TurboDodge.com MarketPlace Shelby Registry Contact Us

Advertisement - Remove these ads today by clicking here.
 

Go Back   TurboDodge.Com - Turbo Dodge forum for Turbo Mopars, Shelbys, Daytona, SRT-4, PT Cruiser, Omni and more! > Turbo specific > Other Turbo Vehicles

Other Turbo Vehicles Other turbocharged vehicle technical section.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools

Old 07-17-2006, 10:28 AM   #16
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Allentown, PA

My Ride: '69 chevy, '03 WRX
Engine: 358 600hp, 2.0 turbo
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 880
Feedback: (13)
Not a huge fan of VW, but I will say that I think their best car of all time is the beetle RSi. It is sick. There is a local guy who has one, it sounds nasty!! It has the VR6 turbo, Porsche calipers, etc..etc. I do like the N/A vr6 sound.
Csx254 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2006, 03:38 PM   #17
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Gillette, Wyoming

My Ride: Dodge Spirit R/T
Engine: 2.2L Turbo III
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 4,508
Feedback: (1)
I don't think that car had turbo, but it did have the 3.2L 24v VR6. Looks similar to the Golf R32 package.

Was there ever a production turbo VR6? What about the 2.7L bi-turbo Audi S4 engine, was that VR6?
iTurbo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2006, 06:38 PM   #18
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Allentown, PA

My Ride: '69 chevy, '03 WRX
Engine: 358 600hp, 2.0 turbo
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 880
Feedback: (13)
Nah, I am 99.9% sure that the Beetle RSi has the vr6 turbo. It is awd too. I have seen one. I saw it the first time in GT4 (for playstation), and didn't think it was real, but then I saw one at a local VW dealer and got a closer look. Its a sick car!!! I think you have to order it, and have it sent here to the US. They retail, I believe, for $70,000, but don't quote me.
Csx254 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2006, 06:32 AM   #19
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Carlisle PA

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,055
Feedback: (0)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volkswa...New_Beetle_RSi

http://www.conceptcarz.com/vehicle/z3077/default.aspx

Daiel Merrill
89acclaim is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2006, 10:28 AM   #20
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Websta-Doodley, Mass

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 999
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by iTurbo
I don't think that car had turbo, but it did have the 3.2L 24v VR6. Looks similar to the Golf R32 package.

Was there ever a production turbo VR6? What about the 2.7L bi-turbo Audi S4 engine, was that VR6?

No. A VR6 has a 15 degree angle and one head where the 2.7l is a conventional V6 with two heads. No commonality.
85woodywagon is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2006, 12:00 PM   #21
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Lincoln, Ne

My Ride: 91 Spirit R/T
Engine: TIII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 2,193
Feedback: (0)
Both the VR6 and 16V engines can be made to perform very well with forced induction. I've got 2 VW friends that are playing around with FI on thier rides. One is a MKII Jetta with a VR6 swap in it. Right now he's running a Vortech SC, non-intercooled and 12 psi-ramps gradually to 18 @8krpm. That car is a fricken blast! All that's done there to lower compression is a headgasket shim. I beleive he's sitting around 9.5:1 compression.

The other is running an older GTI with a 16V turbo setup. It's just about finished. Just waiting on the header to be welded up. It ran good and hard last year with megasquirt, 11:1 compression and a 75 shot of nitrous. Now it's 8.5:1, ported head and intake, T3/T4 57 trim. it should really fly in a couple weeks.
86Shelby is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2006, 11:34 AM   #22
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Allentown, PA

My Ride: '69 chevy, '03 WRX
Engine: 358 600hp, 2.0 turbo
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 880
Feedback: (13)


Guess I was wrong. sorry bout that. I guess the RSi I saw had an aftermarket/homeade turbo setup.
Csx254 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2006, 08:03 PM   #23
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Carlisle PA

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,055
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Csx254
Guess I was wrong. sorry bout that. I guess the RSi I saw had an aftermarket/homeade turbo setup.
It happens to all of us, don't worry.

A Vr6 swap into a scirocco could be fun. http://www.jwelty.com/jwelty3/carysciroccovr6.html
Though I would like black and not as low.

