 |
  |
 |
03-31-2007, 11:42 AM
|
#2
|
  |
|
|
|
Boostaholic
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Surrey, B.C.
My Ride: '92 IROC R/T
Engine: 2.2 135ci TIII 16v
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
William,
All aspects of the VNT is controlled by the computer (unless it's cool outside lol). You can controll the boost of a VNT, and actually use a G-valve or some sort of MBC to controll boost.
I've never used a standalone engine management system before, but I'm sure you can get it to work with on a VNT (twin VNT's would require a bit of fabrication but is possible), although there are cheaper options....and owning a TD is all about being cheap! lol
__________________
'01 Maxima SE
'92 Chrylser Daytona IROC R/T-t3/t4 ceramic dbb stg III turbo, adj. Konis w/ Eibachs, dyno 217hp @ 11psi at the wheels w/ stock parts.
'84 TIII Rampage-LWP Stage II port with LWP Stage I cams, port matched manifolds (work in progress).
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
03-31-2007, 04:22 PM
|
#3
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Gresham, Oregon
My Ride: '89 plymouth voyager
Engine: 2.2 TII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 16.800
|
http://www.thedodgegarage.com/turbo_vnt.html
AFIK there is no wastegate on a VNT. You can control the vanes using a MBC.
Twins on a 2.2/2.5 or twins on a ?
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
04-01-2007, 04:35 PM
|
#5
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Gresham, Oregon
My Ride: '89 plymouth voyager
Engine: 2.2 TII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 16.800
|
Just a wild guess, pair of T25's should work, 1 T28 is going to be to small. You may also need to keep the option of an external gate for the turbo's open. Like the link says, when you are crusing around it's one thing, but when you have a big load on it, there could be problems.
Aren't there some diesel trucks that have VNT's? Those might be a better idea for a single. Just some ideas, a TT 'Cuda sounds like a cool project!
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
04-01-2007, 07:06 PM
|
#6
|
  |
|
|
|
Boostaholic
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Surrey, B.C.
My Ride: '92 IROC R/T
Engine: 2.2 135ci TIII 16v
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
There are so many variations of the "OLD" VNT technology being used today as "NEW" tech. Audis, Mercedes, VW's, diesel trucks, etc use some sort of VNT/VGT. When I was pushing the limits of my S60 VNT, I was going to get a bigger one, but didn't feel like messing around with trying to control the boost.
IMHO, if you're using those on a 3.5l v6, you might want to have like a t28 for the low end and a slightly bigger on up top. I say this only because the t25's 'might' run way out of steam by then, although I've seen VW guys run them up to <gulp> 30psi and live to tell about it. lol In any case, if you put them on a 3.5 v6, you're gonna have some fun!
__________________
'01 Maxima SE
'92 Chrylser Daytona IROC R/T-t3/t4 ceramic dbb stg III turbo, adj. Konis w/ Eibachs, dyno 217hp @ 11psi at the wheels w/ stock parts.
'84 TIII Rampage-LWP Stage II port with LWP Stage I cams, port matched manifolds (work in progress).
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
04-05-2007, 09:31 AM
|
#7
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Beaver Bank, NS, Canada.
1/4: 0.000
|
Thanks for the input guys.
I will have to look very closely at what the VNT's will support. I am still on the fence as to whether it will be a 3.5 or a 3.9, but with that displacement, it will be critical to get the correct turbo setup. I thought the VNT might give me an edge in the heavy car, keeping the available torque at a lower RPM. The 3.9 would be a lower static compression, and a less efficient design, so I would need to run significantly more boost, perhaps 10-14psi. The 3.5 might support the HP I need at a modest 6-8 psi, which means less work for the turbo.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Quick Nav |
|
» Quick Tech |
|
» Market Place |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|