TurboDodge.com MarketPlace Shelby Registry Contact Us

Advertisement - Remove these ads today by clicking here.
 

Go Back   TurboDodge.Com - Turbo Dodge forum for Turbo Mopars, Shelbys, Daytona, SRT-4, PT Cruiser, Omni and more! > Turbo specific > Carburetted and TBI Injected

Carburetted and TBI Injected Feel free to discuss any subject that is specific to these cars, including but not limited to: modification, tuning, repair, parts replacement, identification and restoration. This is the place to talk about ALL-MOTOR performance and MPI conversions.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools

Old 08-27-2006, 05:11 AM   #16
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Port Richey FL

My Ride: 94 Plymouth Duster
Engine: 6g72 181c.i.d.
Induct: N/A
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,091
Feedback: (0)
don't the 2.7's have plastic intake manifolds?
DustyR/T is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2006, 09:50 AM   #17
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: wisconsin rapids, WI

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,699
Feedback: (2)
here's what I've discovered is causing the failure on the 2.7 in the LH cars. doesn't apply to the Sebring. in the LH cars the PCV valve is located in the intake, this causes the valve to sludge due to being cool and condensing moisture/oil vapor = sludge. w/o PVC, the oil sludges in the engine causing a lot of failure. seems that common problem on the 2.7 is cam seizing destroying timing chain, and bottom end bearing failure. Synth is definitely a good idea as it does not sludge. Parafin based oils (aka pennzoil/quakerstate) would be the worst choice to use in these engines especially in cold weather climates. I'm sure Daimler will not back this engineering problem.
22dodge is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2006, 08:09 PM   #18
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: S. Central PA

My Ride: '91 Spirit R/T
Engine: 2.2 TIII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,516
Feedback: (0)
For a potent performance mod, remove the heads and open up the exhaust ports. Chryco intentionally choked the exhaust as part of NOx controll. Should give 20-25 HP or so.

Mike
www.PowreHaus.com
mpgmike is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2006, 11:13 PM   #19
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Minnesota

My Ride: 1992 Dodge Daytona
Engine: 2.5l I-4 super 60
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 2,332
Feedback: (0)
I myself have done some extensive work in rebuilding the Chrysler 2.7s with much success so far.

The number 1 gossip item regarding its failure is the water pump design, which is internal to the engine and driven by the timing chain. Well, you guessed it--possible coolant contamination. However, the water pump does incorporate a weep hole to allow coolant to drain outside the engine by the thermostat housing. Its not like these engines are guaranteed to fail as the water pump seal degrades slowly over time. Now, it would be possible for it to happen in such a situation (which I've seen many times) where the water pump bearings go out, so the pump no longer functions the way it should anymore, and since it has no bearings supporting the impeller shaft, the water pump seal isn't going to seal, and yah, the coolant gush is going to be more than the weep passage can flow, so it does go right into the engine oil. In the mean time, the engine is running with a misfire due to the cam timing going whacky, a CHECK ENGINE light, and timing chain/water pump noise that gets put off until the coolant contamination does take its toll, assuming it did not overheat and kill something else in the mean time.
Do note that the GM Quad 4 has essentially the same water pump setup as a chrysler 2.7. The pump is outside of the engine, but the chance of it leaking into the crankcase is the same, minus a gasket that could possibly leak one day. I don't hear anyone crabbing about the Quad 4 water pumps leaking coolant into the oil. Unless I haven't been listening enough.

Also, think you're 2.7l is rod knocking? The 2000+ engines have an updated timing chain tensioner design which likes to blow its O-ring that seals oil pressure behind it. When this happens, the tensioner can no longer do its job, and the primary timing chain rattles and makes a noise darn near identical to rod bearing failure. Wonder why that O-ring blows out? These engines produce 125+ PSI of oil pressure when cold at 6,000 RPM. Also, if this seal blows, oil pressure to the rest of the engine kinda takes a hit as well. If fixed in a reasonable amount of time (day or so) its no big deal. Let it go, and its very hard on the chain. First thing to do is pull the pan to look for debris. That'll tell you if you need a new engine or not.

The intake manifold and PCV valve placement between the LH and the JR cars iare identical. Gunk does tend to build up inside these manifolds, but I have never found a PCV valve to be plugged up, yet. HOWEVER, every one I've fixed/rebuilt had a deteriorated PCV hose. They either had large holes in the underside of them, or have totally collapsed. So, this can undoubtedly result in some kind of oil breakdown.

