 |
|
  |
 |
07-17-2006, 06:22 PM
|
#2
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: May 2003
Location: NE OH
My Ride: 1990 Daytona ES
Engine: 3.0L V6
Induct: N/A
1/4: 0.000
|
I've never heard anyone try this, sounds like it would be quite a bit of work.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
07-17-2006, 06:56 PM
|
#3
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: nebraska usa
1/4: 0.000
|
They use the same injectors, a gm tb could work, knock sensor would be easy, coolant temp sensor, easy, map sensor, easy, crank trigger could be made, what am I missing? tps is on tb. I know it would be alot of work if possible with my automatic, but with a stick? Painless wiring makes harnesses for streetrods and older efi swaps. I am just asking has anyone thought of or tried?
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
07-18-2006, 01:01 AM
|
#5
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Salt Lake & Seattle
My Ride: 92 Duster
Engine: 3.0
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 12.700
|
that would make my underdash harness cry!!!!!!!!!!!
It already doesnt behave.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
07-18-2006, 11:51 AM
|
#8
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: London, Ontario
My Ride: 89 Spirit ES 3.0
Engine: NA 3.0
Induct: N/A
1/4: 0.000
|
Why not Megasquirt?
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
07-18-2006, 01:14 PM
|
#9
|
  |
|
The guages would be very easy I think
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Huntsville, Alabama
My Ride: 1992 Daytona R/T
Engine: 2.2 TIII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
* speedometer, just leave it as it is, the SMEC sees the signal from the speed sensor but so does the speedometer, and the speedometer doesn't care
* Water temp, the guage uses a diffeent sensor than the SMEC anyway
* Oil pressure only goes to the dash anyway\
* Tach can be run directly off the coil
* Fuel guage is read directly from the tank sender
What else is there? Unless you have a systems monitor or driving computer, there is absolutely no reason whatsoever that it can't be done.
If you have a '91 or newer with a body control computer, the instruments themselves are still the same anyway, they just get thier signals from the BCC.
 Quote:
|
Originally Posted by moorepowercoati
Aftermarket gauges? The GM stuff is just so tuneable. I know my auto would be a nitemare, but it may be a way for the stick cars to be all they can be.
|
  |
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
07-18-2006, 07:39 PM
|
#12
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Insanity!
1/4: 0.000
|
 Quote:
|
Originally Posted by c2xejk
So what are you trying to gain by going to a different controller???
|
  |
The turbo buick ECM's are VERY hackable.
Kind of unlike what us 3.0 guys have now.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
07-19-2006, 07:47 AM
|
#13
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: London, Ontario
My Ride: 89 Spirit ES 3.0
Engine: NA 3.0
Induct: N/A
1/4: 0.000
|
Going to a GM ECM is fine and all but then you have to mess with some kind of ignition pickup. I think Gm uses some kind of a combination of a hall effect and VR sensor for their DIS systems. I say mount a 36-1 wheel on the back of our crank pulley, mount a ford VR sensor and either run Megasquirt with a Ford EDIS6 box or feed the VR signal right into MS to run the stock coil or run a coilpack of some kind. I like the MS idea better. I hate burning chips though. MS is can be fashed on the fly which makes tuning a breeze. Not to mention it can be setup to run whatever you want and you can build a complete working unit for $300.
Sorry I'm not trying to steal your thread. I just want to throw some ideas out to people
I gues if you're not in to building electronics yourself MS would cost a bunch more to buy completed
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
07-20-2006, 09:36 PM
|
#15
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Southwest PA
My Ride: 1993 Dodge Shadow ES
Engine: 3.0 V6
Induct: N/A
1/4: 15.680
|
I see a lot of GMs at the dragstrip, and their owners talk about how they bought a chip that was flashed for their setup and plugged it in, and that was it.
I hate it that GM makes things easy like that.
Why does Chrysler have to be so tough with letting their calibrations be changed? What do they think they're going to lose in the process?
Can't the signal from the V6 distributor be adapted to the GM computer? I'd hate to give up the simplicity of the distributor.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Quick Nav |
|
» Quick Tech |
|
» Market Place |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|