TurboDodge.com MarketPlace Shelby Registry Contact Us

Advertisement - Remove these ads today by clicking here.
 

Go Back   TurboDodge.Com - Turbo Dodge forum for Turbo Mopars, Shelbys, Daytona, SRT-4, PT Cruiser, Omni and more! > Turbo specific > 3.0 Turbo

3.0 Turbo Turbocharged 3.0 V6 Conversations

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools

Old 07-06-2006, 04:23 PM   #1
Ok, bore question  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Port Richey FL

My Ride: 94 Plymouth Duster
Engine: 6g72 181c.i.d.
Induct: N/A
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,099
Feedback: (0)
What is the maximum bore feasible on the 3.0? I've heard .100 over. That was my original goal. Will it hurt the integrity of the block at all? I'm going w/ free floater JE or Venolia's and my machinist is very concerned that .100 over might be too much. Having never done something like this before, I don't know just how extreme .100 over is. I have heard of a few guys doing it, I just want to know if will hold what I want it to. He also estimates a displacement increase of .2-.3 liters which will be very cool. The rods will be shot peened and re-sized, the crank is getting blue-printed, and like I said-free floating pistons. He says it's good for RPMs and whatnot. He hasn't bored anything yet, and says it is going to be very difficult to get these pistons in this style. I tried asking brent, but he never got back to me. How the hell did he score such a good deal?! Who did he talk to, and can I get the same deal?
DustyR/T is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2006, 04:35 PM   #2
 
Boostaholic
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Indiana

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 898
Feedback: (0)
Take your block into your machine shop and have them tell you how far they can bore it... It will vary some from block to block.

You may have to have a headgasket made up for your application...
__________________
Edward Kelly
Kelly-Mulhern Performance
www.kmperformance.com
c2xejk is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2006, 08:59 PM   #3
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Port Richey FL

My Ride: 94 Plymouth Duster
Engine: 6g72 181c.i.d.
Induct: N/A
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,099
Feedback: (0)
already did. He is just curious because he has never worked this much out of a 3.0 Mitsu/chrysler.
DustyR/T is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2006, 08:57 AM   #4
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: St Louis, Missouri

My Ride: 89 Shelby Daytona
Engine: 2.2L T2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 603
Feedback: (1)
are you planning on running boost or NOS? If so I'd keep it as tight as possible so you keep your cyl strenght up. I don't think I've heard of anyone going more than .060 over tho.
Harvii is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2006, 10:03 AM   #5
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Las Vegas

My Ride: 94 Dodge Caravan
Engine: 3.0L V6
Induct: N/A
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,830
Feedback: (0)
Brent went 0.096" over with his forged pistons. So, it is possible. As for cylinder wall strength; I'd say, "stay tuned for what's in store after he starts running boost through that monster of a motor."


Is it possible: Yes
Will it hold the pressure: Dunno yet
mwinkle353 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2006, 10:21 AM   #6
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Salt Lake & Seattle

My Ride: 92 Duster
Engine: 3.0
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 12.700

Posts: 7,424
Feedback: (0)
okay I dont know what you guys are getting at.


dohc 6g72 guys bore .100" or bigger and last time I checked the same guys make 500+WHP and I believe Ray Pampena who makes 1200+crank HP has a .120" overbore.

If you think you could possibly make too much power for a large overbore you are dreaming.

.100" overbore leaves .200" wall thickness which is enough for 700whp in a Non girdled low quality cast iron block.

Our block is much stronger inately then one of those low quality blocks.

many new engines come from the factory with stock wall thicknesses of .090" which in a 3.0L engine is still good for 300whp. 99.99% of 3.0 owners make less then 300whp. You could theoretically overbore .200" then if you didnt have any core shift. .
Ondonti is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2006, 10:24 AM   #7
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Salt Lake & Seattle

My Ride: 92 Duster
Engine: 3.0
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 12.700

Posts: 7,424
Feedback: (0)
Since a lot of motors have stock wall thicknesses of .090-.150" overboring .100" would just not work. We have .300" wall thickness.
Ondonti is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2006, 01:17 PM   #8
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Mansfield, OH

My Ride: Daytona
Engine: 3.0l 181
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 693
Feedback: (0)
i bored mine to .08 if that helps... lol
Chief8one is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2006, 01:25 PM   #9
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Salt Lake & Seattle

My Ride: 92 Duster
Engine: 3.0
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 12.700

Posts: 7,424
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chief8one
i bored mine to .08 if that helps... lol
You went against the BS law of never boring past .060"..........your motor will self destruct with only 150whp let alone you having a turbo.

Ondonti is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

» Quick Nav
- Home
- Classifieds
- Timeslips
- Gallery
- Vendors
-- Directory
- Tech Articles
- Donate
Sponsors
remove ads

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1
American Flags | Bad Credit Mortgages | Mobile Phone | Mortgage Calculator | Play Fun Games


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:20 AM.

Page generated in 0.83214 seconds with 13 queries