I was considering one of these as well for my 2.5 turbo. This is probably what I will spend that fancy tax rebate check on. I think this engine will gain a lot with the aluminum flywheel. I have mostly a street car so launch is not an issue. I'm just wondering how well it'll work after 20,000+ miles of daily driving.
I have my own theories on how well the flywheel will work, but of course, I have to find out for myself. My 2.5 turbos don't bog between shifts. It'll lay rubber going to the next gear (with the appropriate clutch). Actually, even more effectively than my V-6 Daytona. I like the V-6's instant throttle response. There is no lag, no fooling around.
My twin turbo 6G72 winds up nothing like a N/A SOHC 6G72 does. The SOHC is instant throttle response. My TT engine revs very very much like my 2.5 turbos do... must slower.
>> Chrysler 6g72's have real harmonic dampeners that the Mitsubishi's dont have so
>>they already have more protection from the factory.
My Stealth has one, which is purely a Mitsubishi car. My brain has different knowledge (If you want to call it knowledge) of what harmonic dampers are actually for. I am not going there.
Minnesota 3/S • View topic - Ever seen anything like this fidanza?
Fidanza aluminum flywheel failure... dunno why. Could be installer error.