 |
|
  |
 |
01-17-2008, 01:35 PM
|
#1
|
  |
|
vnt decoding
|
|
Garrett Booster
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Nisswa Minnesota
My Ride: 90Shelby/91IROC tona
Engine: vnt 2.2l/2.5t1
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
No one knows how to decode VNT's in a 1990 Daytona VIN?
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
01-17-2008, 02:39 PM
|
#2
|
  |
|
Re: vnt decoding
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: harrisburg, pa
My Ride: 89 voyager
Engine: 2.5
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
01-17-2008, 03:49 PM
|
#3
|
  |
|
Re: vnt decoding
|
|
Garrett Booster
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Nisswa Minnesota
My Ride: 90Shelby/91IROC tona
Engine: vnt 2.2l/2.5t1
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
Thanks dingles9,
I saw that, but I don't know how that tells me if it's a vnt? There's no code option for the vnt, just a 2.2 turbo or efi... am I missing something?
josh
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
01-17-2008, 03:55 PM
|
#4
|
  |
|
Re: vnt decoding
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Guelph Ont
My Ride: 88,89 lebaron
Engine: 2.5n/a ,2.5 turbo
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
I don't know much about the VNT's but i did notice that they have a weird airbox.
VNT
TII
Now that might not only be on the VNT's i forget.
__________________
Brendan O'Halloran
1989 2.5 TI lebaron vert.
1989 2.5 TI shadow 4dr
CAI,TII I/C,WRX BOV,2.5"exhaust,12psi,5 spd.
 Quote:
|
|
"In racing its not what they see,but what they perceive."
|
  |
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
01-17-2008, 04:44 PM
|
#5
|
  |
|
Re: vnt decoding
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: sherwood park,AB
My Ride: 90vnt daytona shelby
Engine: 2.2 L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
look at your vac diagram uder the hood if you still have it.If it's a stock vnt car you will see 2 vac lines going to the turbocharger wastegate.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
01-17-2008, 04:51 PM
|
#6
|
  |
|
Re: vnt decoding
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Nashville TN
My Ride: 87 Daytona Shelby Z
Engine: 2.2 T2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
quote
Thanks dingles9,
I saw that, but I don't know how that tells me if it's a vnt?
if your tryin to figure out if its a VNT the 8th digit in the vin would be (C)
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
01-17-2008, 05:24 PM
|
#7
|
  |
|
Re: vnt decoding
|
|
Garrett Booster
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Nisswa Minnesota
My Ride: 90Shelby/91IROC tona
Engine: vnt 2.2l/2.5t1
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
Thanks guys, I'll check the airbox and the vac lines.
What confuses me about the 8th digit being a "C" is that the decoder I read in a Chilton manual for Daytona's of this year says that "C" is a turbo 2.2l and that's all it says. (It doesn't differentiate turbos in the code)
I thought that Daytona's that year had the turbo II's and the VNT's as options, so I was hoping one of the decoders would have the vnt as a seperate letter not just lumping all the turbos together with a "C"... if that make sense.
Thanks guys, I really appreciate your help!
josh
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
01-17-2008, 05:27 PM
|
#8
|
  |
|
Re: vnt decoding
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Nashville TN
My Ride: 87 Daytona Shelby Z
Engine: 2.2 T2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
the turbo 2 vin is an (a)
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
02-07-2008, 06:15 PM
|
#10
|
  |
|
Re: vnt decoding
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: fayetteville, nc
My Ride: 86 Shelby Charger
Engine: 2.2 turbo I
1/4: 0.000
|
Where is the VIN number located on the engine? I have picked up a motor that was supposed to be a VNT without the turbo. So I am having a hard time knowing if it is a VNT with forged internals or a regular Turbo 2 motor.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
02-07-2008, 06:18 PM
|
#11
|
  |
|
Re: vnt decoding
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Nashville TN
My Ride: 87 Daytona Shelby Z
Engine: 2.2 T2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
Im pretty sure the VNT is a T2 motor
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
02-07-2008, 07:13 PM
|
#12
|
  |
|
Re: vnt decoding
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: fayetteville, nc
My Ride: 86 Shelby Charger
Engine: 2.2 turbo I
1/4: 0.000
|
yes, but I thought VNT motors had forged internals but not all t2 were forged?
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
02-07-2008, 07:16 PM
|
#13
|
  |
|
Re: vnt decoding
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Nashville TN
My Ride: 87 Daytona Shelby Z
Engine: 2.2 T2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
I think the only thing in both motors that arent forged are the pistons,Im trying to find were I read the article
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
02-07-2008, 07:23 PM
|
#14
|
  |
|
Re: vnt decoding
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Nashville TN
My Ride: 87 Daytona Shelby Z
Engine: 2.2 T2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
Im still looking but have you checked out this site on the left look for turbo data base and click on number 07. Short Block, what's hot and what's not it might help a little at least until I can find the site
Donovan's Dodge Garage
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
02-07-2008, 08:16 PM
|
#15
|
  |
|
Re: vnt decoding
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Nashville TN
My Ride: 87 Daytona Shelby Z
Engine: 2.2 T2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
this still isnt what I was lookin for but I hope it helps
In 1988 Chrysler went to the 1 piece intake manifold- Identical to the TI piece in every respect except it was painted black and had a charge air sensor installed, also the TII engines continued to use a Garrett turbo unlike their TI counterparts. In 1989 Chrysler introduced the common block TII engine which carried over the TII engines bulletproof internals now housed in a much stiffer, stronger block. In late 1989 (Shelby- CSX) and 1990 (Chrysler- Daytona, Shadow, Lebaron) you could buy a TURBO IV- Basically a 1989 Turbo II motor with a Variable Nozzle Turbocharger. The 2.2 VNT was a great concept in reducing lag but it cost more then a regular TII setup and there was numerous control issues. The final nail in the coffin was that with minor software changes the 2.5 TI produced just about as much torque and hp as the 2.2 VNT but without the intercooler and fancy expensive Garrett VNT turbo. The VNT's biggest dirty little secret was that it made less hp then last years TII- 162 hp vs. 174 hp. The VNT was originally designed to be used on a 1.5-1.8 liter engine and had to spin at 179,000 rpm's to provide 12 psi of boost for a 2.2- by comparison a TII Garrett does the job at only 140,000 rpm.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Quick Nav |
|
» Quick Tech |
|
» Market Place |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|