TurboDodge.com MarketPlace Shelby Registry Contact Us

Advertisement - Remove these ads today by clicking here.
 

Go Back   TurboDodge.Com - Turbo Dodge forum for Turbo Mopars, Shelbys, Daytona, SRT-4, PT Cruiser, Omni and more! > Turbo specific > 3.0 Turbo

3.0 Turbo Turbocharged 3.0 V6 Conversations

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools

Old 09-15-2006, 10:28 AM   #1
Im Rebuilding A 3.0l  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: woodbridge ontario canada

My Ride: 1991 acclaim
Engine: 3.0L
Induct: N/A
1/4: 16.700

Posts: 41
Feedback: (0)
hi im new to this great site

im rebuilding a 3L for my acclaim where would be the best place to get some performance parts : pistons, cam, crank etc.....
acclaim200hp is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2006, 02:16 PM   #2
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan

My Ride: 93 Sundance Duster
Engine: 3.0L V-6
Induct: N/A
1/4: 14.208

Posts: 1,722
Feedback: (0)
Well, do you want to boost it or keep it N/A? If N/A do you want to run stock compression or high compression? You can use mitsu diamante pistons and raise the compression to 10:1. Do want forged internals?
93sundance is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2006, 02:58 PM   #3
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Port Richey FL

My Ride: 94 Plymouth Duster
Engine: 6g72 181c.i.d.
Induct: N/A
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,099
Feedback: (0)
Forged crank and rods are a waste of money unless you're boosting well over 20psi. My pistons cost $800 for .100 overbore from Ross. Ian helped me out a lot. Hell, if I was going high compression, I would do something like 12:1. I like boost because you can keep stock compression/non-interference factor and rev w/o worry as well as have a flexible power table depending on your boost setting. Want more power, turn up the boost. I like that.
DustyR/T is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2006, 03:32 PM   #4
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: woodbridge ontario canada

My Ride: 1991 acclaim
Engine: 3.0L
Induct: N/A
1/4: 16.700

Posts: 41
Feedback: (0)
i will be adding boost supercharging to be exact
acclaim200hp is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2006, 04:30 PM   #5
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Salt Lake & Seattle

My Ride: 92 Duster
Engine: 3.0
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 12.700

Posts: 7,424
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DustyR/T
Forged crank and rods are a waste of money unless you're boosting well over 20psi. My pistons cost $800 for .100 overbore from Ross. Ian helped me out a lot. Hell, if I was going high compression, I would do something like 12:1. I like boost because you can keep stock compression/non-interference factor and rev w/o worry as well as have a flexible power table depending on your boost setting. Want more power, turn up the boost. I like that.
I dont think a sohc can ever make enough power to overcome the cast crank.

The 6g72 only has ONE rod design, forged. There are different part #'s but only one part.
Ondonti is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2006, 04:32 PM   #6
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: woodbridge ontario canada

My Ride: 1991 acclaim
Engine: 3.0L
Induct: N/A
1/4: 16.700

Posts: 41
Feedback: (0)
im not going to crazy with the motor so should i just use NOS internals
acclaim200hp is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2006, 04:34 PM   #7
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Salt Lake & Seattle

My Ride: 92 Duster
Engine: 3.0
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 12.700

Posts: 7,424
Feedback: (0)
listen to 93 sundance. the others are turbo obsessed (this is an incurable sickness).

Last edited by Ondonti : 09-15-2006 at 04:59 PM.
Ondonti is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2006, 05:12 PM   #8
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan

My Ride: 93 Sundance Duster
Engine: 3.0L V-6
Induct: N/A
1/4: 14.208

Posts: 1,722
Feedback: (0)
I'm the N/A man lol. When is someone going to beat my ET N/A??? Hell, I think there are only 2 known ppl with 3.0Ls (N/A OR boosted) that beat my time and have the slips to prove it. Ondonti is one of the 2.
93sundance is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2006, 06:07 PM   #9
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: May 2004

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 282
Feedback: (0)
whats your E/T? just curious.. and no matter what you do to the 3.0... there is one and only one word to use when describing this motor... TORQUE
Jetson8294 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2006, 08:30 PM   #10
 
Boostaholic
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Indiana

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 898
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 93sundance
I'm the N/A man lol. When is someone going to beat my ET N/A??? Hell, I think there are only 2 known ppl with 3.0Ls (N/A OR boosted) that beat my time and have the slips to prove it. Ondonti is one of the 2.
HP is better indicated by the MPH than ET...
__________________
Edward Kelly
Kelly-Mulhern Performance
www.kmperformance.com
c2xejk is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2006, 09:03 PM   #11
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Salt Lake & Seattle

My Ride: 92 Duster
Engine: 3.0
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 12.700

Posts: 7,424
Feedback: (0)
josh has run 96mph
Ondonti is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2006, 09:06 PM   #12
 
Boostaholic
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Indiana

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 898
Feedback: (0)
Your point is?
__________________
Edward Kelly
Kelly-Mulhern Performance
www.kmperformance.com
c2xejk is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2006, 09:09 PM   #13
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Salt Lake & Seattle

My Ride: 92 Duster
Engine: 3.0
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 12.700

Posts: 7,424
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by c2xejk
Your point is?
you were worrying about MPH rather then ET to compare HP
Therefore Im just throwing out #'s
Also his post was TALKING about ET therefore I dont understand why you posted something about MPH when he didnt say anything about power.
Oh, josh, hassler has also run faster then you but he is a cheating turbo user like me.
Ondonti is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2006, 09:13 PM   #14
 
Boostaholic
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Indiana

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 898
Feedback: (0)
Ok, Stein has run a 98MPH with two people in the car. Not mention generally, G-bodies are heavier than P-bodies... And Steins engine is bone stock internals...
__________________
Edward Kelly
Kelly-Mulhern Performance
www.kmperformance.com
c2xejk is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2006, 09:46 PM   #15
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Fort Covington

My Ride: 93 LeBaron sedan
Engine: 3.0
Induct: N/A
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,853
Feedback: (0)
hopefully soon however, i will not have a time slip cause it is at a friends track, must be nice to have a track in your backyard.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 93sundance
I'm the N/A man lol. When is someone going to beat my ET N/A??? Hell, I think there are only 2 known ppl with 3.0Ls (N/A OR boosted) that beat my time and have the slips to prove it. Ondonti is one of the 2.
Boogieman142 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

» Quick Nav
- Home
- Classifieds
- Timeslips
- Gallery
- Vendors
-- Directory
- Tech Articles
- Donate
Sponsors
remove ads

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1
Mortgage Calculator | Broadband | Credit Cards | Web Games | The eBay Song