Automatically adjusting intake ports - Turbo Dodge Forums : Turbo Dodge Forum for Turbo Mopars, Shelbys, Dodge Daytona, Dodge SRT-4, Chrysler PT Cruiser, Omni and more!
Engine - General, Exhaust & Induction Topics about the general engine items, exhaust system discussed here & Improving the intake tract - air filter to intake valve.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 39 Old 04-27-2007, 11:49 AM Thread Starter
Hybrid Booster
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: North Jersey
 
My Ride: '89 Shelby
Engine: 2.2 TII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,517
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
 
Automatically adjusting intake ports

I have been using Powre Lynz for about 2 years now and finally came up with a test that would prove or disprove a controversial claim; that the ports constrict at low flow and open up at higher flow demands. I found a test that strongly suggests that this is indeed happening. I invite you to read about it and look at the numbers posted and give constructive feedback. Check it out here:

Powre Haus Collapsible Boundary Layer

Mike
mpgmike is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 39 Old 04-27-2007, 03:12 PM
- OFFICIAL GEARHEAD -

 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Houghton MI !frosty nights!
 
My Ride: Ram HFE/Omni/SL/XR7
Engine: 2.5 TII+SMEC+.60/.63+2-piece+SRT4 IC+no B/S ;)
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.800

Posts: 8,463
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
 
very interesting & nice work !

I suggest doing the same test (3 different pressure drops) with a stock port to see if the conversions *do* line up ; that would help to further substantiate your claims
detobias is offline  
post #3 of 39 Old 04-27-2007, 07:05 PM
TD Hardcore User!
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Nun-yah, Maine
 
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 2,703
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
 
You findings may be true, but there are a few things to consider. #1) my 10" #s typically flow a tad less than my co-workers bench at 28" #2) 10" to 28" covers alot of ground Meaning... there's 18" of depression between the two. So, the amount of error will obviously be greater than the 28" to 34" comparison. #3) Try the same test with a stock, untouched head and see if the variance is your power lynz or just the nature of the gap between test pressures. I'd back it up with a stock head, and then ONLY perform the power lynz method of your's to the same head and see what hapens from there.

Comparing to baseline info is very important and cannot be argued afterwards. Right?

I am doing an exhaust manifold flowtest. I've done a stocker, a FM ported stocker, a Typert and an ABM header probably tomorrow. I need someone to lend me their FM TBI header or anything else. Results will be in an upcoming SDAC newsletter and then posted on "the other forum." So far, the results have been just as eye opening or more than my intake flowest article in SDAC from last year.

Sometime's in life, it's better to let it go.
DirectConnection is offline  
 
post #4 of 39 Old 04-28-2007, 01:29 PM
Hybrid Booster
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB.
 
My Ride: 88 Daytona Shelby Z
Engine: 2.2 TII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,194
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
 
Perhaps see if Mike has the time to supply a ported stock unit for testing too.

Have a URL to the intake testing results for those that did not see the SDAC newsletter?
scott_s is offline  
post #5 of 39 Old 04-28-2007, 03:21 PM
TD Hardcore User!
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Nun-yah, Maine
 
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 2,703
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
 
Sorry... not allowed to post it here. This is why I have argued
the linking to other sites to the new forum owner. To share information.

PM me your email address and I'll give you a link or type it all out in an email.(very cumbersome that way)
DirectConnection is offline  
post #6 of 39 Old 04-29-2007, 10:48 PM
TD Hardcore User!
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: The Dells in Wisconsin
 
My Ride: '89 Daytona Shelby
Engine: 2.2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 3,900
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by DirectConnection
Sorry... not allowed to post it here.
The information or the link to it Steve?
puppet is offline  
post #7 of 39 Old 04-30-2007, 06:55 PM
TD Hardcore User!
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Nun-yah, Maine
 
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 2,703
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by puppet
The information or the link to it Steve?

The link as it's a tm thread.

PM me your email and I'll send you the info I have that way.
DirectConnection is offline  
post #8 of 39 Old 05-01-2007, 08:38 AM Thread Starter
Hybrid Booster
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: North Jersey
 
My Ride: '89 Shelby
Engine: 2.2 TII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,517
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
 
My intent for posting these results is to spark interest from people that have better access to equipment (like a flow bench as I have to run heads up to the machine shop to have them flowed). I am proposing that texturing the intake ports creates benefits, and have some data to support that claim. The chosen vehicle is screw threads. Dana44 from another forum uses the scallops caused by a chattering carbide bit as his vehicle and claims very positive results.

If other head porters were to take this subject seriously enough to devise their own tests, and perhaps their own frorm of texturing, this whole "port texturing" theory could be refined into very predictable data. Sharing this info puts into the hands of customers better products, regardless of whom the porter is. As a head porter, I'm sharing this info with hopes of getting back testing data from other head porters so that my own process can be improved.

