 |
|
  |
 |
09-19-2004, 04:44 PM
|
#16
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: PA
My Ride: 88 Shadow
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
 Quote:
|
Originally Posted by omnivore
Remember ANY intercooler is better than no intercooler. SO fit what you can in there, even if you have to top mount and hood scoop it Subaru style.
|
  |
Not to a diesel. Gas engine yes, diesel no. A restrictive IC will yield less HP output than no intercooler at all.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
09-21-2004, 06:41 AM
|
#17
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: San Antonio Tx
My Ride: '87 T-bird
Engine: 2.3l Turbo
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 15.300
|
Go check out http://www.gm-diesel.com and look at their forums. They have all sorts of info for what you can safely do to those motors.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
09-22-2004, 10:52 AM
|
#19
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Abbotsford, BC, Canada
My Ride: 1989 Turbo Caravan
Engine: 2.5L 8V Sohc
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.400
|
 Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dwh4784
Are these things as gutless as the old 6.9L Ford deisel(non turbo)? We had an 86 and lordy....i bet my New Yorker could out pull it. Deisels have come a long way in recent years.
|
  |
No, he puts a camper on it, I don't know how long but it sticks over the tailgate and he has a long box, and he tows a 20 ft boat with ease, and still gets 14 mpg. The truck is heavy, ex cab, long box, 4x4 and the 4L80E trans.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
09-22-2004, 03:23 PM
|
#20
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: PA
My Ride: 88 Shadow
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
Well the 6.5's still don't have that much power...but yes far better than any N/A ford diesel IE the 6.9 and 7.3 N/A. The 6.2 chevy in the 80's was THE WORST, it has 150 HP. Atleast the 6.9 has 170. The 6.5 turbo has 190 HP, but much better torque simply because of the turbo.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
09-22-2004, 06:49 PM
|
#21
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: San Antonio Tx
My Ride: '87 T-bird
Engine: 2.3l Turbo
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 15.300
|
 Quote:
|
Originally Posted by moparzrule
Well the 6.5's still don't have that much power...but yes far better than any N/A ford diesel IE the 6.9 and 7.3 N/A. The 6.2 chevy in the 80's was THE WORST, it has 150 HP. Atleast the 6.9 has 170. The 6.5 turbo has 190 HP, but much better torque simply because of the turbo.
|
  |
the 6.2 has an advertised HP of 155.
My truck will squeal the tires if I floor it from a stop sign.. But then again it has 4.10 ratio axles and a TH400.
-Chris
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
09-22-2004, 07:40 PM
|
#22
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: PA
My Ride: 88 Shadow
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
Well once it has 100K+ miles on it, I bet it's only 150 HP. LOL
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
09-22-2004, 08:45 PM
|
#26
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: San Antonio Tx
My Ride: '87 T-bird
Engine: 2.3l Turbo
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 15.300
|
My truck has 217k on the clock. Very little blowby. No hard starts. No nothing.  I better not say anything else though, somethin bad might happen.
Only mods this truck has every had is the original mufflers taken out for some redline strait through mufflers.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
09-23-2004, 06:31 AM
|
#27
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: PA
My Ride: 88 Shadow
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
 Quote:
|
Originally Posted by crashgordon56
to prevent detonation.
|
  |
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
09-23-2004, 06:53 AM
|
#28
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: San Antonio Tx
My Ride: '87 T-bird
Engine: 2.3l Turbo
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 15.300
|
 Quote:
|
Originally Posted by crashgordon56
they lack an intercooler they run much less boost to prevent detonation..
|
  |
That's why a diesel sounds like a diesel. It's detonating. That's how it runs.
They lack an intercooler because gm is just cheap sometimes or probably figured that some average joe would come along and see turbo an figure that it would be as good as a Powerstroke or cummins.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
09-23-2004, 11:23 AM
|
#30
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Abbotsford, BC, Canada
My Ride: 1989 Turbo Caravan
Engine: 2.5L 8V Sohc
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.400
|
That is a good one, detonate, hahhaaa.
anyhow, my brothers truck has 330,000 km's and still running strong. Compression is good, starts no problem, no smoke or blowby either, getting noisey but still way quieter than a Cummin's.
Its probably had 2 or 3 injection pumps though but that was before he bought it. He's had it 2 yrs and no pump problems yet, knock on wood, lol!
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Quick Nav |
|
» Quick Tech |
|
» Market Place |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|