I'm not saying it does not happen, but I have never seen or heard of a camshaft seizing on a 2.7L yet. All the heads have been trouble-free. No cracks, no warping, etc. Water pumps sieze and snap the timing chain though. When the chain snaps, piston will meet valve unless you get lucky.

In my opinion, there is more than one contributing factor to the 2.7L failures.

1.) is the deteriorating PCV hose. It must have some kind of effect on the oil inside, and its probably not a positive effect. Proper visual maintenance will notice this.

2.) Ever run a 2.7l at high RPM with the front cover removed? You can watch the oil level in the pan drop substancially as RPMs increase. Upper end with 4 cams, 24 lash adjusters, oil pressure accumulators, two secondary timing chain tensioners, 100+ psi of oil pressure, there's a LOT of oil floating around in the heads of these things. You cannot run them without valve covers without shooting oil across the garage. Trust me, I've tried. Imagine Joe Schmoe who's never checked his oil in the last 4,000 miles runs it to 5500 RPM on a steep hill while 2.5 quarts low on oil with a pan design that doesn't have a sump for the oil pickup. HMMMM. Maintain your oil level.

3.) Neglect. All engines will sludge if you neglect them. You can walk through the junk yards and find engines of all genere sludged up. Usually caused by lack of maintenance and/or faulty PCV systems. Never have I found the oil pickup tube clogged full of sludge. Thats the cleanest part of these engines. All the supply passages are were clean and clear. The oil returns may have been restricted a bit, but not enough to be the root cause of oil starvation. Change the oil sometime in the next 10,000 miles and use good oil.

The 2.7L is a quiet engine. If its making any kind of noise, don't put it off. Get it checked by someone who doesn't just say the 2.7L is junk and you need a new engine. I'll save a $2700 engine by buying a $1.04 O-ring.

My last rebuild 2.7 has 5,000 miles on it now. I pulled the valve cover recently and inside there isn't the slightest indication sludge buildup. I use 10w30 conventional valvoline. Runs/sounds awesome. It better though. It needed $1850 in parts alone!! Yeeouch!

Anyways, </Rant>
phantomrt is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2006, 08:18 AM   #20
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Feb 2005

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,052
Feedback: (0)
wtf was that supposed to mean?

the stick was an option on sedans and very few coupes.... ive only seen one coupe and that was a sebring of all things.... and there are at least 15 chrysler dealerships in my area... it was a special order

Quote:
Originally Posted by 89acclaim
XxhorizonxX How about at the bottom of this page http://www.wildflowersgallery.com/ and this one http://cars.kbb.com/go/search/detail...13&aff=carskbb
And if you check out KBB.com they have it as an option on the cars. Yeah the older cars having a 5spd in the base with a 2.0L.
I think that a 3.5L with the 5spd would be nice. hummm maybe in a couple years when they are cheaper.

Daniel Merrill
XxhorizonxX is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2006, 09:41 AM   #21
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Hagerstown, MD

My Ride: 88 sundance
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,955
Feedback: (0)
WTF are we talking about here? Performance mods? Swap in a 3.2/3.5. Put in 300m special gears or even better Prowler gears. Then with the 3.5 engine you could fab up stuff and use a supercharger from a Prowler.

http://www.dodgeintrepid.net/forums/...splay.php?f=18
jdawg is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2006, 07:44 PM   #22
 
Boostaholic
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: west wareham, massachusetts

My Ride: 89 Daytona Shelby
Engine: 2.5L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 853
Feedback: (1)
the 2.7L could come with a 5spd. tranny. i forget what year range it was, but chrysler came back out with the GTC badge for them cars. one of the options was a 5spd. manny behind the 2.7L. theres one possibility. you could always go standalone and just put some forced induction on it....

Scott
89Waredaytona is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2006, 08:53 AM   #23
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: lafayette,indiana

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 13
Feedback: (0)
My wife's '02 Stratus R/T sedan has a 2.7 w/ 5spd. A bit more fun to drive,but no rocketship..it certainly is no power match for my R/T, but it sure will outhandle it!!
rtdaytona is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

» Quick Nav
- Home
- Classifieds
- Timeslips
- Gallery
- Vendors
-- Directory
- Tech Articles
- Donate
Sponsors
remove ads

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1
Insurance Articles Directory | Homeowner Loans | New York Hotels | Credit Card | Personal Loans


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:32 PM.

Page generated in 0.51288 seconds with 13 queries