 |
|
  |
 |
05-08-2006, 11:47 AM
|
#31
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Salt Lake & Seattle
My Ride: 92 Duster
Engine: 3.0
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.000
|
I dont know if some people here realise that the only reason those supercharged + turbo rally cars were built was because the technology for antilag and the turbo materials they were using would not last very long. That was 20 years ago.
It was a bandaid that is not useful anymore now that turbines can take higher EGT's (aka antilag tricks dont blow your nice turbo).
The supercharger was simply a means of antilag in order to save money on turbo's that were always blowing up, and to avoid losing races from the turbos failing in a leg of the rally. Current Rally cars have no use for antilag or superchargers now that they have all sorts of engine and turbo restrictions and they have been turned into low rpm torque monsters. The supercharger combination setups was just a smart idea to have a more realiable car in the days of the HP wars for rally cars.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
05-08-2006, 11:48 PM
|
#33
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Fort Covington
My Ride: 93 LeBaron sedan
Engine: 3.0
Induct: N/A
1/4: 0.000
|
so does anyone know of a source for a cheap gm m90 rebuild kit?
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
05-09-2006, 01:13 AM
|
#34
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Salt Lake & Seattle
My Ride: 92 Duster
Engine: 3.0
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.000
|
 Quote:
|
Originally Posted by frostburner
yes some of us people do, ive just been working with superchargers every day for over a year doing designing plenums, complete systems and various other things, and since ive always been a turbo guy and superchargers have grown on me lately i wanna just put them together for the CHALLENGE, its a fun project for me that will only make me better at designing and problem solving, maybe you dont get that. sure i can do the same setup as most td guys but i just want to do somethng different so i have something unique.
|
  |
people were using arguments that included "performance benefits" of which in this day and age (20 years after anyone has played with this idea in real racing). there are no benefits.
Your argument for doing something fun or exciting has nothing to do with my argument against those who think a supercharger + turbo = horsepower magic.
What you are saying is of course, completely valid and I never said a word regarding your reasons. Maybe you dont get that. 
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
05-09-2006, 09:40 AM
|
#36
|
  |
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Edmonton Alberta unfortunately
My Ride: (2) 89 turbo caravan
Engine: turbo 2.5L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
Does anyone have a clue as to the horsepower you'd expect out of a M90 blower on these particular motors?
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
05-09-2006, 03:54 PM
|
#40
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Salt Lake & Seattle
My Ride: 92 Duster
Engine: 3.0
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.000
|
I think if you inject Meth/Eth directly into the blower you can make some insane power and get away with huge amounts of boost that would kill a non alky injected blower setup.
I would enjoy building one myself if I had a RWD car :P
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
05-09-2006, 05:32 PM
|
#42
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Edmonton Alberta unfortunately
My Ride: (2) 89 turbo caravan
Engine: turbo 2.5L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
How much will a stock turbo 2.5 block handle before it has catastrophic failure? Will it handle 300 ponies?
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
05-09-2006, 06:49 PM
|
#43
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Edmonton Alberta unfortunately
My Ride: (2) 89 turbo caravan
Engine: turbo 2.5L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
thanx frostburner I'll gladly accept any help throughout this project or should I say "headache". 
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
05-09-2006, 09:04 PM
|
#45
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Edmonton Alberta unfortunately
My Ride: (2) 89 turbo caravan
Engine: turbo 2.5L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
You'd think it wouldnt matter about the RPM's since it is a 4 banger not a big block. I agree theres going to be HP loss in the higher RPM's but do you think that the larger CFM this blower produces may compensate for this. I've seen a Civic with a 1.6L engine with a M62 supercharger on it and it runs 11.62 in the 1/4. If you follow the Grassroots Motorsports Challenge a couple years back Mongrel motorsports ran a M90 on a BMW 2002 and I believe it was a 2.0L. You'd think with the volume of air the blower pushes out you'd get some serious ass ponies with it. 
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Quick Nav |
|
» Quick Tech |
|
» Market Place |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|