TurboDodge.com MarketPlace Shelby Registry Contact Us

Advertisement - Remove these ads today by clicking here.
 

Go Back   TurboDodge.Com - Turbo Dodge forum for Turbo Mopars, Shelbys, Daytona, SRT-4, PT Cruiser, Omni and more! > Turbo specific > Carburetted and TBI Injected

Carburetted and TBI Injected Feel free to discuss any subject that is specific to these cars, including but not limited to: modification, tuning, repair, parts replacement, identification and restoration. This is the place to talk about ALL-MOTOR performance and MPI conversions.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools

Old 11-18-2005, 09:52 AM   #1
trans computers... calling all mopar engineers/gurus  
Boostaholic
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: PirateSwashbucklers.awesome

My Ride: 88 Plymouth Reliant
Engine: 2.5L T2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,768
Feedback: (0)
Ok, I was on allpar the one day and asked a question whether i could use the newer autostick trans ecu on my 1990 A-604 that i have in my K car and someone said the communications between the engine ecm and the trans ecm was different.

can anyone verify whether there is a autostick trans computer that is compatible with my 1990 SBEC? I need to control the shifts a little better for in the winter.

Brian
Aries_Turbo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2005, 12:20 PM   #2
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kokomo, IN

My Ride: '92 Dodge Spirit R/T
Engine: Turbo III 2.2L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 14.500

Posts: 480
Feedback: (0)
Brian,

I don't believe that Autostick was developed until around '96 or so and as a result, the earlier controllers aren't equipped to handle it. Since it was so late, I doubt there are any that would be compatable with your '90 SBEC. I don't know much about the software side but that's my guess.
Fleckster is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2005, 12:48 PM   #3
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Hagerstown, MD

My Ride: 88 sundance
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,955
Feedback: (0)
I think maybe the guys at www.dodgeintrepid.net could help more. Some of them know alot about those trans. The a606 is essentially the same. I know alot of those guys swap in the autostick into the earlier models, but I think going to 90 may be a little work. I think they say that the BCM is different and I dont think your car even has a BCM.
jdawg is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2005, 12:59 PM   #4
 
Boostaholic
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: PirateSwashbucklers.awesome

My Ride: 88 Plymouth Reliant
Engine: 2.5L T2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,768
Feedback: (0)
yeah I thought of asking over there. i have a 97 autostick trans pcm from an intrepid already but since it shouldnt be able to communicate with the sbec to get the correct engine information, it prolly wont work. thats unfortunate. i wanted to put some autostick shift buttons on the end of the stock column shifter.

I wonder if I got a 95 caravan harness if it would be able to communicate with the 97 pcm...

I also need a new solenoid pack. mines a little sticky to shift into first when I put the lever in drive. it works well still under most conditions.

yeah there is no body computer on a k car lol. I dont even have the trans pcm test connectors. I gotta splice them into the harness near the pcm itself.

there also a megashift aftermarket trans computer in development for the 4L60E Gm box.... I bet I could adapt it to the 604 but I guarantee that it would POUND into the gears cause it doesnt do the 'clicky, clicky' dance. it just says "ok, 4th NOW <bang>" lol. i wonder if it would break stuff. I can just drop a 670 in it if I break the 604.

Thanks guys

Brian
Aries_Turbo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2005, 01:03 PM   #5
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: minivan by a creek

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 3,590
Feedback: (2)
if you have the computer, put it in and try. at worst case, the trans will be in limp-in
allmotor is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2005, 01:15 PM   #6
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Hagerstown, MD

My Ride: 88 sundance
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,955
Feedback: (0)
what about 97 caravan electronics? At least you could get the pcm close eng displacement wise. You bolted an a604 to a 2.5? I dodnt know they would match.
jdawg is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2005, 01:15 PM   #7
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Hagerstown, MD

My Ride: 88 sundance
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,955
Feedback: (0)
I meant you could get 2.4 in the NS bodies
jdawg is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2005, 02:29 PM   #8
 
