TurboDodge.com MarketPlace Shelby Registry Contact Us

Advertisement - Remove these ads today by clicking here.
 

Go Back   TurboDodge.Com - Turbo Dodge forum for Turbo Mopars, Shelbys, Daytona, SRT-4, PT Cruiser, Omni and more! > Turbo specific > Other Turbo Vehicles

Other Turbo Vehicles Other turbocharged vehicle technical section.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools

Old 10-14-2007, 12:32 AM   #31
Re: Chrylser COnquest?  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Allentown, PA

My Ride: 91 Galant Vr4
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 82
Feedback: (0)
4g63t Swap would be the only logical choice for a conquest.
90Laser is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2007, 02:27 AM   #32
Re: Chrylser COnquest?  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Salt Lake & Seattle

My Ride: 92 Duster
Engine: 3.0
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 12.700

Posts: 7,722
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 90Laser View Post
4g63t Swap would be the only logical choice for a conquest.
Why?
6g7x are mitsu so you are not crossing brands.
And you can bolt up 3.8L 6g75's to the same bell housing...and there is a billet crank from Nelson performance pro that takes that motor to 4.9L
4.9L of mitsu goodness vs 2.0-2.4L 4g63.
Hmmm. Assuming you had $ though

Seems like the 2.6L can make great power anyways so I dont know the point of going 4g63.

lsx seems like a great choice though. I would love an Iron block turbocharged LS motor in a small RWD car. Easy to deal with the transmission too!! You can get some ungodly strong t56's built for $1500.

No matter what mitsu engine you choose, it seems transmissions are a problem so I dont know how a any mitsu swap can really be "logical" unless you get some custom bellhousing work done to use another trans. .
Ondonti is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2007, 10:00 AM   #33
Re: Chrylser COnquest?  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: nj

My Ride: TIII R/T
Engine: 2.2L TURBO III
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.743

Posts: 7,362
Feedback: (10)
Images: 5
who cares about logic when you are looking for big power, be different
xtrempickup is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2007, 07:55 PM   #34
Re: Chrylser COnquest?  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Allentown, PA

My Ride: 91 Galant Vr4
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 82
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ondonti View Post
Why?
6g7x are mitsu so you are not crossing brands.
And you can bolt up 3.8L 6g75's to the same bell housing...and there is a billet crank from Nelson performance pro that takes that motor to 4.9L
4.9L of mitsu goodness vs 2.0-2.4L 4g63.
Hmmm. Assuming you had $ though

Seems like the 2.6L can make great power anyways so I dont know the point of going 4g63.

lsx seems like a great choice though. I would love an Iron block turbocharged LS motor in a small RWD car. Easy to deal with the transmission too!! You can get some ungodly strong t56's built for $1500.

No matter what mitsu engine you choose, it seems transmissions are a problem so I dont know how a any mitsu swap can really be "logical" unless you get some custom bellhousing work done to use another trans. .
4g63t is the proven motor. The 2.6 sucks, remember fuel injection back in 1986. Lsx is a great choice, but thats a lot more fab work which the average person wouldn't be able to do them selfs. Their are also alot of transmission options when doing a 4g from Rx7 trannys to b2200 transmissions. I personally if I had the time and money would do a ls1 swap before anything, but logically 4g63t would be easiest.



Quote:
Originally Posted by xtrempickup View Post
who cares about logic when you are looking for big power, be different
Really lsx swaps aren't "different" anymore. If you want to be different swap in a cummins.
90Laser is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2007, 08:45 PM   #35
Re: Chrylser COnquest?  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: NC

My Ride: 1986 GLHt
Engine: turboII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.880

Posts: 97
Feedback: (0)
miss information is a horrible thing.

just so everyone knows, there are now several 500hp street driven g54b's. some aftermarket recently steped up and now ditching the 2.6 is not the "in" thing.

if i were going to do a swap in one of these cars, a 4g63 would not even be in consideration.
refractory is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2007, 09:39 PM   #36
Re: Chrylser COnquest?  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Allentown, PA

