TurboDodge.com MarketPlace Shelby Registry Contact Us

Advertisement - Remove these ads today by clicking here.
 

Go Back   TurboDodge.Com - Turbo Dodge forum for Turbo Mopars, Shelbys, Daytona, SRT-4, PT Cruiser, Omni and more! > Turbo specific > 16v Conversion

16v Conversion Converting to 16V status

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools

Old 06-19-2005, 07:41 PM   #1
Manual tranny?  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Iowa

My Ride: 1987 "Supertona"
Engine: 2.2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 766
Feedback: (0)
Why isnt anybody using the newer hydrolic manual tranny? There has got to be a way to make everything work, just curious if anybody is doing this?
-Kaleb
spoolinhard is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2005, 08:22 PM   #2
 
Una
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bremerton, WA

My Ride: Horizon GLH-T
Engine: 2.5L Turbo
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 14.900

Posts: 5,138
Feedback: (0)
Plug and play simplicity. Hydraulic would definitely be better, but there's alot to say for just being able to simply hook up the cable and call it good.
Una is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2005, 11:34 PM   #3
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Iowa

My Ride: 1987 "Supertona"
Engine: 2.2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 766
Feedback: (0)
So most people just dont want to mess with it?
spoolinhard is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2005, 11:48 PM   #4
 
Una
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bremerton, WA

My Ride: Horizon GLH-T
Engine: 2.5L Turbo
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 14.900

Posts: 5,138
Feedback: (0)
Why bother? I've had cars in the past with hydraulic clutches.. They're far more problematic when they get old than cables are. You have 2 points of failure possible with a cable based clutch. The self adjuster in the pedal, and the cable itself. Both of which are pretty quick to troubleshoot and easy to replace by yourself. With a hydraulic clutch you have the master cylinder, slave cylinder, and the lines running between them that could go bad. Not to mention having to bleed the system when air gets into it, or when the fluid gets old and needs to be flushed. And you can't do that by yourself unless you have special equipment to help you out..
That's just my take on things..
Una is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2005, 10:10 AM   #5
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Albany, NY

My Ride: Whatever runs
Engine: 2.7tt, 2.0, 2.5, 2.2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 990
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Una
Plug and play simplicity. Hydraulic would definitely be better, but there's alot to say for just being able to simply hook up the cable and call it good.

I agree completely. Hydraulic clutches SUCK. It is a pain dealing with them OEM with my DSM's. Stick with a cable operated one unless you get the trans for free then it would probably be worth it.
88-16V-Lebaron is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2005, 12:01 PM   #6
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Iowa

My Ride: 1987 "Supertona"
Engine: 2.2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 766
Feedback: (0)
SO what would be the ideal tranny to use on the 01 on up 2.4's? I have been hearing that they made a cable tranny in the earlier RT 1st gen Neons, but I alo heard that it was weak to any kind of power.
-Kaleb
spoolinhard is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2005, 05:02 PM   #7
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Cherry Hill, People's Republic

My Ride: 87' T-Top Shelby Z
Engine: 2.2 T2, A555, open
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 486
Feedback: (0)
you could always have the weaker trans cyroed...
Khajjathefang is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2005, 06:21 PM   #8
 
Boostaholic
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Isle De Muerta (Perryopolis PA)

My Ride: The Black Pearl
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 2,269
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by kaleb
SO what would be the ideal tranny to use on the 01 on up 2.4's? I have been hearing that they made a cable tranny in the earlier RT 1st gen Neons, but I alo heard that it was weak to any kind of power.
-Kaleb

The numbers say they are weak. Liek rated at 160ft-lb of torque, but the real world numbers are different.... 500HP through one. But as Kajjathefang said, the cold treatment will do a lot of good. ~~Heath
Kid Doc is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2005, 09:17 PM   #9
 
Una
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bremerton, WA

My Ride: Horizon GLH-T
Engine: 2.5L Turbo
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 14.900

Posts: 5,138
Feedback: (0)
Wonder if you can toss the 568 guts into one of those early Neon trannies like you can with the V6 A543.. 568 gears, quaife, and a cryo treated case, I think you'd be in hog heaven.
Una is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2005, 01:27 AM   #10
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Carlisle PA

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,055
Feedback: (0)
The neon trans is a New Venture Gear trans, the later TD's are a New Process Gear trans. New Venture Gear is a joint venture between GM and Dodge, so the Saturn’s and stuff have similar internals as the neon trans. Here is a good cross reference for the neon trans http://www.2gnt.com/nuke/modules.php...=Manual+Tranny
I haven't heard that the case was weaker on the earlier trans only that the gears were weaker, but the trans are under rated. Here is a good thread of what they can take... http://www.neons.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=219114
Here is a page by New Venture Gear http://www.newventuregear.com/transaxles.html
The NV T750 is the SRT4 trans and it is rated at 210ft-lbs that is a little under rated.
There was some talk of mixing and matching gears on neons.org here is the thread.
http://www.neons.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=193703
I hope this helps.

Daniel Merrill




<---- PLEASE Provide feedback for posts you like!
89acclaim is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2005, 06:26 PM   #11
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Cocoa Beach

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 28
Feedback: (0)
The SRT tranny comes from a european diesel 4 banger so you know it can take way more the 210ft/lbs
Caliber R/T is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2005, 01:02 AM   #12
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Carlisle PA

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,055
Feedback: (0)
No, the SRT4 trans didn't come from Europe. The Trans from the 5spd GT Cruiser is from the European diesel. Pluss the NV T750 (SRT4 trans) has a Quaife if it isn't the 2003 year.

Daniel Merrill
89acclaim is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2005, 01:27 AM   #13
 
boosting change
 
The Pope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Spokane WA

Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 2,448
Feedback: (1)
the Neon trany is a diesel mini van trany from the UK and is a T850. Where did T750 come from? And they suck anyway, they are tough with torque but better shift it like a grandma or the shift forks bend. Junk, rather have a new process getrag with that posi.
The Pope is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2005, 09:55 AM   #14
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: www.TurboDodge.com

My Ride: 1986 Plymouth Horizo
Engine: 2.2 Turbo
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 11.705

Posts: 2,548
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Pope
the Neon trany is a diesel mini van trany from the UK and is a T850. Where did T750 come from? And they suck anyway, they are tough with torque but better shift it like a grandma or the shift forks bend. Junk, rather have a new process getrag with that posi.

It shifts really well if you put in the correct fluid (not the factory specified ATF) and change the shifter.
contraption22 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2005, 09:57 AM   #15
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: www.TurboDodge.com

My Ride: 1986 Plymouth Horizo
Engine: 2.2 Turbo
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 11.705

Posts: 2,548
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Una
Wonder if you can toss the 568 guts into one of those early Neon trannies like you can with the V6 A543.. 568 gears, quaife, and a cryo treated case, I think you'd be in hog heaven.
I'm betting the Neon tranny is no weaker than a 568.
contraption22 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

» Quick Nav
- Home
- Classifieds
- Timeslips
- Gallery
- Vendors
-- Directory
- Tech Articles
- Donate
Sponsors
remove ads

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1
Down Payment Assistance | Bankruptcy | Herbs | Xecuter 3 Mod Chip | Bankruptcy Certification


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:40 AM.

Page generated in 0.48153 seconds with 13 queries