TurboDodge.com MarketPlace Shelby Registry Contact Us

Advertisement - Remove these ads today by clicking here.
 

Go Back   TurboDodge.Com - Turbo Dodge forum for Turbo Mopars, Shelbys, Daytona, SRT-4, PT Cruiser, Omni and more! > Turbo specific > 3.0 Turbo

3.0 Turbo Turbocharged 3.0 V6 Conversations

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools

Old 11-21-2006, 08:20 PM   #526
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Las Vegas

My Ride: 94 Dodge Caravan
Engine: 3.0L V6
Induct: N/A
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,843
Feedback: (0)
no kidding. That;s why it's not adding up, somehow
mwinkle353 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2006, 08:29 PM   #527
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Abbotsford, BC, Canada

My Ride: 1989 Turbo Caravan
Engine: 2.5L 8V Sohc
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.400

Posts: 14,727
Feedback: (2)
Unless my thinking is wrong, your shim is too thick. You should have added .067" or less. I realize about ratio but my thinking is in this case, it won't matter.
turbovanman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2006, 08:46 PM   #528
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Salt Lake & Seattle

My Ride: 92 Duster
Engine: 3.0
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 12.700

Posts: 7,571
Feedback: (0)
cam pushes up on the Rocker which pivots on a tube, then pushes down on the valve/lifter
Cross flow heads......
look

Last edited by Ondonti; 11-21-2006 at 08:54 PM.
Ondonti is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2006, 02:22 AM   #529
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Abbotsford, BC, Canada

My Ride: 1989 Turbo Caravan
Engine: 2.5L 8V Sohc
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.400

Posts: 14,727
Feedback: (2)
I know how it works, I work on them all the time. Based on I just did a regrind on a Honda with adjustable rocker arms, I would say .100 is too much unless you got really wild cams. But I could also be wrong, just throwing out idea's. I have never measured etc to figure this stuff out soooooo! And if your valves worked before and since you added the shim they don't, that could be it.

Also you say no oil pressure, it could be that as the lifters won't harden and of course, the valves won't open.
turbovanman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2006, 04:26 AM   #530
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Salt Lake & Seattle

My Ride: 92 Duster
Engine: 3.0
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 12.700

Posts: 7,571
Feedback: (0)
stock cam is .350" lift
These are .450" lift
Stock duration 182
Mine 278

removed .067" material from cam
Ondonti is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2006, 06:22 PM   #531
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Southwest PA

My Ride: '89 2.5 Turbo Spirit
Engine: 2.5 Turbo
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 14.920

Posts: 2,611
Feedback: (0)
Have you put a compression gauge on any of the cylinders and got a reading, or does it just sound like there's no compression?

Is there any free play at all in the rockers with the cam lobe on the base circle and the lifters not pumped up? I'd think you could move the rocker a bit by hand if the lifter had no pressure on it and the cam wasn't lifting at that point in its rotation, and the lifters weren't shimmed to the point of being solid against the valvetrain.

The shim thickness math sounds right, but I still think a thinner shim is needed.

I'm sure you've checked the timing mark alignments already, so I won't mention that.
Tim_K is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2006, 12:07 AM   #532
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Salt Lake & Seattle

My Ride: 92 Duster
Engine: 3.0
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 12.700

Posts: 7,571
Feedback: (0)
Hav'nt checked the cam timing as Im not wanting to work on the car.

I did do a compression check, zero compression. I did the compression check because it sounded like "no compression"

I was looking for the "boat motor glugging in the water when trying to start up" and all I heard was the starter. I never actually got oil pressure.
Ondonti is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2006, 12:11 AM   #533
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Salt Lake & Seattle

My Ride: 92 Duster
Engine: 3.0
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 12.700

Posts: 7,571
Feedback: (0)
i guess I could pull the front valve cover on the spirit and see how those rockers "feel" when I push/pull on them compared to the duster.
Ondonti is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2006, 08:16 AM   #534
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: quakertown pa

