 |
|
  |
 |
12-19-2007, 09:14 PM
|
#16
|
  |
|
Re: P-body structural discussion
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Salt Lake & Seattle
My Ride: 92 Duster
Engine: 3.0
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.000
|
The car looks damaged but it looks like the front corner of the car sideswiped a pole. The drivers side of the car isnt even damaged.
I would say the damage is more "looks" then reality. it ripped the front fender cover off and smashed the roofline a little.........
So not really a direct hit on the car. I dont think any car would look good after that kind of accident. Its possible a passenger would have survived with some head trauma (no airbag  ) as the passenger compartment is pretty much intact. Just the corner of the cabin pushes in at the top.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
12-21-2007, 11:40 AM
|
#20
|
  |
|
Re: P-body structural discussion
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Jacksonville, Fl
My Ride: '88 Shelby Z TII
Engine: 2.2 TII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 14.387
|
The problem is our front and rear subframes don't line up #1. #2 they are not at the same vertical level, the front subframe is significantly lower than the rear. Not only that, but there is no lateral connection between the rear subframe rails to connect to like shown on the Barracuda. I've been looking at this for YEARS. To tie the subfraims together under the car is not an easy task. It can be done as I mentioned earlier in the thread. I just wish I could remember where I saw the pictures, or how exactly it was done.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
12-21-2007, 01:05 PM
|
#21
|
  |
|
Re: P-body structural discussion
|
|
Boostaholic
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Wittmann, Arizona
My Ride: 90 Vnt Comp. Shadow
Engine: 2.2 Turbo IV
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
Could it be done on the inside of the car? Along the inside edges of the body along
the floor?
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
12-21-2007, 01:26 PM
|
#22
|
  |
|
Re: P-body structural discussion
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Peterborough, ON
My Ride: 85 Turbo Z, TII
Engine: 2.2L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
Someone needs to put up part drawings so we can fab up parts for strength like the ones in the barracuda link above. Or even make and sell the parts. Reading about all the aparent strength of the rocker panels scares me because mine are both cut out right now.
Pete
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
12-29-2007, 03:03 PM
|
#23
|
  |
|
Re: P-body structural discussion
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Jacksonville, Fl
My Ride: '88 Shelby Z TII
Engine: 2.2 TII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 14.387
|
Sure it could be done inside the car, but the carpet won't fit propperly afterward...
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
01-25-2008, 06:44 AM
|
#26
|
  |
|
Re: P-body structural discussion
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: 610 pa
My Ride: 88 reliant 91 tona
Engine: 2.5
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
the left front frame rail on my 91 daytona is mooshy toward the back... anybody else have this problem? theres no visible rust through the floor pan from the bottom veiw i talked to some hole at the faulkner auto body dump today and asked about he all he seemed to want to do is get a customer...
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
01-25-2008, 10:28 AM
|
#27
|
  |
|
Re: P-body structural discussion
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Jacksonville, Fl
My Ride: '88 Shelby Z TII
Engine: 2.2 TII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 14.387
|
There is material added as The Pope says, however it isn't that thick and it is mearly riveted in. They kind of resemble the old "torque boxes" of the muscle cars. Honestly the convertible P-bodies are HORRIBLE. They didn't add nearly enough material to make them torsionally rigid enough.
The company that did the limited number of convertible G-bodies had the right idea. They added a cross brace under the car as well as a superstructure connecting the b-pillars laterally as well as cross bracing those. I never got to ride in one(yet...I would LOVE to find another one!!), but to me THAT is the way to go!
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
01-25-2008, 10:32 AM
|
#28
|
  |
|
Re: P-body structural discussion
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Dallas, TX
My Ride: 93 Shadow ES
Engine: 3.0L
Induct: N/A
1/4: 0.000
|
Reaper1: Can you get pics of that? Does anyone on here have one? These cars are all basically the same, so it'd be pretty interesting to see how they did that.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
01-25-2008, 10:35 AM
|
#29
|
  |
|
Re: P-body structural discussion
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Jacksonville, Fl
My Ride: '88 Shelby Z TII
Engine: 2.2 TII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 14.387
|
What? Pictures of the 'vert G-body set-up? It'll be a little while before I can. I have the pamphlet that has this stuff highlighted in it, but I'm in Daytona Beach right now at school. I'm going to the Rolex 24 this weekend, so it might have to be next weekend before I can get to it...
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Quick Nav |
|
» Quick Tech |
|
» Market Place |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|