TurboDodge.com MarketPlace Shelby Registry Contact Us

Advertisement - Remove these ads today by clicking here.
 

Go Back   TurboDodge.Com - Turbo Dodge forum for Turbo Mopars, Shelbys, Daytona, SRT-4, PT Cruiser, Omni and more! > Turbo specific > 16v Conversion

16v Conversion Converting to 16V status

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools

Old 01-28-2006, 01:19 PM   #1
You'll hate my next idea.  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Cleveland

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 246
Feedback: (0)
I plan on running a DSM engine harness and ECU.
PROS:
  1. easy datalogging, I already use the software for datalogging my Colt.
  2. can use SAFC
  3. can later use DSM link for full manual control of engine
  4. CHEAP, at least for me
I already have a parts car w/ ECU and harness. I have an extra SAFC. All my friends that are smarter than me are familiar w/ the DSM stuff. I won't have to pay for a custom cal and when I make changes to the car I won't have to send my computer back for changes. My only real expense will be a Mass air translator ($200) since I will be using a blow through GM Mass air(free). I don't know what a custom cal + 3 bar map will cost, but I'm sure it's more than $200.
CONS:
  1. I will have to adapt a DSM cam angle sensor
  2. having to wire it in
As far as I know all I need is the injector harness, tps, coolant temp, knock sensor, O2 sensor, and coil pack. I already (with help from friends) wired my Colt this way and it wasnt bad at all. I would have to add all the same sensors to the 16 valve setup to run the dodge electronics anyway.

Last edited by 8valveprick; 01-28-2006 at 09:21 PM.
8valveprick is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2006, 03:56 PM   #2
 
Una
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bremerton, WA

My Ride: Horizon GLH-T
Engine: 2.5L Turbo
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 14.900

Posts: 5,138
Feedback: (0)
Sounds like a good idea for you. Should be easy. No crank angle sensor? I hear MAF fuel injection is alot easier/more forgiving to tune..
Una is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2006, 04:11 PM   #3
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba

My Ride: 1987 Daytona Shelby
Engine: 2.5 16v
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 2,205
Feedback: (0)
Could you not use the neon Cam angle sensor for that? or adapt it to the work off the cam?
Garret is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2006, 06:05 PM   #4
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Milw. WI

My Ride: No slicks Omni
Engine: 2.2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 12.036

Posts: 2,815
Feedback: (1)
We have a local DSM guy (Talon) who was first to
run in the 10's with stock lower end. Pretty stout
stuff, especialy in that flyweight.
russ jerome is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2006, 09:30 PM   #5
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Cleveland

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 246
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Garret
Could you not use the neon Cam angle sensor for that? or adapt it to the work off the cam?
I'm wondering that myself. On the DSM you adjust timing by moving the cam angle sensor, the one on the Neon head is stationary. I took a long look at it today and I don't think it will be hard to make an adapter. I just have to remove the magnet and replace it w/ an aluminum piece, and put a slot in it to turn the DSM unit. Then I have to make a cover plate w/ the right size hole so the sensor's O-ring will seal.
8valveprick is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2006, 09:32 PM   #6
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Cleveland

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 246
Feedback: (0)
Just thought of something else. Are Dodge injectors high or low impedence. I think DSMs use low.
8valveprick is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2006, 10:30 PM   #7
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba

My Ride: 1987 Daytona Shelby
Engine: 2.5 16v
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 2,205
Feedback: (0)
well why not use the DSM injectors?
Garret is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2006, 11:23 PM   #8
 
Una
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bremerton, WA

My Ride: Horizon GLH-T
Engine: 2.5L Turbo
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 14.900

Posts: 5,138
Feedback: (0)
Low impedance
Una is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2006, 08:59 AM   #9
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
ohiorob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: new springfield ohio

My Ride: 83 shelby charger
Engine: 2.4 DOHC
Induct: Turbo + Nitrous
1/4: 10.066

Posts: 529
Feedback: (0)
Won't the cam angle sensor be turning the wrong way on the dodge head ?
by the way I think you got a good idea there.
ohiorob is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2006, 05:18 PM   #10
 
Una
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bremerton, WA

My Ride: Horizon GLH-T
Engine: 2.5L Turbo
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 14.900

Posts: 5,138
Feedback: (0)
How does it matter what way it turns? It just generates pulses.
Una is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2006, 08:53 PM   #11
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Cleveland

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 246
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Garret
well why not use the DSM injectors?
They don't fit. They are shorter and fatter.
BTW: The only reason I wrote that you'd hate my idea is that every time I see DSM on here somebody gets all worked up and has to argue how much better Dodges are.
8valveprick is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2006, 09:11 PM   #12
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Cleveland

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 246
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ohiorob
Won't the cam angle sensor be turning the wrong way on the dodge head ?
by the way I think you got a good idea there.
They should be turning the same way. They will both be on the end opposite the cam gears and if my memory is correct both motors spin the same direction. Clockwise when facing the timing belt side of the motor.
Quote:
How does it matter what way it turns? It just generates pulses.
My DSM friend told me it would matter to the computer. I didn't ask why, but he knows his DSM junk.
8valveprick is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2006, 09:20 PM   #13
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba

My Ride: 1987 Daytona Shelby
Engine: 2.5 16v
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 2,205
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 8valveprick
They don't fit. They are shorter and fatter.
BTW: The only reason I wrote that you'd hate my idea is that every time I see DSM on here somebody gets all worked up and has to argue how much better Dodges are.

Well they clearly are better than DSMs, but owning a TD is all about stealing parts from a better car to use on ours
Garret is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2006, 09:10 AM   #14
 
Boostaholic
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Alma, Quebec

My Ride: Omni
Engine: 2.2 liter 16V hybrid
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 900
Feedback: (0)
If you know DSM computer, it's not a bad idea.

For my 16V, i'l go with flashable smec, much more easy to do, but no dataloging available for now..maybe....


Guillaume
guidsm is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2006, 10:37 AM   #15
 
Una
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bremerton, WA

My Ride: Horizon GLH-T
Engine: 2.5L Turbo
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 14.900

Posts: 5,138
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by guidsm
If you know DSM computer, it's not a bad idea.

For my 16V, i'l go with flashable smec, much more easy to do, but no dataloging available for now..maybe....


Guillaume
Datalog with an OTC 4000E hooked to a laptop.. That's what Paul at TU did on the Dyno..
Una is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

» Quick Nav
- Home
- Classifieds
- Timeslips
- Gallery
- Vendors
-- Directory
- Tech Articles
- Donate
Sponsors
remove ads

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1
Credit Cards | Mortgage | Free Advertising | Secured Loans | Advertising


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:10 PM.

Page generated in 0.47215 seconds with 13 queries