 |
|
  |
 |
04-18-2007, 03:04 PM
|
#16
|
  |
|
|
|
Resident piston cracker
Join Date: May 2003
Location: CT
My Ride: 92gtc vert
Engine: 2.5 8v
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 22.000
|
If you really want something different and light look into a 2.4 turbo swap. That would really piss people off too! Not me though, I'm all for uncanny rides.

__________________
" Raise boost till you blow the head gasket(or crack pistons), then back off slightly."
I practice what I preach:
http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q...a/DSC00555.jpg
1992 GTC convertible 2.5/568 aluminum fw/Tu 6puck feramic/s60/3in Tu sv/+40S/ FWD CAL /FMIC/PSSSSTSSSS
end of summer DYNO day coming!!!
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
05-04-2007, 06:41 PM
|
#19
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Columbus, OH
My Ride: 93 Duster
Engine: 3.0 V6 6G72
Induct: S/C
1/4: 14.620
|
I like the 3.9 idea, but I'll throw out another one for you. How about a turbo Slant Six? It weighs about the same as the 3.9, you can get the same power levels from it, and aftermarket/performance parts are easy to find. Plus the engine bay was designed to accept that motor to begin with, hence mounts and the K-frame won't be an issue. The only real drawback that I can see are that the weight isn't as far back, but that's offset a little by the extra room that'll allow you to place everything exactly where you want it. And I can't recall that the /6 ever got EFI, I think they continued the carb up until 89.
Reliability is NOT going to be an issue with the /6, and the long-stroke design of the motor will play into your plans for an autocross car.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
05-07-2007, 12:31 AM
|
#21
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Gresham, Oregon
My Ride: '89 plymouth voyager
Engine: 2.2 TII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 16.800
|
Turbo V6 will look cool, especially if you go with DIS. Old guys will think you've chopped off the distributor along with the last 2 cylinders
If it accepts all the parts from the LA small block dodge, the crank and block would be the only thing holding you back from making all the power in the world, and I have no idea what those can handle. I imagine 400hp would be fully possible.
The only benefit to sequential turbo is that it's unique and might spool up quicker. Best bet, big single.
Did they ever come hooked up to an AOD or a 5/6 speed? That'd be super cool for cruzing too 
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
05-07-2007, 12:26 PM
|
#22
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Beaver Bank, NS, Canada.
1/4: 0.000
|
I thought about a /6, but that one has been done lots (relatively). The V6 is already setup for MPFI too. The V6 also shares the LA rear engine bolt pattern. There was an AOD trans available behind the 3.9, as well as a 5 spd, but the 5spd was a truck trans, and I am not sure how the ratios would work on the street. Worth looking into though. The 3.5 would be really wild, but the slugs alone to lower the CR would cost more than a stack of 3.9 engines. I guess the 3.9 is the best place to start, and if it works well, time to look at the 3.5 a little more closely.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
08-19-2007, 08:30 AM
|
#24
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Southwest PA
My Ride: 1993 Dodge Shadow ES
Engine: 3.0 V6
Induct: N/A
1/4: 15.680
|
I used to do a lot of /6 performance stuff, but quit several years ago. It's a solid, reliable, and strong motor design, but the head and intake/exhaust ports SUCK big time. If someone ever custom made a 24 valve DOHC head to fit a Slant it could make some big power.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
08-20-2007, 07:51 AM
|
#25
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Belmont, NC
My Ride: '90 dodge caravan
Engine: 2.5L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
that'd be a beautiful engine to see. I read an article on some /6 website about how to fuel inject one for ~$400. The guy used the fuel injection system off a 3.8L buick from 1985. (because it had a mass air flow system instead of map sensor and would compensate for the /6 bein only 3.7L) My favorite line of the entire article was:
"Your slant six came out in 1958 and technology has advanced quite a lot since then. And remember, fuel injecting your slant six is the first step to turbocharging it."
I love dodge guys. You're all insane.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Quick Nav |
|
» Quick Tech |
|
» Market Place |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|