TurboDodge.com MarketPlace Shelby Registry Contact Us

Advertisement - Remove these ads today by clicking here.
 

Go Back   TurboDodge.Com - Turbo Dodge forum for Turbo Mopars, Shelbys, Daytona, SRT-4, PT Cruiser, Omni and more! > Turbo specific > 3.0 Turbo

3.0 Turbo Turbocharged 3.0 V6 Conversations

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools

Old 09-18-2007, 11:36 AM   #46
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Indiana

My Ride: 95 Caravan SE
Engine: 3.0
Induct: N/A
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 945
Feedback: (0)
My 95 3.0 doesn't have a charge temp sensor at the plenum, and I was wondering why they don't put them in anymore.

Does anyone know, what sensor information is used in it's place, if any? Or does anyone know what sort of changes they made to the SBEC, so they could make such a change in sensor configuration?

My 95 3.0 also has a separate sensor, next to the coolant temp sensor, that tells the fan when to turn on. I think that one is a Lower Intake Temp Sensor, because it doesn't go into the coolant like the coolant temp sensor.

So does the ECU extrapolate, based on those two sensor readings along with 02 sensor readings, to figure out the same sort of info it used to get directly from the Charge Temp Sensor? What advantages or disadvantages does the newer sensor configuration have?
lookin is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2007, 05:57 PM   #47
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Indiana

My Ride: 95 Caravan SE
Engine: 3.0
Induct: N/A
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 945
Feedback: (0)
Would someone please be kind and answer my above question?

Thanks
lookin is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2007, 06:56 PM   #48
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Salt Lake & Seattle

My Ride: 92 Duster
Engine: 3.0
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.000

Posts: 7,190
Feedback: (0)
Im not sure what you mean when you are talking about those two sensors......

There are two coolant temp sensors. Both touch the coolant.

-The big one talks to your ECU and controls the fan etc.

-The small sensor is what runs the coolant temp gauge in your instrument cluster.
Ondonti is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2007, 07:06 PM   #49
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Indiana

My Ride: 95 Caravan SE
Engine: 3.0
Induct: N/A
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 945
Feedback: (0)
Oh. Yeah that's right. I completely spaced that.


What about the charge temp sensor part of my question?
lookin is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2007, 07:14 PM   #50
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Indiana

My Ride: 95 Caravan SE
Engine: 3.0
Induct: N/A
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 945
Feedback: (0)
Thanks very much for cluing me about the coolant temp sensors Ondonti.
lookin is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2007, 08:30 AM   #51
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Port Richey FL

My Ride: 94 Plymouth Duster
Engine: 6g72 181c.i.d.
Induct: N/A
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,091
Feedback: (0)
If equipted, the charge temp sensor just fed the ECM information about density (temperature) of the air which helped adjust air/fuel on one more fine scale. The 3.0's either did or didn't have them. Most did not before 96 because 96 was the year OBD-II arrived along with all the other cooky sensors everyone compains about today to keep vehicles running well.

Quote:
Originally Posted by lookin
My 95 3.0 doesn't have a charge temp sensor at the plenum, and I was wondering why they don't put them in anymore.

Does anyone know, what sensor information is used in it's place, if any? Or does anyone know what sort of changes they made to the SBEC, so they could make such a change in sensor configuration?

My 95 3.0 also has a separate sensor, next to the coolant temp sensor, that tells the fan when to turn on. I think that one is a Lower Intake Temp Sensor, because it doesn't go into the coolant like the coolant temp sensor.

So does the ECU extrapolate, based on those two sensor readings along with 02 sensor readings, to figure out the same sort of info it used to get directly from the Charge Temp Sensor? What advantages or disadvantages does the newer sensor configuration have?
DustyR/T is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2007, 09:27 AM   #52
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Indiana

My Ride: 95 Caravan SE
Engine: 3.0
Induct: N/A
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 945
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DustyR/T
If equipted, the charge temp sensor just fed the ECM information about density (temperature) of the air which helped adjust air/fuel on one more fine scale. The 3.0's either did or didn't have them. Most did not before 96 because 96 was the year OBD-II arrived along with all the other cooky sensors everyone compains about today to keep vehicles running well.
Thanks Dusty. I figured as much. I was wondering if the ECM uses an average of other sensors data, to accomplish the same purpose, when the charge temp sensor was not included?

I was also wondering if the ECU on my 95 3.0 may still have connector pins, for the old charge temp sensor on the harness, and if it would do any good to try and modify the current going to it with a resistor or something?

I gather that the ECU would learn to compensate for that also though. The performance increase I get, from the 'B&M command flow' unit I installed, only lasts about a day. The higher fp makes a real difference for a short time though. I wish I could figure out how to easily get around that. If I now understand this thread though, so do all of you guys, and I am asking about this stuff just to make sure. All of this is obviously still as clear as mud to me.

One more incredibly stupid question:

Is it called the ECU in my 95 3.0 instead of the SBEC? Or is that a whole nother thang or what?

Thanks for your answers Dusty.
lookin is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2007, 07:21 PM   #53
 
Boostaholic
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Indiana

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 869
Feedback: (0)
ECU = Engine Control Unit. It is a generic name for an engine controller.
SBEC = Single Board Engine Controller.
SBEC II = 2nd generation Single Board Engine Controller.
SMEC = Single Module Engine Controller.
PCM = Powertrain Control Module. (Engine and transmission controller)
TCM = Transmission Control Module.
ECM = Engine Control Module.
__________________
Edward Kelly
Kelly-Mulhern Performance
www.kmperformance.com
c2xejk is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2007, 08:43 PM   #54
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Indiana

My Ride: 95 Caravan SE
Engine: 3.0
Induct: N/A
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 945
Feedback: (0)
sigh
lookin is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2007, 12:38 PM   #55
 
Boostaholic
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Indiana

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 869
Feedback: (0)
If you go to a junk yard/parts store and ask for an "SBEC" the guy will likely just stare blankly back at you. If you ask for an "ECM"/"ECU"/"Engine Control Module", the guy most likely start typing.
__________________
Edward Kelly
Kelly-Mulhern Performance
www.kmperformance.com
c2xejk is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2007, 02:41 PM   #56
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Indiana

My Ride: 95 Caravan SE
Engine: 3.0
Induct: N/A
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 945
Feedback: (0)
Ok. Thanks Ed.
lookin is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

» Quick Nav
- Home
- Classifieds
- Timeslips
- Gallery
- Vendors
-- Directory
- Tech Articles
- Donate
Sponsors
remove ads

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1
Mortgage | Plane Tickets | Loans | BabbFest | Sprint Ringtones


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:53 PM.

Page generated in 0.44045 seconds with 13 queries