 |
|
  |
 |
06-10-2006, 10:16 PM
|
#1
|
  |
|
Will a 2.5 TBI live with a stock turbo conversion?
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: PA
My Ride: 1987 BMW 325es
Engine: 2.7 I6
Induct: N/A
1/4: 0.000
|
Can I put a complete stock conversion turbo I unit (hard parts, turbo, electrical, etc) on a stock 2.5 TBI engine and expect it to last? Has anyone tried this ? This is on a 1989 Daytona 5 speed with 1993 engine. Conversion parts will be all Mopar from a 1990 Daytona turbo car. I know it can be done but will the motor last for any length of time? 
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
06-11-2006, 02:50 PM
|
#4
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: S. Central PA
My Ride: '91 Spirit R/T
Engine: 2.2 TIII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
According to Corky Bell, practically any engine can withstand 7 psi boost without reliability issues. Your tip-in throttle response will be what you have now, then it only gets better.
Mike
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
06-11-2006, 07:26 PM
|
#5
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
My Ride: 85 Charger
Engine: 2.2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
^He said "tip in", but forgot "big grin in" response, hehe!
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
06-11-2006, 09:03 PM
|
#6
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: May 2005
Location: London Canada
My Ride: 84 Plymouth Turismo
Engine: 89 2.5 I/C TURBO
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
Hmm was there a 2.2 turbo with sbec put on a 90's and up MoPar?...without the twin cam that is
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
06-11-2006, 10:59 PM
|
#7
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: pittsburgh, PA
My Ride: 90 daytona shelby
Engine: 2.5 intercooled
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 14.400
|
i had my car with a n/a 2.5 engine with all the turbo parts bolted onto it last year and it was great. but i then got greedy and kept turning the boost up. just run stock boost with stock timing and always fill it with 94 oct. it spooled up super fast and had tire melting low end. finally blew after 2 months of 20psi.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
06-12-2006, 07:00 AM
|
#9
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Peterborough, Ontario
My Ride: 89 Chrysler Daytona
Engine: 88 2.2 T1-T2 upgrade
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 15.800
|
 Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Robb
Hmm was there a 2.2 turbo with sbec put on a 90's and up MoPar?...without the twin cam that is
|
  |
There is lots of 8v 2.5's with the sbec 90+
The only 8v 2.2 I can think of is the vnt tona's/shadows
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
06-12-2006, 12:16 PM
|
#10
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Manitoba, Canada
Induct: Turbo + Nitrous
1/4: 0.000
|
Well the 86-88 2.2 T1's used the 659g leightweight rod, the same rod as the tbi 2.2's. The tbi rods in your 2.5 are of the same weight, but according to my book, a different part number, though the rods are probably the same, or pretty darn close. Pistons will hold up, but have a smaller dish, and therefore, higher compression. I'd recommend a head shim and I'd also throw on a G head, cuts off about .5:1 compression. The turbo G heads are getting kinda hard to find though, seeing as they were only made in 84 and 85. I've heard guys saying they were pushing 250hp with the LW rods, but if they fail you can only blame yourself, lol.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
06-12-2006, 05:33 PM
|
#12
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Manitoba, Canada
Induct: Turbo + Nitrous
1/4: 0.000
|
 Quote:
|
Originally Posted by turbulence
Would running 2.5 electronics help by having a less aggressive spark curve? you'd need to decrease fuel pressure or run smaller injectors I would think?
Martin
89 Horizon
|
  |
Are you talking about running 2.5 electronics T1 with a turbo on a tbi 2.2 shortblock? If so, I wouldn't. I'd just run the 2.2 electronics but lower the base timing on the distributor rather than messing with fuel pressure.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
06-13-2006, 02:33 PM
|
#15
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Manitoba, Canada
Induct: Turbo + Nitrous
1/4: 0.000
|
turbulence, while it'll work, personally, I would pick up a 2.2 T2 sbec and run it. IMO might as well have what the factory intended for that application. The money and time you'd spend hooking up an adjustable fuel pressure regulator, fuel pressure gauge and whatever device you are using to determine what your fuel pressure should be you could just get a T2 computer, plus make a couple bucks selling your T1 computer. Then you'll also have optimal fuel and timing curves. The 2.5 computer w/ adjustable reg will be close, but IMO if you're gonna do it, might as well do it right. Just my $.02, good luck.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Quick Nav |
|
» Quick Tech |
|
» Market Place |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|