01-10-2007, 03:47 PM
|
#1
|
  |
|
Ready to make decisions on the block mods
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Eagle, Idaho
1/4: 0.000
|
I have my common block and a 2.0 head gasket, so I'm ready to commit the block to the conversion. I've seen a couple competing options on the block modifications:
1) Drill a hole to match the existing equalization hole in the head vs. modify the head and block to run an external equalization line. Does anyone have a reason to favor one over the other?
2) I plan to modify the head to take coolant at the driver's side to avoid belt conflicts on the passenger side. The head gasket has restrictions placed with the assumption that the coolant enters at the passenger side. Some suggest flipping the gasket to place the greatest restriction closest to the coolant entry. Others say this is not important. Is there reason not to? (Other than a previous choice to use the head's existing equalization hole.)
3) The block is cross-drilled between the cylinders. These holes do not align with any coolant passage in the head. Some have plugged the cross-drilled holes, others have not. Does leaving them unplugged increase the potential for a coolant leak?
4) At its most restrictive end, the head gasket completely blocks one coolant path and on another path provides a small hole that does not align with any coolant path in the block. I think I've seen one case where the builder drilled the block to provide a coolant path aligning with this hole. Most often I don't see this mentioned, at least not explicitly. Is it important?
David
|
|
|