My Ride: 1993 dodge daytona
Engine: 3.0
Induct: S/C
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 574
Feedback: (0)
0 compression doesnt sound right. the cams have to be shimmed wrong. what has changed since the motor ran last time compared to now?

is your motor no longer a "tolerance" motor w/ the new cams? if you spun the crank w/ the timing belt off and the cams in the head you could have bent the valves.
m90daytona is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2006, 06:28 PM   #535
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Salt Lake & Seattle

My Ride: 92 Duster
Engine: 3.0
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 12.700

Posts: 7,571
Feedback: (0)
and that would not cause Zero compression.
Ondonti is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2006, 07:40 PM   #536
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: quakertown pa

My Ride: 1993 dodge daytona
Engine: 3.0
Induct: S/C
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 574
Feedback: (0)
yeah i just cant think of anything else besides the shims. in this case all shims would have to be wrong. they would almost have to be open at all times to have zero.
m90daytona is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2006, 02:27 AM   #537
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Salt Lake & Seattle

My Ride: 92 Duster
Engine: 3.0
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 12.700

Posts: 7,571
Feedback: (0)
Okay well this is sorta lame as far as funny things go.

I checked the cam timing and it was correct.

I pulled the rockers again, this is probably the 10th time AT LEAST.

I measured the difference of the cam base circles with feeler gauges (not really accurate so i tried different places).

Anyways I came up with .067" material removed which happens to be the exact calculation (probably coincidence since depending on where you put the feeler gauge you get different measurements) I made when calculating how much material was removed based on the lift increase.


So Im stuck with what to do since it would seem I need .100" shim for .067" material removed from cam.
Ondonti is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2006, 03:51 AM   #538
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Salt Lake & Seattle

My Ride: 92 Duster
Engine: 3.0
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 12.700

Posts: 7,571
Feedback: (0)
im gonna try 2 washers which is .066" shim.

3 washers was actually measuring about .105" shim when installed (2 small washers 1 bigger).
Ondonti is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2006, 05:35 AM   #539
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Salt Lake & Seattle

My Ride: 92 Duster
Engine: 3.0
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 12.700

Posts: 7,571
Feedback: (0)
Put the rockers back in with the new smaller shim.
27 degrees outside ick :P I torqued the rockers down then quit. Not sure why i like to work at night. Doesnt go so great in the winter.
Ondonti is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2006, 07:29 AM   #540
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Salt Lake & Seattle

My Ride: 92 Duster
Engine: 3.0
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 12.700

Posts: 7,571
Feedback: (0)
Well im just remembering now that my valves are longer then stock so that is probably why my lifters are being funny.
I had thought of this before months ago but I forgot.
Picture is crooked but you can see the difference.

If I was intelligent I could probably measure the difference on the picture then propotionally adjust for the valve being smaller in the picture


I tried blowing the picture up real big and it was about .040-.050" difference assuming the valve seat is the same distance from the bottom of the valve.
I may have to go back to 1 shim......Im not sure now.......Looks like the ferrea valve actually has its valve seal closer to the bottom of the valve so that would make the difference in length even greater.

My machinist knew I was using a reground cam and he knew what the difference was so IM assuming he did some of this on purpose.

Im guessing that I wouldnt get .450" lift either without the longer valve. I didnt really think of that before.
I basically just asked him "can I get .450" lift" and after he played with it for a week he said "yes"

Seems that He sorta cheated to get more lift out of the head.
Feel free to look at the pic and see what you think........it almost seems to me there might be a .070" or so difference and that would mean I should only use 1 shim (.030")

Last edited by Ondonti; 11-25-2006 at 07:47 AM.
Ondonti is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

» Quick Nav
- Home
- Classifieds
- Timeslips
- Gallery
- Vendors
-- Directory
- Tech Articles
- Donate
Sponsors
remove ads

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1
Loans | Gas Suppliers | Bob Carr Performing Arts Centre | Western Union Money Transfer | Loans


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:55 AM.

Page generated in 0.53572 seconds with 13 queries