TurboDodge.com MarketPlace Shelby Registry Contact Us

Advertisement - Remove these ads today by clicking here.
 

Go Back   TurboDodge.Com - Turbo Dodge forum for Turbo Mopars, Shelbys, Daytona, SRT-4, PT Cruiser, Omni and more! > Turbo specific > Other Turbo Vehicles

Other Turbo Vehicles Other turbocharged vehicle technical section.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools

Old 05-21-2008, 08:38 PM   #16
Re: 97 Talon TSI AWD, TRANSFERCASE broken  
NAJ
Human Factory Service Manual
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Jersey

My Ride: 1990 Daytona Shelby
Engine: 2.2 L VNT
1/4: 15.570

Posts: 3,626
Feedback: (3)
Well then you should call the dealer/Chrysler and fight the battle for them.
I do not know what your dealer is doing but after working for Chrysler for 13 years I know for a FACT that a recall cannot be done twice, Chrysler will charge the dealer back.
If your dealer is doing things like that you may be happy but they will not when Chrysler comes in for thier surprise Service Audit and they go over every record for the last 3-5 years and Chrysler ends up billing them back for not having dotted thier i's and crossing thier t's and the dealer ends up owing them $100,000 or more. Seen it happen.
So unless you work for Chrysler and know first hand what the service dept. goes thru with Chrysler on warranty claims and resticted parts do not be so smug.
Besides, after 10 years how would you prove it was the recalled seal that was the leak and not something else, also part of every lube, oil, filter is checking ALL fluid levels and on a RWD,4WD,AWD that includes the differentials and transfer case. If you or your repair facility are not doing that do not blame Chrysler.
Perfect example of customer abuse/lack of mantainance is when the engine develops knocking/loss of oil pressure etc on a vehicle with 20- 25 k and when the vehicle is checked the factory installed oil filter is still on there.Chrysler does not cover that under warranty. All Chrysler vehicles come from the factory with an oil filter that is stamped "Factory Installed".
The customer/owner of the vehicle is responsible for maintainance and if that is not performed as stated in the maintainance schedule in the owners manual how is that Chryslers fault?
NAJ is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2008, 09:48 PM   #17
Re: 97 Talon TSI AWD, TRANSFERCASE broken  
Boostaholic
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Wilmington, Ohio

My Ride: 05 srt4,87 omni drag
Engine: 2.4,2.2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 506
Feedback: (0)
Images: 13
I know gm has some special policies that extend the coverage on certain things. But even these arent made public, and only the dealer nows about them. For example, the 1994-1997 s-10 with the 2.2 four cylinder would get a free head gasket change if it was leaking. This was only good for 100k mileage and 8 years I believe. Maybe chrysler had a special policy on those transfercases, but I would think 10 years is a bit much to get it for free.
james
jrbisig is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2008, 08:51 PM   #18
Re: 97 Talon TSI AWD, TRANSFERCASE broken  
Boostaholic
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: SE Michigan

My Ride: 1994 Dodge Shadow
Engine: 3.0 6G72
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 14.500

Posts: 440
Feedback: (0)
Actually, I do work for a Chrysler dealership. And we've had those surpirse audits..... and they found nothing other than a few clerigal errors.

I'm not trying to be smug... just stating that it's been signed off on and okay-ed. There's also members of the local DSM board who went to different dealers here in MI and they also got the recalls done succussfully after already been done. Do the dealers advertise that there are recalls on cars over a certain age? No... but to those owners who know about them, they *usually* can get them done.... or maybe just in Michigan?

I think for them its worth thier time to fight for it.... I
dodgeshadowchik is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2008, 08:55 PM   #19
Re: 97 Talon TSI AWD, TRANSFERCASE broken  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: erie, pa

My Ride: CSX-T
Engine: 2.2 T1
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 291
Feedback: (0)
Images: 1
It is the audits that they call you in advance to tell you they are going to do one. That was the kind of audit of clerical errors that cost me $50,000.00. Chrysler changed their policy shortly after my audit. They now do the audit, advise the dealer where the errors are, give 90 days to correct the dealership's evil ways, and then monitor all the stuff they audited.

