TurboDodge.com MarketPlace Shelby Registry Contact Us

Advertisement - Remove these ads today by clicking here.
 

Go Back   TurboDodge.Com - Turbo Dodge forum for Turbo Mopars, Shelbys, Daytona, SRT-4, PT Cruiser, Omni and more! > Turbo specific > Supercharged 2.2 / 2.5s

Supercharged 2.2 / 2.5s Discussion of performance and maintenance specific to supercharging a 2.2 or 2.5.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools

Old 11-21-2005, 10:09 PM   #1
Generic supercharging question #234512  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada

My Ride: 1983 N/A Rampage
Engine: Dodge 2.2L
Induct: N/A
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 54
Feedback: (0)
So I have a 83 dodge rampage N/A, lookin for some boost.

I have been looking through the past posts and it seems a B&M supercharger or a Eaton M90 should be about the same size and produce the same amount of power that i should be looking for. Ie. 5-8lbs of boost, and a cowl or scoop that isn't rediculously tall. I do believe I will go for the M90 as the B&Ms are getitng rarer and more expensive as time leads on.

So i assume the heads will take a little bit of a beating even with the low boost (compared to turbo i guess). So I assume i should probably find a turbo Daytona or omni/ L-body head.

I'd probably switch to a weber 38/38 to keep it rich and a large oval K&N on top, to help it breath better too.

I don't know how I should go about mounting the Charger, probably behind the engine, and have it run off the crank. I don't know about any of the wiring or routing. Soo if anyone could give me a hand, That'd be great
Sirus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2005, 11:09 AM   #2
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Wakefield, Rhode Island

My Ride: 1994 Caravan turbo!
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 3,492
Feedback: (0)
Images: 4
An Eaton M-90 is MUCH larger than the B&M. Remember, they're usually made for 3.8L engines (Thunderbird, Pontiac GTP). I'm using one on my 3.0 supercharger project, and I think it's a little overkill.
big_P is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2005, 06:03 PM   #3
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
86turbozcs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: new york

My Ride: 86 daytona turbo z
Engine: 2.2 turbo
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 266
Feedback: (0)
yeah use the m-90 and the head really shouldnt matter i wouldnt think. the only difference would be the exhaust valves which i guess may be a good thing for the heat. maybe you could use a 287 turbo head if you wanted. better flow in the 287.
86turbozcs is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2005, 06:43 PM   #4
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada

My Ride: 1983 N/A Rampage
Engine: Dodge 2.2L
Induct: N/A
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 54
Feedback: (0)
If a M90 is a over kill, would a M62 suffice? Or could you recemend another kind? Maybe one out of a Toyota M2....
Sirus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

» Quick Nav
- Home
- Classifieds
- Timeslips
- Gallery
- Vendors
-- Directory
- Tech Articles
- Donate
Sponsors
remove ads

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1
Internet Advertising | Vegas Hotel | Loans | Loan | Myspace Layouts


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:34 AM.

Page generated in 0.25618 seconds with 13 queries