Old School Hot Rodder
 
85lebaront2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newport News, Va

My Ride: 1985 LeBaron Vert
Engine: MOPAR 2.2L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 954
Feedback: (0)
At worst case, you can rig up a manual control system for it. All the shifts are controlled by solenoids on the front side of the tranaxle. When testing one of these, the test box allows manual selection of the gears for diagnosis.
__________________
Bill Vose
Old School Hot Rodder
"Growing old is inevitable, growing up is optional"
1985 LeBaron Mark Cross convertible 2.2L TurboII
1986 Turismo 2.2 (race car)
1986 LeBaron convertible 2.2L TBI (dead)
1986 F350 Crew Cab DRW
1989 J body coupe 2.5L TurboI (parts car)
1989 J body convertible 2.5L TurboI (wrecked in front, granddaughter's car)
1993 Grand Caravan 3.3L
1995 Lincoln Continental (project car)
http://www.oldschoolhotrodder.com
85lebaront2 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2005, 03:14 PM   #9
 
Boostaholic
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: PirateSwashbucklers.awesome

My Ride: 88 Plymouth Reliant
Engine: 2.5L T2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,768
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by allmotor
if you have the computer, put it in and try. at worst case, the trans will be in limp-in
yeah i might do that tonight if I get some time.

Brian
Aries_Turbo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2005, 03:15 PM   #10
 
Boostaholic
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: PirateSwashbucklers.awesome

My Ride: 88 Plymouth Reliant
Engine: 2.5L T2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,768
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdawg
what about 97 caravan electronics? At least you could get the pcm close eng displacement wise. You bolted an a604 to a 2.5? I dodnt know they would match.
i have a 3.0L a604 combo in the k car... I could use 3.0L caravan newer electronics but is it really worth it... I dont think so.

Brian
Aries_Turbo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2005, 03:41 PM   #11
 
Boostaholic
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: PirateSwashbucklers.awesome

My Ride: 88 Plymouth Reliant
Engine: 2.5L T2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,768
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 85lebaront2
At worst case, you can rig up a manual control system for it. All the shifts are controlled by solenoids on the front side of the tranaxle. When testing one of these, the test box allows manual selection of the gears for diagnosis.
yeah I know I could do something with like that but it will nail each gear when the stock control of the 604 is all about smooth. I also wonder about the timing to prevent flares. example... to go from 1 to 2, im assuming that Id take power from #1 solenoid and hit the #2 solenoid with power and the same from 2-3 and 3-4. i have a feeling that the megashift trans controller might be perfect for this application though i wonder about how harsh a downshift will be. the stocker seems to release a gear and let the engine rev and then close in on the lower gear when the speeds are about right. it is designed for a 4T60E which is somewhat similar as i think it has a solenoid for each gear like the 604.

I dunno. I like a firm shift, but I dont like a scary BANG that sounds like things will break lol.

I suppose I could use some simple digital counter chips to make a full manual sequential paddle shift setup to drive 4 solenoids and then a manual TC lockup circuit for the highway with auto disengage when the TPS gets above a certain level.

Now im getting all crazy lol.

Brian
Aries_Turbo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2005, 04:18 PM   #12
 
Boostaholic
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: PirateSwashbucklers.awesome

My Ride: 88 Plymouth Reliant
Engine: 2.5L T2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,768
Feedback: (0)
ok I have the fluid diagrams. Im going to figure out what id have to do to make a sequential manual controller for the trans.

Brian
Aries_Turbo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2005, 12:18 PM   #13
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Carlisle PA

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,055
Feedback: (0)
Brian how is the manual controller going?

Daniel Merrill
89acclaim is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2005, 12:42 PM   #14
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: minivan by a creek

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 3,590
Feedback: (2)
I found this article http://www.transonline.com/transDige...ing/index.html
allmotor is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2005, 01:44 PM   #15
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Carlisle PA

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,055
Feedback: (0)
In fact I just found this might be helpful.
http://forums.neons.org/viewtopic.ph...ght=%2A4spd%2A
It makes me think, "The gear train is really HD compared to the 413 stuff." Makes sence since it was designed with a minivan in mind instead of a omni.

Daniel Merrill
89acclaim is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

» Quick Nav
- Home
- Classifieds
- Timeslips
- Gallery
- Vendors
-- Directory
- Tech Articles
- Donate
Sponsors
remove ads

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1
e Harmony | Car Credit | Loans | Internet Advertising | Loans


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:59 PM.

Page generated in 0.56103 seconds with 13 queries