles down from somewhere, especially in the car world. Hell, the classic car crowd doesn't even look at our 80's TD's as being real Chryslers. It's all about perspective.
neonsox is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2009, 03:36 PM   #22
Re: I Think "Caliber" needs to be added.  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Jacksonville, Fl

My Ride: '88 Shelby Z TII
Engine: 2.2 TII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 14.284

Posts: 4,543
Feedback: (0)
Umm...no. The Neon head(the origional 2.0 DOHC version) was derrived from the TIII Lotus design. It wasn't all directly carried over, but a lot of the same elements are present. Hell, they even flow almost the same in stock form! A DOHC Mitsu head looks nothing like a DOHC Chrysler head with the valve covers off....
Reaper1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2009, 06:48 PM   #23
Re: I Think "Caliber" needs to be added.  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Valdosta, GA

My Ride: 89 Daytona Shelby
Engine: 4 cyl/2.5L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 24
Feedback: (0)
As a CSRT owner myself, I will say that the current SRT4 1/4 mile record holder is a Neon...however, Aaron, Brad, and the other guys at RealTune are already in the low 10s with this lunch pail on wheels, without NOS. And there is a "VTEC"-like control module that RealTune sells that hides any PSI reading above 15 from the ECU after 4500 rpm all the way to readline. It requires an electric dual-stage boost controller and a flash on a scangauge, but VTEC was 1st thing that Aaron said it reminded him of once they tested it. And sorry to all the Neon owners, but the Caliber WILL BE the fastest SRT4 with or without NOS, no doubt in my mind. Give It another month or 3 and it will be there. Some things are just not meant to be, sorry Neon guys. As much as you may not like it, it's gonna happen; Caliber will rule the SRT4 world.
Caliber has a few dedicated websites already and I didn't wanna be the 1st to post anything about it gettin added to the SRT4 section on here since they have some reasonable support elsewhere.
pumaboyairn is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2009, 07:41 PM   #24
Re: I Think "Caliber" needs to be added.  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: syracuse ny

My Ride: 86 daytona cs
Engine: 2.2 t1
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 437
Feedback: (1)
Images: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by pumaboyairn View Post
As a CSRT owner myself, I will say that the current SRT4 1/4 mile record holder is a Neon...however, Aaron, Brad, and the other guys at RealTune are already in the low 10s with this lunch pail on wheels, without NOS. And there is a "VTEC"-like control module that RealTune sells that hides any PSI reading above 15 from the ECU after 4500 rpm all the way to readline. It requires an electric dual-stage boost controller and a flash on a scangauge, but VTEC was 1st thing that Aaron said it reminded him of once they tested it. And sorry to all the Neon owners, but the Caliber WILL BE the fastest SRT4 with or without NOS, no doubt in my mind. Give It another month or 3 and it will be there. Some things are just not meant to be, sorry Neon guys. As much as you may not like it, it's gonna happen; Caliber will rule the SRT4 world.
Caliber has a few dedicated websites already and I didn't wanna be the 1st to post anything about it gettin added to the SRT4 section on here since they have some reasonable support elsewhere.
A 1st gen neon + 2.4 + massive turbo = faster than a caliber will ever go. Starting off at a whopping 2400lbs, a caliber wouldn't be able to touch it.
thedon809 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2009, 08:17 PM   #25
Re: I Think "Caliber" needs to be added.  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Valdosta, GA

My Ride: 89 Daytona Shelby
Engine: 4 cyl/2.5L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 24
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by thedon809 View Post
A 1st gen neon + 2.4 + massive turbo = faster than a caliber will ever go. Starting off at a whopping 2400lbs, a caliber wouldn't be able to touch it.
Obviously, there's a difference in weight. But you're talkin a 1st Gen Neon with a transplanted SRT motor and toys, not an off-the-lot SRT vehicle. Granted, no one ever said anyting about franken-cars, but while we're at it, let's get rid of the SRT motor all together and throw in some twin-rotary eninges with toys, or since we like keepin it in the Dodge family, lets just toss a Viper engine in the damn thing. I don't think the original postee expected this topic to go this route so I'll concede since I obviousy blindsided myself, I totally forgot about the franken-Neons out there. Kudos on the car though. From the specs you posted, seems like the Caliber's got a little ways to go before it surpasses that vehicle in particular. I just don't think I would say "faster than a Caliber will ever go." With the typical tenth-of-a-second per 100 lbs, the Neon you speak of has a 7/10 of a second lead (CSRT4 weighs in at 3100 lbs, so a 700-lb diff). Sorry if I ruffled the feathers, I'm just really excited bout the near future of the CSRT4's aftermarket, a lotta goodies are on the way.
pumaboyairn is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2009, 10:39 PM   #26
Re: I Think "Caliber" needs to be added.  
Boostaholic
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: by 1 of 10,000 lakes