Though if you are looking for something different instead of a TD how about a 2.3 turbo ford car?

Daniel Merrill
89acclaim is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2006, 09:12 PM   #24
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Eastern WA... in Prosser

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,417
Feedback: (0)
I hate VW's. they are a royal pain to work on. Take everything you know about how normal cars are put together, and make it backwards and you have a VW.

stay far, far away...
TurboShadowES is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2006, 09:54 AM   #25
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Oct 2005

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,300
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by iTurbo
Anybody here have any experience with the VW VR6 engine? I'm thinking about buying a Jetta, GTI, or possibly a Corrado with this engine with the intention of turbocharging it for 400+ WHP. I'll need to sell a couple of my TDs first so I'm just thinking out loud at the moment.

Pm'd with lots of Info!.
sillywabbit is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2006, 04:18 PM   #26
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Champion Audi Coral Springs , FL

Induct: Turbo + Nitrous
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 241
Feedback: (1)
A tech in the shop has a VR6 Passat that he twin turbo'd using two 1.8t turbos that were replaced under warr. Homemade manifold, IC piping the whole works. Piggy back additional injector controller for the extra fuel. I will find out how much he has in it. Not alot I am sure.
turbodave/neon is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2006, 06:29 PM   #27
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Lincoln, Ne

My Ride: 91 Spirit R/T
Engine: TIII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 2,193
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by TurboShadowES
I hate VW's. they are a royal pain to work on. Take everything you know about how normal cars are put together, and make it backwards and you have a VW.

stay far, far away...
Naw, they are actually prety simple once you understand how they work. Before I understood it I would cringe when asked to work on them. The later fuel injected cars are very easy but the older Bosch system is a bit confusing at first.
86Shelby is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2007, 01:00 AM   #28
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: indiana

My Ride: 1986 laser xt t-tops
Engine: turbo 153
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 15.560

Posts: 34
Feedback: (0)
i have worked on a couple vr6's and yes you could i also worked on a couple audis with turbo-charged 5 cylinders and that could be a good potential but pricey you know how much those krauts want for parts? thats why i stick with dodge they made it easy and cheap for us to get lots of power with big wallets lacking big money!!!
turbo xtc is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2007, 03:17 PM   #29
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Richmond, VA

My Ride: 89+90 Daytona Shelby
Engine: 2.2 TII, 2.5 TI
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 2,108
Feedback: (1)
Images: 12
Older VWs aren't any more complicated than our TDs when you get down to it. The mechnical injection system is a blessing and a curse. It's a pain to fix, but it is very versatile. The ability to swap parts from any like-engine on those cars is nice too. I kept trying to convince my friend to do a turbo 16V swap on the Scirocco. I even offered to give him a spare Mitsu turbo and a manifold to cut the flange off. But he decided to go with a 2.0 16v N/A build-up instead. In a little car like a Scirocco (1700 lbs), it will fly. I wouldn't want a VR6 in one because it's heavy and throws the weight off a LOT, but the VR6 and the 16v 4-cyl. can put down some serious power. I'm not sure about the VR6, but the 16v engines ARE interference, so make sure your timing chain is good!
EvilcowRoland is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2007, 09:31 AM   #30
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Oct 2005

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,300
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by iTurbo
I don't think that car had turbo, but it did have the 3.2L 24v VR6. Looks similar to the Golf R32 package.

Was there ever a production turbo VR6? What about the 2.7L bi-turbo Audi S4 engine, was that VR6?
No production turbo VR6's and no Audi's longitduinal V6's are all real V's. Also the only non longitudinal car Audi makes is the A3. However, being it uses a transverse engine, that car does use a VR6 (and a 2.0T). From what I have heard he VR6 needs extra cooling when turboed because the cylinder configurations one flaw is that it holds in more heat.
sillywabbit is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

» Quick Nav
- Home
- Classifieds
- Timeslips
- Gallery
- Vendors
-- Directory
- Tech Articles
- Donate
Sponsors
remove ads

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1
Myspace Proxy | Bankruptcy | Actress | Free Advertising | Bankruptcy


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:15 AM.

Page generated in 0.46672 seconds with 13 queries