My Ride: 91 Galant Vr4
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 82
Feedback: (0)
Thats your thing then I personally hate these cars, maybe I just had a bad experience? IMHO the only thing it was good for was some doughnuts.
90Laser is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2007, 10:01 PM   #37
Re: Chrylser COnquest?  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: NC

My Ride: 1986 GLHt
Engine: turboII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.880

Posts: 97
Feedback: (0)
and a crankwalking dsm is better? IMO neither of them are really that great, but opinions are like ass holes, every one has them right?


on that note, i was more so refering to yours and others misinformation, it would be nice if someone actually knew about these cars before they started rattleing off about whats bad about them. personal experiances are nothing if you didnt learn from it, meaning how to fix the problem at hand, not abandon it for another.
refractory is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2007, 10:55 PM   #38
Re: Chrylser COnquest?  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Allentown, PA

My Ride: 91 Galant Vr4
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 82
Feedback: (0)
I learned I'll never buy another one. It was one of the best $400 I've ever spent though.
90Laser is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2007, 04:02 AM   #39
Re: Chrylser COnquest?  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Salt Lake & Seattle

My Ride: 92 Duster
Engine: 3.0
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 12.700

Posts: 7,722
Feedback: (0)
what kind of rear suspension do they have?
Ondonti is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2007, 04:51 AM   #40
Re: Chrylser COnquest?  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: missouri

My Ride: 1987 Conquest TSI
Engine: 2.6
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.230

Posts: 20
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by refractory View Post
on that note, i was more so refering to yours and others misinformation, it would be nice if someone actually knew about these cars before they started rattleing off about whats bad about them. personal experiances are nothing if you didnt learn from it, meaning how to fix the problem at hand, not abandon it for another.
Exaclty true......To talk about how something is a POS without actually understanding it, isn't right. Just cause someone bought a car ran the piss out of it and it did not hold up to there abuse.....come on....don't blame it on the car. Just like (almost) any motor, build it to take the abuse. A 2.6 is a strong motor. Came from the factory with steel crank and rods. The weak point of it and why everyone bashes it was for the head problems. Fix that and work with the TBI (cause that is what you have. Or spend the money and go MPI. I have personally put over 20,000 miles on my build in the last year and a half. I run it with the boost set at 20-21psi and I have not had to put a wrench on it. Will I? Sure. But that is what I built it for. FUN damn it. LOL

I want to also add that I am in NO WAY comparing the g54b to the 4g63. The 4g63 has proven itself time and time again.

The rear suspension is an Indepedant set up with a 3.54 LSD. granted, the LSD was not in every year.
1987 tsi is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2007, 06:52 AM   #41
Re: Chrylser COnquest?  
Super Moderator

 
bansheenut420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Here...

My Ride: 92 White IROC RT
Engine: 2.2 L T-3
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 4,163
Feedback: (4)
Images: 119
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1987 tsi View Post
here is mine by the way


VERY nice car!
__________________
Cory Hedin

I have a non-running T3 car! Woot for lifting the head!
-92' White IROC RT PVP Pilot Car <---- page newly updated.
-87' Daytona Shelby Z W/ T tops <---- page under construction :D
bansheenut420 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2007, 07:56 AM   #42
Re: Chrylser COnquest?  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: buffalo new york

My Ride: 86 glh-t
Engine: 2.2 turbo
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 14.196

Posts: 331
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1987 tsi View Post
Exaclty true......To talk about how something is a POS without actually understanding it, isn't right. Just cause someone bought a car ran the piss out of it and it did not hold up to there abuse.....come on....don't blame it on the car. Just like (almost) any motor, build it to take the abuse. A 2.6 is a strong motor. Came from the factory with steel crank and rods. The weak point of it and why everyone bashes it was for the head problems. Fix that and work with the TBI (cause that is what you have. Or spend the money and go MPI. I have personally put over 20,000 miles on my build in the last year and a half. I run it with the boost set at 20-21psi and I have not had to put a wrench on it. Will I? Sure. But that is what I built it for. FUN damn it. LOL

I want to also add that I am in NO WAY comparing the g54b to the 4g63. The 4g63 has proven itself time and time again.

