 |
|
  |
 |
01-31-2007, 12:22 AM
|
#94
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Gresham, Oregon
My Ride: '89 plymouth voyager
Engine: 2.2 TII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 16.800
|
We'd need more information. I've got an eaton M90 that I could hook up to use the stock manifolds along with a T3 turbo if I so chose. It would be ugly and hard, but it could be done. Do you all really hate spool up that much that you are entertaining this idea? Or do you just wanna be unique? My opinion on the subject, turbo into supercharger supercharger into IC, IC into throttle body. Less chance for leaks, no worries about pressure equalization, etc.
If you kept the stock manifolds, you'd wanna put the SC where the AC normally goes. There really is no other place for it at that point. You're really not going to be getting ultimate HP outta something like this, so ported stock manifolds will probably work fine. Stock manifolds being blow through. Log sux teh bawlz.
This might be a cool project if you just happened to have a M60 and a diesel truck turbo laying around, but otherwise you'll probably be a lot happier playing with wheels and housings on a built turbo setup to see how low you could get the spool up. Boost at 3.5k isn't as bad as it sounds 
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
01-31-2007, 09:50 AM
|
#95
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Lewistown, PA
1/4: 0.000
|
 Quote:
|
Originally Posted by tkelly27
It would be ugly and hard, but it could be done. Do you all really hate spool up that much that you are entertaining this idea?
|
  |
 Hard? Yes. Ugly? Depends on how much effort you put into the thought process. Why not entertain the idea?
 Quote:
|
Originally Posted by tkelly27
...you'd wanna put the SC where the AC normally goes. There really is no other place for it at that point. You're really not going to be getting ultimate HP outta something like this...
|
  |
Supercharger location has already been brought up earlier in the thread. Have you ever pulled off this setup? From what I've seen, no one in the whole TD community has tried it. So what makes ya think some good HP numbers can't be achieved from this setup?
 Quote:
|
Originally Posted by tkelly27
Boost at 3.5k isn't as bad as it sounds 
|
  |
Yet can also be a little bit of a pain on your track times. These cars don't have a high rev limit. Granted, a twincharged setup would need a lot of valve and head work to expand that range. Put together an efficient twincharged setup and it will be one badass ride.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
02-01-2007, 04:29 PM
|
#97
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Gresham, Oregon
My Ride: '89 plymouth voyager
Engine: 2.2 TII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 16.800
|
 Quote:
|
Originally Posted by yarcli52
: So what makes ya think some good HP numbers can't be achieved from this setup?
|
  |
If it was advantageous, from a HP sense, race cars would use it. I'm not saying don't try it. You might be able to get decent numbers, but you'd also get 50-150hp+ more power by not having the SC in there in the first place. Pick your poisen I guess.
It would be pretty sweet, but the FWD cars can't handle the low end they've already got. From what I've heard, 500hp TD's will blow their tires away at 60mph if you tip into them to hard, and you want that torque rise to come sooner at the expense of power on the top end?
Haha, I've got an M90 kicking around, maybe I'll just go ahead and make one to see what it's like (on a V8 of course!).
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
02-16-2008, 07:51 PM
|
#98
|
  |
|
Re: supercharged turbo
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: MA
My Ride: 89 MR2/93 GrandChero
Engine: 1.6 20v / 5.2 V8
Induct: N/A
1/4: 15.100
|
There are several "twin-charged" Toyota MR2 first gens out there. Some of them came supercharged and HKS made a turbo kit for them!
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
02-16-2008, 11:49 PM
|
#99
|
  |
|
Re: supercharged turbo
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bridgeport Wv
My Ride: 84 Rampage
Engine: 2.5
Induct: Turbo + Nitrous
1/4: 0.000
|
A detroit diesel had been supercharged and turboed for years and they are 2 stokes.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
05-11-2008, 12:28 PM
|
#101
|
  |
|
Re: supercharged turbo
|
|
Boostaholic
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Spokane WA
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
I get the responses email on older threads I am in. Then I go back to see what the last thing I said was, or more. Some times I give the same answer over again if I don't look lol.
This is a long drug out compound boost thread, And you can make a lot more power than you can use on the street with FWD, 1 turbo and an 8v engine. But for fun.... 
__________________
Rob Walsh
84 DC Shelby Rampage
86 GLHS 76
87 GLHS 306
89 CSX 187
89 turbo mini
70 R/T SE Challenger
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
05-20-2008, 08:25 PM
|
#104
|
  |
|
Re: supercharged turbo
|
|
Boostaholic
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Spokane WA
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
99% are worthless, there is one that is electric that works, it is a roots blower with an electric motor. but the swirl cage fans do nothing
__________________
Rob Walsh
84 DC Shelby Rampage
86 GLHS 76
87 GLHS 306
89 CSX 187
89 turbo mini
70 R/T SE Challenger
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Quick Nav |
|
» Quick Tech |
|
|