08-13-2005, 02:18 AM
|
#5
|
  |
|
|
|
Boostaholic
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Surrey, B.C.
My Ride: '92 IROC R/T
Engine: 2.2 135ci TIII 16v
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
 Quote:
|
Originally Posted by qzone83
if thats it maybe i should convert to a t2 after all. it'll cost a little more but at least i'd be able to reach the power levels i'm looking for.
|
  |
...........and this is exactly why people stray from the VNT. My estimate is by no means reality, you could make more. But I made sure to set 'goals' and then go for them. I've known for many years the limitations of the VNT but chose to accept them. Plus my car is a daily driver and kind of a Frankenstein of a car anyway. So I set out to find the S60 VNT and I don't regret it one bit. The VNT28 would make a bit more hp at stock levels. With a FWDP S3 VNT cal set at 18psi, I would put my 'guestimate' a bit higher. Like I've said before, there are 3 members on here that have road in my car and know how quick and hard the car pulls on a stock engine. I'm sure I'm above the power levels of a reg. VNT, even at 10lbs of boost. At 18lbs, the car is still building power hard, but I always back off. The 2.2 timing curve on the computer is too much for the stock 2.5. For me, this power level is fine for going to work and towing with faster cars. You just have to set realistic goals and shoot for them. Problem is once you reach them, you want MORE! This my friend, is called the TD boost bug! LOL
Now the motor that's going in my Rampage is gonna be a killer.

__________________
'01 Maxima SE
'92 Chrylser Daytona IROC R/T-t3/t4 ceramic dbb stg III turbo, adj. Konis w/ Eibachs, dyno 217hp @ 11psi at the wheels w/ stock parts.
'84 TIII Rampage-LWP Stage II port with LWP Stage I cams, port matched manifolds (work in progress).
|
|
|