TurboDodge.com MarketPlace Shelby Registry Contact Us

Advertisement - Remove these ads today by clicking here.
 

Go Back   TurboDodge.Com - Turbo Dodge forum for Turbo Mopars, Shelbys, Daytona, SRT-4, PT Cruiser, Omni and more! > Turbo specific > RWD Turbo-Dodge

RWD Turbo-Dodge 2.2 / 2.5 / 3.0 RWD Turbo Conversations.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools

Old 04-18-2007, 03:04 PM   #16
 
Resident piston cracker
 
crazymadbastard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: CT

My Ride: 92gtc vert
Engine: 2.5 8v
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 22.000

Posts: 3,943
Feedback: (20)
If you really want something different and light look into a 2.4 turbo swap. That would really piss people off too! Not me though, I'm all for uncanny rides.
__________________
" Raise boost till you blow the head gasket(or crack pistons), then back off slightly."

I practice what I preach:
http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q...a/DSC00555.jpg

1992 GTC convertible 2.5/568 aluminum fw/Tu 6puck feramic/s60/3in Tu sv/+40S/ FWD CAL /FMIC/PSSSSTSSSS

end of summer DYNO day coming!!!
crazymadbastard is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2007, 09:16 AM   #17
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Beaver Bank, NS, Canada.

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,032
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by crazymadbastard
If you really want something different and light look into a 2.4 turbo swap. That would really piss people off too! Not me though, I'm all for uncanny rides.
2.4 turbo... Now *that* would be different. Hmmmm....
william is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2007, 11:43 AM   #18
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Iowa

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 57
Feedback: (0)
Go with the 3.9 then. Bigger bore will help get that sled up and spool the turbo better too. Don't wanna mess with 10:1 comp. I've heard on the buick board tuning high compression with boost is a nightmare. Ok I'll stop talking about them . Can't help it, I took it out last night, new chip, fixed the scoop, runs like crap and still buries the speedo before I feel comfortable taking my eyes off the road, sweet!
usetaboost is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2007, 06:41 PM   #19
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Columbus, OH

My Ride: 93 Duster
Engine: 3.0 V6 6G72
Induct: S/C
1/4: 14.620

Posts: 999
Feedback: (0)
I like the 3.9 idea, but I'll throw out another one for you. How about a turbo Slant Six? It weighs about the same as the 3.9, you can get the same power levels from it, and aftermarket/performance parts are easy to find. Plus the engine bay was designed to accept that motor to begin with, hence mounts and the K-frame won't be an issue. The only real drawback that I can see are that the weight isn't as far back, but that's offset a little by the extra room that'll allow you to place everything exactly where you want it. And I can't recall that the /6 ever got EFI, I think they continued the carb up until 89.
Reliability is NOT going to be an issue with the /6, and the long-stroke design of the motor will play into your plans for an autocross car.
Avenger is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2007, 11:24 AM   #20
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Iowa

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 57
Feedback: (0)
I have a hot rod magazine from a few years back that a guy built up a six in Dart, I think. I'll try to find it over the weekend. I know that there's a company that makes turbo kits for CHevy 6s, they might make them for dodge too. If I come across it I'll post that too.
usetaboost is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2007, 12:31 AM   #21
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Gresham, Oregon

My Ride: '89 plymouth voyager
Engine: 2.2 TII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 16.800

Posts: 1,786
Feedback: (1)
Turbo V6 will look cool, especially if you go with DIS. Old guys will think you've chopped off the distributor along with the last 2 cylinders

If it accepts all the parts from the LA small block dodge, the crank and block would be the only thing holding you back from making all the power in the world, and I have no idea what those can handle. I imagine 400hp would be fully possible.

The only benefit to sequential turbo is that it's unique and might spool up quicker. Best bet, big single.

Did they ever come hooked up to an AOD or a 5/6 speed? That'd be super cool for cruzing too
tkelly27 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2007, 12:26 PM   #22
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Beaver Bank, NS, Canada.

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,032
Feedback: (0)
I thought about a /6, but that one has been done lots (relatively). The V6 is already setup for MPFI too. The V6 also shares the LA rear engine bolt pattern. There was an AOD trans available behind the 3.9, as well as a 5 spd, but the 5spd was a truck trans, and I am not sure how the ratios would work on the street. Worth looking into though. The 3.5 would be really wild, but the slugs alone to lower the CR would cost more than a stack of 3.9 engines. I guess the 3.9 is the best place to start, and if it works well, time to look at the 3.5 a little more closely.
william is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2007, 12:51 AM   #23
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Near Harrisburg, PA

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 204
Feedback: (0)
From what I know of the 3.5....they're a great motor Naturally Aspirated. They DON'T hold up to boost well at all. I seem to recall reading something on ALLPAR about this as well.

The 3.9 would be the most sensible conversion, though quite frankly, I think it's more effort than it's worth. More power to ya if ya pull it off though.

Also the 5spd trans behind the 3.9 is not all that strong....however several of the OD automatics will work just fine.
440trk is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2007, 08:30 AM   #24
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Southwest PA

My Ride: 1993 Dodge Shadow ES
Engine: 3.0 V6
Induct: N/A
1/4: 15.680

Posts: 2,599
Feedback: (0)
I used to do a lot of /6 performance stuff, but quit several years ago. It's a solid, reliable, and strong motor design, but the head and intake/exhaust ports SUCK big time. If someone ever custom made a 24 valve DOHC head to fit a Slant it could make some big power.
Tim_K is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2007, 07:51 AM   #25
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Belmont, NC

My Ride: '90 dodge caravan
Engine: 2.5L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 254
Feedback: (0)
that'd be a beautiful engine to see. I read an article on some /6 website about how to fuel inject one for ~$400. The guy used the fuel injection system off a 3.8L buick from 1985. (because it had a mass air flow system instead of map sensor and would compensate for the /6 bein only 3.7L) My favorite line of the entire article was:
"Your slant six came out in 1958 and technology has advanced quite a lot since then. And remember, fuel injecting your slant six is the first step to turbocharging it."
I love dodge guys. You're all insane.
genghis05 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

» Quick Nav
- Home
- Classifieds
- Timeslips
- Gallery
- Vendors
-- Directory
- Tech Articles
- Donate
Sponsors
remove ads

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1
0 Credit Cards | Mortgage insurance | Mortgage | Credit Card | Compare


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:29 PM.

Page generated in 0.91292 seconds with 13 queries