TurboDodge.com MarketPlace Shelby Registry Contact Us

Advertisement - Remove these ads today by clicking here.
 

Go Back   TurboDodge.Com - Turbo Dodge forum for Turbo Mopars, Shelbys, Daytona, SRT-4, PT Cruiser, Omni and more! > Turbo specific > Supercharged 2.2 / 2.5s

Supercharged 2.2 / 2.5s Discussion of performance and maintenance specific to supercharging a 2.2 or 2.5.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools

Old 10-30-2005, 03:44 PM   #1
Supercharged 16V Hybrid  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Holt, Mi

My Ride: 1981 Triumh TR7
Engine: none!
Induct: S/C
1/4: 999.999

Posts: 12
Feedback: (0)
I am building a toy for the Grassroots Motorsports $2006.00 Challenge and I think a few on this forum might like it (a few will likely hate it as well) but the basics are pretty simple. I have collected a bunch of parts from other peoples Challenge trips and am in the process of building a fun lightweight autocrosser that can be driven 24/7.

Basically I have a 2.2L T2 short block that is currently getting a 420A head with Neon cams. Instead of turbocharging it I intend to supercharge it using an Eaton M90 and a Thunderbird Super Coupe intercooler. A Megasquirt w/ EDIS control package will squirt 92 octane through 70 lb injectors. A custom header will be made because I am waaaay too smart to try and use a Dakota manifold for this project . A Dakota bellhousing will be modified (and spaced) to accept a Mustang T5 transmission which has a Pro 5.0 shifter. The driveshaft is going to need to be modified to accept the Triumph rear axle.

Yes I said Triumph. Specifically a 1981 Triumph TR7 DHC (Convertible) that has had a majority of the big issues worked out of it and is in the minor need of a winters long ass whoopin to get it into shape!

So there you have it. A Ford supercharged Dodge powered little British car... wait for the updates as they come in... I promise they will be sick.

John
quasimofo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2005, 06:35 PM   #2
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: www.TurboDodge.com

My Ride: 1986 Plymouth Horizo
Engine: 2.2 Turbo
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 11.705

Posts: 2,548
Feedback: (0)
I dont want to knock what you are doing... but why not use a turbocharger?
contraption22 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2005, 07:12 PM   #3
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Gresham, Oregon

My Ride: '89 plymouth voyager
Engine: 2.2 TII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 16.800

Posts: 1,787
Feedback: (1)
sounds awesome, make sure you take pictures. How much did you pay for the M90?
tkelly27 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2005, 08:53 PM   #4
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Holt, Mi

My Ride: 1981 Triumh TR7
Engine: none!
Induct: S/C
1/4: 999.999

Posts: 12
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by contraption22
I dont want to knock what you are doing... but why not use a turbocharger?
Two reasons, it will primarily be an autocross car. Since I am not running SCCA events I can run it at PCA and AROC events in Michigan without having the noses thumbed at me. In a RWD car with a very light rear I would prefer to tune out the snap oversteer from when the boost comes in. The second reason is because the turbo has been done, why not see what a bunch of junkyard parts can do!

Quote:
Originally Posted by tkelly27
How much did you pay for the M90?
I paid $75.00 for a complete wrecked car with title, I sold the engine for $500.00 minus SC I sold the SC to a buddy for HIS GRM project car, he nuked two fresh engines (QUAD4s) before leaving the SC in my garage two years ago! I made about $1100.00 on the car before the SC came back.
quasimofo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2005, 11:27 PM   #5
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Salt Lake & Seattle

My Ride: 92 Duster
Engine: 3.0
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 12.700

Posts: 7,437
Feedback: (0)
Well, unless you are a professional driver, a supercharged car is a lot easier to handle on the track, and is a lot less stressful. Novice drivers really need to worry about the track and not micromanaging the gas pedal.
Ondonti is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2005, 11:37 PM   #6
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Saskatoon, Sask

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,999
Feedback: (0)
you have alot of work ahead of you that's for sure! But it sounds like a *very* unique vehicle.

make sure to post updates!
89daytonaTII is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2005, 04:13 AM   #7
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Fairfax, VA

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,141
Feedback: (0)
i would consider upgrading to a better flowing IC, if youre going 16v especially, that IC will limit your power
QKsilverF1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2005, 05:57 AM   #8
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Holt, Mi

My Ride: 1981 Triumh TR7
Engine: none!
Induct: S/C
1/4: 999.999

Posts: 12
Feedback: (0)
The target is 200 rwhp with the ability to upgrade a lot in the future. For now consistency and repeatability is key.
quasimofo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2005, 07:05 AM   #9
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Fairfax, VA

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,141
Feedback: (0)
then why spend the money and the time to go 16v? 8v will easily produce 200 rwhp. also, if you really want to go 16v i would just put a neon motor in. will be alot cheaper in the long run especially since you already have to fab up mounts etc.
QKsilverF1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2005, 12:53 PM   #10
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Salt Lake & Seattle

