10-25-2007, 11:53 AM
|
#3
|
  |
|
Re: Head work
|
|
Boostaholic
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Indiana
1/4: 0.000
|
Yup, without a flow bench you are shooting blind...
Currently I have the intake port w/stock valve at ~230 CFM. I can get it to 235, but the head would likely be only suitable for a high RPM setup... My goal has been to get the measured velocity to ~250 feet/sec (fps) at .35" lift and ~300 fps at ~.40"+
On the exhaust side what the flow bench can tell you is much more limited. Basically you focus less on the CFM and more trying to get the port exit velocity to 300 fps. Right now with an insert I have it to about 284-294 fps at the .35"-.45" lift. On the heads I am working on now, I plan trying one additional step that kills the flowbench CFM, but is supposed to do wonders for a running engine...
Right now the biggest obsticle to a good exhaust port is casting. I have been toying with going to a +2 or +3mm valve, but for the moment there are some things I want to try with the stock valve...
As for gaining only over .2" lift on the exhaust port, that seems to be pretty much true as soon as you do _anything_ to the SSR. Some rounding of the SSR is "necessary" to get the high-lift flow up enough to get the velocity in the right ball park... Too much rounding can kill the low-lift forward flow _and_ increases the low-lift reverse flow. (ie. increase reversion which kills low-rpm power...) It is a balancing act...
One final note, on the intake port, increasing low-lift flow kills low-rpm power. Sometimes it helps power above peak torque, but only sometimes... Yeah, I know most publications say the exact opposite...
|
|
|