Given your location, you may be in a favorable area for some long term recall warranty policy adjustments. I would not allow a new repair on a recall item unless the customer is paying or a prior work approval is obtained from our rep. And some of those PWA's are not worth the breath they are spoken with.
ljbprrfmof is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2008, 09:15 PM   #20
Re: 97 Talon TSI AWD, TRANSFERCASE broken  
Boostaholic
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: SE Michigan

My Ride: 1994 Dodge Shadow
Engine: 3.0 6G72
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 14.500

Posts: 440
Feedback: (0)
It is what it is, I guess. But it's getting this thread off topic. I just wanted to let them know that it was a possiblity, that's all.

I would think that they would keep covering it just for the fact that an accident deemed to be the fault of a recalled part could result in a lawsuit in these sue-happy days. I did find this from safercar.gov, so this may be why some dealers still cover it.
"All other safety recalls are in effect for the life of the product. "
ODI - Office of Defects Investigation

Both the dsm recalls are considered safety ones due to the fact if the t-case fails due to the faulty yoke seal (leaks out) or the ball joints seperate, they can cause an accident.

Last edited by dodgeshadowchik : 05-23-2008 at 09:38 AM.
dodgeshadowchik is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2008, 02:03 PM   #21
Re: 97 Talon TSI AWD, TRANSFERCASE broken  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Austin,TX

My Ride: 92 Dodge Stealth RT
Engine: 3.0 6G72 Twin Turbo
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 15
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by dodgeshadowchik View Post
It is what it is, I guess. But it's getting this thread off topic. I just wanted to let them know that it was a possiblity, that's all.

I would think that they would keep covering it just for the fact that an accident deemed to be the fault of a recalled part could result in a lawsuit in these sue-happy days. I did find this from safercar.gov, so this may be why some dealers still cover it.
"All other safety recalls are in effect for the life of the product. "
ODI - Office of Defects Investigation

Both the dsm recalls are considered safety ones due to the fact if the t-case fails due to the faulty yoke seal (leaks out) or the ball joints seperate, they can cause an accident.
Same transfer case recall applies to the 3000GT/Dodge stealth and also has been a major issue. i tried to get mine re-sealed or replaced even though the recall was done (some dealers will honor this still) and i was basically told to "**** off" in a nice way. best bet is to just get yourself another transfercase from a junkyard and open it up, clean it all up and inspect in and then RE-SEAL it yourself with brand new seals.

I did this on mine for my dodge stealth and was able to get some seals from NAPA (transfer case input sleeve seal and driveshaft yoke seal) and then the rest i used RTV (The right stuff by permatex) and it hasn;t leaked a drop since. the seals from napa are actually better quality IMO than the leaky OEM ones.

Anyway, good luck
rush6432 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2008, 03:24 PM   #22
Re: 97 Talon TSI AWD, TRANSFERCASE broken  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: whereIcan

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 413
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by gkcooper View Post
I was told that the DSM AWD transfer cases had extended warranties on them. Apparently, very extended. Parts only though, so you will still have to yank it out. You may at least call your local Mitsubishi store and find out for sure.
I wish. I had mine run out of fluid after a dealer "checked" it's level indicating it was full and it locked up and killing it two days later. The second dealer I took it to said either pay $800 installed or tow it to the boneyard T.S. about the other shitty dealer's incompetance. So much for an "extended warranty". This was on a recalled part but who has the time to sue for $800.
turbo.shaft is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

» Quick Nav
- Home
- Classifieds
- Timeslips
- Gallery
- Vendors
-- Directory
- Tech Articles
- Donate
Sponsors
remove ads

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1
MySpace Images | Credit Cards | Car Insurance | Nike Shoes | Debt Loans


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:44 AM.

Page generated in 0.34075 seconds with 13 queries