 |
|
  |
 |
06-19-2005, 07:41 PM
|
#1
|
  |
|
Manual tranny?
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Iowa
My Ride: 1987 "Supertona"
Engine: 2.2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
Why isnt anybody using the newer hydrolic manual tranny? There has got to be a way to make everything work, just curious if anybody is doing this?
-Kaleb
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
06-19-2005, 08:22 PM
|
#2
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bremerton, WA
My Ride: Horizon GLH-T
Engine: 2.5L Turbo
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 14.900
|
Plug and play simplicity. Hydraulic would definitely be better, but there's alot to say for just being able to simply hook up the cable and call it good.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
06-20-2005, 11:34 PM
|
#3
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Iowa
My Ride: 1987 "Supertona"
Engine: 2.2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
So most people just dont want to mess with it?
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
06-20-2005, 11:48 PM
|
#4
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bremerton, WA
My Ride: Horizon GLH-T
Engine: 2.5L Turbo
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 14.900
|
Why bother? I've had cars in the past with hydraulic clutches.. They're far more problematic when they get old than cables are. You have 2 points of failure possible with a cable based clutch. The self adjuster in the pedal, and the cable itself. Both of which are pretty quick to troubleshoot and easy to replace by yourself. With a hydraulic clutch you have the master cylinder, slave cylinder, and the lines running between them that could go bad. Not to mention having to bleed the system when air gets into it, or when the fluid gets old and needs to be flushed. And you can't do that by yourself unless you have special equipment to help you out..
That's just my take on things..
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
06-21-2005, 10:10 AM
|
#5
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Albany, NY
My Ride: Whatever runs
Engine: 2.7tt, 2.0, 2.5, 2.2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
 Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Una
Plug and play simplicity. Hydraulic would definitely be better, but there's alot to say for just being able to simply hook up the cable and call it good.
|
  |
I agree completely. Hydraulic clutches SUCK. It is a pain dealing with them OEM with my DSM's.  Stick with a cable operated one unless you get the trans for free then it would probably be worth it.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
06-21-2005, 12:01 PM
|
#6
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Iowa
My Ride: 1987 "Supertona"
Engine: 2.2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
SO what would be the ideal tranny to use on the 01 on up 2.4's? I have been hearing that they made a cable tranny in the earlier RT 1st gen Neons, but I alo heard that it was weak to any kind of power.
-Kaleb
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
06-21-2005, 05:02 PM
|
#7
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Cherry Hill, People's Republic
My Ride: 87' T-Top Shelby Z
Engine: 2.2 T2, A555, open
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
you could always have the weaker trans cyroed...
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
06-21-2005, 06:21 PM
|
#8
|
  |
|
|
|
Boostaholic
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Isle De Muerta (Perryopolis PA)
My Ride: The Black Pearl
1/4: 0.000
|
 Quote:
|
Originally Posted by kaleb
SO what would be the ideal tranny to use on the 01 on up 2.4's? I have been hearing that they made a cable tranny in the earlier RT 1st gen Neons, but I alo heard that it was weak to any kind of power.
-Kaleb
|
  |
The numbers say they are weak. Liek rated at 160ft-lb of torque, but the real world numbers are different.... 500HP through one. But as Kajjathefang said, the cold treatment will do a lot of good. ~~Heath
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
06-21-2005, 09:17 PM
|
#9
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bremerton, WA
My Ride: Horizon GLH-T
Engine: 2.5L Turbo
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 14.900
|
Wonder if you can toss the 568 guts into one of those early Neon trannies like you can with the V6 A543.. 568 gears, quaife, and a cryo treated case, I think you'd be in hog heaven.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
06-22-2005, 01:27 AM
|
#10
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Carlisle PA
1/4: 0.000
|
The neon trans is a New Venture Gear trans, the later TD's are a New Process Gear trans. New Venture Gear is a joint venture between GM and Dodge, so the Saturn’s and stuff have similar internals as the neon trans. Here is a good cross reference for the neon trans http://www.2gnt.com/nuke/modules.php...=Manual+Tranny
I haven't heard that the case was weaker on the earlier trans only that the gears were weaker, but the trans are under rated. Here is a good thread of what they can take... http://www.neons.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=219114
Here is a page by New Venture Gear http://www.newventuregear.com/transaxles.html
The NV T750 is the SRT4 trans and it is rated at 210ft-lbs that is a little under rated.
There was some talk of mixing and matching gears on neons.org here is the thread.
http://www.neons.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=193703
I hope this helps.
Daniel Merrill
<---- PLEASE Provide feedback for posts you like!
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
06-23-2005, 09:55 AM
|
#14
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: www.TurboDodge.com
My Ride: 1986 Plymouth Horizo
Engine: 2.2 Turbo
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 11.705
|
 Quote:
|
Originally Posted by The Pope
the Neon trany is a diesel mini van trany from the UK and is a T850. Where did T750 come from? And they suck anyway, they are tough with torque but better shift it like a grandma or the shift forks bend. Junk, rather have a new process getrag with that posi.
|
  |
It shifts really well if you put in the correct fluid (not the factory specified ATF) and change the shifter.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
06-23-2005, 09:57 AM
|
#15
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: www.TurboDodge.com
My Ride: 1986 Plymouth Horizo
Engine: 2.2 Turbo
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 11.705
|
 Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Una
Wonder if you can toss the 568 guts into one of those early Neon trannies like you can with the V6 A543.. 568 gears, quaife, and a cryo treated case, I think you'd be in hog heaven. 
|
  |
I'm betting the Neon tranny is no weaker than a 568.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Quick Nav |
|
» Quick Tech |
|
» Market Place |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|