My Ride: 90Shelby/92 IROC rt
Engine: vnt 2.2l/2.2t3
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 526
Feedback: (7)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reaper1 View Post
Umm...no. The Neon head(the origional 2.0 DOHC version) was derrived from the TIII Lotus design. It wasn't all directly carried over, but a lot of the same elements are present. Hell, they even flow almost the same in stock form! A DOHC Mitsu head looks nothing like a DOHC Chrysler head with the valve covers off....
I thought it was the hans-hermann head that they ripped off to design the neon head.
MNmopar is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2009, 11:21 PM   #27
Re: I Think "Caliber" needs to be added.  
Bye.
 
the.palmetto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: St. Louis

My Ride: WS6
Engine: 5.7 LS1
Induct: N/A
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 567
Feedback: (0)
I will admit the Caliber (even the SRT-4) are not the greatest looking cars, but I can get over that. My friend has one and all he has done to it is a Stage 1 flash, aftermarket exhaust, and a wastegate and he has 310 at the wheels. I know 2.4 swaps are great and all, but the Caliber 2.4 is better designed. People are already making a ton of power on aftermarket crap.
the.palmetto is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2009, 12:16 AM   #28
Re: I Think "Caliber" needs to be added.  
Boostaholic
 
turbokid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Kansas City

My Ride: 89 Lebaron Conv.
Engine: 2.5 Turbo
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 4,971
Feedback: (2)
Images: 2
The caliber is not gonna be the fastest SRT4.
Sorry weight, bulkiness and design come into play. I know pt cruisers in the 10's but I am not gonna bet that with the same mods a neon srt4 wont smoke it.
Its heavier, it bulkier, its uglier (not that that matters too much) and even starting with a 50 HP gain stock for stock it still isnt faster then the N-SRT4.
You can make any car go fast with will power.
But with the same amount of mods, a NSRT4 will be faster then a caliber.
__________________
86 LASER xt- t1 auto ttops getting closer to running
87 white daytona- Stage 5 2.5 swapped with an s60
FORSALE!
http://www.turbododge.com/forums/f7/...n-parts.html88 black lebaron-turbo convertible going t1
89 spirit- srt swapped
89 Shelby Daytona-2.2 turbo 5 speed ttops
Forsale http://www.turbododge.com/forums/f7/...ytona-2-a.html
89 Blue Lebaron Premium- t1 automatic (gonna go t2)
66 Charger- First car 383 4 brl awaiting paint
turbokid is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2009, 05:04 AM   #29
Re: I Think "Caliber" needs to be added.  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Connecticut

My Ride: 1986 GLHS #126
Engine: stock
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 12.920

Posts: 2,652
Feedback: (0)
i rented a 2.0L Caliber w/ the CVT automatic trany, drove it almost 2,000 miles in four days....it was the biggest pile of steaming dog crap i ever drove. ugly. noisy. gutless. the interior could not be worse. i hate the Caliber now.
Marcus86GLHS is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2009, 08:41 AM   #30
Re: I Think "Caliber" needs to be added.  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Western Mass.

My Ride: SL #63, Neon SXT
Engine: 2.2 TII, 2.0 SOHC
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 259
Feedback: (2)
Images: 13
Quote:
Dan Minick, a columnist for Automotive Rebuilder, pointed out:
The 2.0 blocks [SOHC and DOHC] have the same casting number. There may be machining differences for mounting.
The SOHC cylinder head is only used on the 2.0 SOHC. The DOHC Neon shares a cylinder head with the 2.4. The Avenger/Sebring/Eclipse 2.0 DOHC head is unique and has reversed flow.
The 2.0/2.4 uses the same bore and bore centers as the old 2.2/2.5. There are quite a few similarities with the lower end of the block of the 'new' 2.0/2.4 and the 2.2/2.5. However the cylinder head of the 2.0/2.4 DOHC is an outright copy of the Mitsu 2.0 G63 DOHC, while the SOHC version of the Chrysler 2.0 borrows heavily from Mitsu's early 90s G15 1.5 colt motor.
There you have it. Silly kids.
neonsox is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:20 AM.

Page generated in 0.21411 seconds with 9 queries