The rear suspension is an Indepedant set up with a 3.54 LSD. granted, the LSD was not in every year.
congratulations on having the rarest color of the starquests. still prtial to the fiji though. i myself have owned two of them and done all work necessary on them. They are very nitpicky cars that need to be maintained properly in order to be enjoyable. if it's hacked together....well you know garbage in garbage out. These cars are getting harder and harder to find clean. frame rails go like mad on them due to a/c drain. wheel wells rot out and rocker panels go form the inside out. Best thing to do with starquests is 1. make sure your injector clips are good, and if they are good don't mess with them. 2. Go through the cooling system and make sure EVERYTHING is in proper working order otherwsie you will run hot. (mine after going through never got above half) ........god i miss mine now, thanks alot. o speaking of i have some parts here.....anybody need em?
psychopjv is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2007, 07:59 AM   #43
Re: Chrylser COnquest?  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: missouri

My Ride: 1987 Conquest TSI
Engine: 2.6
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.230

Posts: 20
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by psychopjv View Post
congratulations on having the rarest color of the starquests. still prtial to the fiji though. i myself have owned two of them and done all work necessary on them. They are very nitpicky cars that need to be maintained properly in order to be enjoyable. if it's hacked together....well you know garbage in garbage out. These cars are getting harder and harder to find clean. frame rails go like mad on them due to a/c drain. wheel wells rot out and rocker panels go form the inside out. Best thing to do with starquests is 1. make sure your injector clips are good, and if they are good don't mess with them. 2. Go through the cooling system and make sure EVERYTHING is in proper working order otherwsie you will run hot. (mine after going through never got above half) ........god i miss mine now, thanks alot. o speaking of i have some parts here.....anybody need em?
What do you got? And actually mine is not the rarest color. Mine is the Atlantic blue. I believe you speak of the Balt Blue car. Not many of those known to be around. maybe 10 at the most. The Altantic blue is a rarer color being that mitsu did not like blue.
1987 tsi is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2007, 08:21 AM   #44
Re: Chrylser COnquest?  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: buffalo new york

My Ride: 86 glh-t
Engine: 2.2 turbo
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 14.196

Posts: 331
Feedback: (0)
i have a 1986 dodge omni glh-t and a 1999 30th anniversary trans am. i owned an 88 chrysler conquest and an 88 mitsu starion. quest had SHP package with fucntioning suspension but was a total basket case and had lots of rot. she got crushed because it got put on a lift and started to fold due to rust. starion was another beater of sorts but very fun. hacked paint job motor was fantastic though. had trouble keeping auto's together in that one. Now after reading this i see you meant what parts....looks like i have some fog lights, window regulators, some coolant lines....
psychopjv is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2007, 08:31 AM   #45
Re: Chrylser COnquest?  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: missouri

My Ride: 1987 Conquest TSI
Engine: 2.6
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.230

Posts: 20
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by psychopjv View Post
i have a 1986 dodge omni glh-t and a 1999 30th anniversary trans am. i owned an 88 chrysler conquest and an 88 mitsu starion. quest had SHP package with fucntioning suspension but was a total basket case and had lots of rot. she got crushed because it got put on a lift and started to fold due to rust. starion was another beater of sorts but very fun. hacked paint job motor was fantastic though. had trouble keeping auto's together in that one. Now after reading this i see you meant what parts....looks like i have some fog lights, window regulators, some coolant lines....
LOL ya parts...but was curious about all the rest too.
1987 tsi is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

» Quick Nav
- Home
- Classifieds
- Timeslips
- Gallery
- Vendors
-- Directory
- Tech Articles
- Donate
Sponsors
remove ads

» Dodge Turbo Chat
Title, Username, & Date
plenum size
Smoker
89 Shadow es