My Ride: 92 Duster
Engine: 3.0
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 12.700

Posts: 7,437
Feedback: (0)
I would say, that using a not so great m90.....you might as well just go with a 8v motor. 16 v deserves a much better screw blower.
Ondonti is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2005, 01:34 PM   #11
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: www.TurboDodge.com

My Ride: 1991 Daytona Shelby
Engine: 2.5L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.000

Posts: 2,857
Feedback: (0)
16valve is good. I think m90 is going to work well. It will be potent in a triumph. I would say though that you can do two things. Do an air to water intercooler with the SC intercooler. With autocross, the air cooling for an intercooler isnt as good. With an Air to Water setup, you could use a motorcycle radiator in the front with two small fans to assist. I would also suggest that you go with 4 52lb hr injectors, and then trigger a secondary sprayer for alky injection at the upper boost limits where extra fuel is required. With the hot charge of a SC, espeically in a triumph, the alky will help prevent predetonation. Just my two cents.


Frank
Frank is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2005, 08:06 PM   #12
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Holt, Mi

My Ride: 1981 Triumh TR7
Engine: none!
Induct: S/C
1/4: 999.999

Posts: 12
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank
16valve is good. I think m90 is going to work well. It will be potent in a triumph. I would say though that you can do two things. Do an air to water intercooler with the SC intercooler. With autocross, the air cooling for an intercooler isnt as good. With an Air to Water setup, you could use a motorcycle radiator in the front with two small fans to assist. I would also suggest that you go with 4 52lb hr injectors, and then trigger a secondary sprayer for alky injection at the upper boost limits where extra fuel is required. With the hot charge of a SC, espeically in a triumph, the alky will help prevent predetonation. Just my two cents.


Frank
Shhhhh! You're giving away my surprises!

I intended to build a "cooler" for the TB intercooler and run icewater in it. I had a lot of luck with it in my Merkur and it was plenty easy if you know what to buy (and how to weld) Literally a 30* tank for the intercooler to sit in. The 70lbers are here and paid for, since I have a total budget of $2006.00 I can't make the car perfect but rather I must flex around the pieces I find. We used these same injectors on a 2.0L Alfa Turbo engine and outside of a little loading up on cold idle it worked well.

If I were to run a SOHC head it would be a "normal" car and the last thing you want during this excersize is a normal car. As it stands I am concerned that a RWD supercharged DOHC hybrid will not turn ENOUGH heads in the concourse.

As far as running a "not so great M90" I will only say that any compressor will help make the combination better. Wether screw, helix, turbine, roots, centrifugal as long as you are able to operate within the superchargers CFM range. An M90 is large for a "Normal 2.2L engine", a M62 is better suited for the CFM requirements of one. Add in the 16V head, the bigger injectors, the better (non EPA strangked) fuel map and ignition curve, and the fact it is all but free you must agree it is the perfect blower for MY application.
quasimofo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2005, 08:29 PM   #13
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Salt Lake & Seattle

My Ride: 92 Duster
Engine: 3.0
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 12.700

Posts: 7,437
Feedback: (0)
yes, free does work well. Id be impressed to see you pull off the 16v for so cheap including all the fitment issues.

Im just not a fan of the roots blower efficiencies. I would suggest spraying some alky before the rotors. You will see a decent efficiency increase because it will close up the gaps between blades, and it will actually run a tiny bit higher on boost.
Ondonti is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2005, 08:59 PM   #14
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Holt, Mi

My Ride: 1981 Triumh TR7
Engine: none!
Induct: S/C
1/4: 999.999

Posts: 12
Feedback: (0)
That is one of the neat thing about being me I have worked in the salvage industry for a few years now and I have a pretty decent machine shop at my disposal. I agree with the inefficiencies of the roots blower but it is in no way any different than the inefficiencies of a turbo. Let's face it, using heat to power the intake charge is pretty nuts but it works! Like I said I am using this iteration as a starting point and IF I only pull off a true 200 RWHP I will be happy. We all know that the combination even with the Roots has the capability of laying down a big number in both HP and torque, so if I keep my mindset a little low I can be pleasantly surprised when it gets strapped to the dyno and lays down a 3 instaed of a 2!

Besides it's not like 200hp in a 1900lb car sucks! Oh man a 1900 lb 300 hp car would be cool and the more power the cooler the car becomes!
quasimofo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2005, 09:11 PM   #15
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Salt Lake & Seattle

My Ride: 92 Duster
Engine: 3.0
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 12.700

Posts: 7,437
Feedback: (0)
I still suggest spraying some alky before the rotors. an m90 is something like 50% efficient at best????
Ondonti is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

» Quick Nav
- Home
- Classifieds
- Timeslips
- Gallery
- Vendors
-- Directory
- Tech Articles
- Donate
Sponsors
remove ads

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1
Online Advertising | Free Ringtones | Personal Loans | Cheap Magazines | Website Design


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:03 PM.

Page generated in 0.63549 seconds with 13 queries