TurboDodge.com MarketPlace Shelby Registry Contact Us

Advertisement - Remove these ads today by clicking here.
 

Go Back   TurboDodge.Com - Turbo Dodge forum for Turbo Mopars, Shelbys, Daytona, SRT-4, PT Cruiser, Omni and more! > Turbo specific > RWD Turbo-Dodge

RWD Turbo-Dodge 2.2 / 2.5 / 3.0 RWD Turbo Conversations.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools

Old 01-02-2007, 04:37 PM   #1
What to look for?  
Boostaholic
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: PA

My Ride: 89Daytona/99Mustang
Engine: 2.2L Turbo II/3.8 V6
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 557
Feedback: (2)
Once my truck is back together and on the road (sometime at the end of this year hopefully) Im planning on selling it for a conquest. What should a look for? Year/submodel ect?
scorpion1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2007, 07:57 PM   #2
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: DELAWARE

My Ride: 84 Rampage
Engine: 2.2 T2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 24
Feedback: (0)
I have read that the 88 and 89 years have stronger rear ends among other improvements. I just bought mine a few months ago so I am still learning. Seems a lot of them have rust issues in the frame rails including mine. Here's a good web site to check out:

http://www.starquestclub.com/forums/index.php

Bob
METZ is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

» Quick Nav
- Home
- Classifieds
- Timeslips
- Gallery
- Vendors
-- Directory
- Tech Articles
- Donate
Sponsors
remove ads

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1
Loans | Stag Weekends | Car Loan | Adverse Credit Remortgage | Fast Loans


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:47 AM.

Page generated in 0.26235 seconds with 13 queries