08-14-2008, 10:56 AM
|
#26
|
  |
|
Re: fidanza flywheels worth it or not?
|
|
TD Extreme User!
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Jacksonville, Fl
My Ride: '88 Shelby Z TII
Engine: 2.2 TII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 14.284
|
Eh...I haven't completely left the 3.0 scene...I still have 2 cars in my backyard with them(and I have 2 complete spare engines!!). I just haven't messed with one in a LONG time. The car I was reffering to is actually my curretn '88 Shelby Z TII car. One day I'll get going again, but as I said to a firend last night, this project is going well, I'm enjoying it, and it's really all I have real time for.
 Quote:
|
|
Did they go into detail about what caused that time delay? I imagine it would be some sort of galvanic corrosion or maybe the friction surface doesn't make perfect contact with the flywheel. Aluminum is pretty good at wicking heat away from stuff. Maybe a big tube of heat-sink compound will help. ...And then maybe design a copper flywheel Sorry, just thinking like a computer guy
|
  |
The time delay with getting heat out of the friction surface is due to the fact that it doesn't make perfect contact with the flywheel. I was thinking like you with aluminum being a fairly good conductor of heat, but since the way the surface is held on to the flywheel in a mechanical way(bolts) and not a press fit, there are bound to be gaps. I suppose heat-sink compund would help, but you'd need a LOT, and the good stuff isn't cheap!
In all honesty if you look a t alot of the places that make the dual-disk stuff, they only make aluminum flywheels if you REALLY want it...otherwise they are steel! The trick is to add the weight where it's needed, and take it waya where it's not. If you can concentrate the mass towards the center, it will still rev up VERY fast!
|
|
|