09-20-2007, 08:30 AM
|
#51
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Port Richey FL
My Ride: 94 Plymouth Duster
Engine: 6g72 181c.i.d.
Induct: N/A
1/4: 0.000
|
If equipted, the charge temp sensor just fed the ECM information about density (temperature) of the air which helped adjust air/fuel on one more fine scale. The 3.0's either did or didn't have them. Most did not before 96 because 96 was the year OBD-II arrived along with all the other cooky sensors everyone compains about today to keep vehicles running well.
 Quote:
|
Originally Posted by lookin
My 95 3.0 doesn't have a charge temp sensor at the plenum, and I was wondering why they don't put them in anymore.
Does anyone know, what sensor information is used in it's place, if any? Or does anyone know what sort of changes they made to the SBEC, so they could make such a change in sensor configuration?
My 95 3.0 also has a separate sensor, next to the coolant temp sensor, that tells the fan when to turn on. I think that one is a Lower Intake Temp Sensor, because it doesn't go into the coolant like the coolant temp sensor.
So does the ECU extrapolate, based on those two sensor readings along with 02 sensor readings, to figure out the same sort of info it used to get directly from the Charge Temp Sensor? What advantages or disadvantages does the newer sensor configuration have?
|
  |
|
|
|