If this is as significant as I think, then it should be shared. It is a tuning tool and not a means to an end (my thoughts on the Somender Grooves as well). So what I'm doing is giving away one of my trade secrets in hopes that the process can be refined by the hands and minds of others.

Mike
mpgmike is offline  
post #9 of 39 Old 05-01-2007, 02:12 PM
Hybrid Booster
 
Join Date: May 2003
 
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,279
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
 
what is the biggest heap of b.s. about the not linking is that the other sites link to here with no problems. The admin have their head up their ass on this one. Also here we can link to other non turbo dodge sites without problem. Funny how the rules are bent to only go after a few sites.
cj011 is offline  
post #10 of 39 Old 05-03-2007, 04:14 PM
TD Hardcore User!
 
Turbo Joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New England
 
My Ride: 87 CSX
Engine: T III 2.2 16v
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 2,336
Images: 23
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj011
what is the biggest heap of b.s. about the not linking is that the other sites link to here with no problems. The admin have their head up their ass on this one. Also here we can link to other non turbo dodge sites without problem. Funny how the rules are bent to only go after a few sites.
this subject has been covered way to many times already. Thank Frank for this. If Frank and others weren't backdoor recruiting then this wouldn't have happened. Now step away from this subject. Nobody really wants to hear it anymore. It starts off with mild bashing then turns into name calling and someone gets warning points or banned, cause they lost there temper...
Nuff said about this... now please go back to the thread subject MPGMIKE has been carring on here. Its definatly interesting.
Turbo Joe is offline  
post #11 of 39 Old 07-14-2007, 06:45 AM
TD Hardcore User!
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Cockeysville,Maryland
 
My Ride: 97 neon
Engine: 2.4L
Induct: N/A
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 2,467
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
 
Powre Linz + Neon

Seemed a good post to bring to light again. Has anyone did any "hands-on" work with this tuning tool? As I no longer have a TD, my neon became my test subject. Never did any head porting before; honestly believed it was beyond me. Have yet to save the cash for the head MPG Mike did for me, so I mocked up one. Took a dohc head and began cutting away. Did not have access to the tools Mike has, so the dremel was the next best thing. Here are some pics of MPG Mike's work:



And here is the combustion chamber of the dohc head Mike did for me:



Here are some pics of my efforts over the past two weeks or so:







In ingtake side has been done. Since Mike made his own custom tools to texture the intake runner, the cutting saw on my dremel did a decent job. Will have pics up later today.

On a long enough time line, the survival rate for everybody drops to zero.

86 Aries TBI:
turbo rad fan, 4 tb spacers, K&N, tb coolant bypass, filled engine mounts, 3-wire 02, modded oil pick-up, TRW rear springs, sensa-trac shocks
Jack's Dodge is offline  
post #12 of 39 Old 07-14-2007, 08:42 AM
TD Hardcore User!
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: St. Louis
 
My Ride: 2GTS,SL,2TC,88DAYSHE
Engine: 2.2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 3,312
Images: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
 
I think we need a aerospace engineer here. I know Mc Donell and Douglas used to encourage employees to use the equipment during down times for their own projects.
That was 40 years ago though. The last development I heard of like that, the company patented the info and I had to sign a contract before the lecture. If I use the info, it cost me $350 per unit (pianos) to use it.
looneytuner is offline  
post #13 of 39 Old 07-14-2007, 09:07 PM
Hybrid Booster
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Gresham, Oregon
 
My Ride: '89 plymouth voyager
Engine: 2.5 T1
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 16.800

Posts: 1,894
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by looneytuner
I think we need a aerospace engineer here. I know Mc Donell and Douglas used to encourage employees to use the equipment during down times for their own projects.
That was 40 years ago though. The last development I heard of like that, the company patented the info and I had to sign a contract before the lecture. If I use the info, it cost me $350 per unit (pianos) to use it.
Or just a grad student that needs a project
tkelly27 is offline  
post #14 of 39 Old 07-16-2007, 07:33 PM
Hybrid Booster
 
Join Date: May 2003
 
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,279
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
 
Is it just me or does the DOHC scream please dear God raise the port floors.
cj011 is offline  
post #15 of 39 Old 07-18-2007, 10:24 PM
TD New Guy
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: State College, PA
 
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 12
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by mpgmike
I am proposing that texturing the intake ports creates benefits, and have some data to support that claim. The chosen vehicle is screw threads. Dana44 from another forum uses the scallops caused by a chattering carbide bit as his vehicle and claims very positive results.

If other head porters were to take this subject seriously enough to devise their own tests, and perhaps their own frorm of texturing, this whole "port texturing" theory could be refined into very predictable data.

If this is as significant as I think, .

Mike
Intake port surface finish HAS been hashed & re-hashed over and over & over by alot of very noted head porters & engine builders. Your ideas are not new.... It's just that most of the ones playing with this stuff don't share their info/research.

What you are trying to do is create a thicker turbulent boundry layer. It looks great on paper, but every back to back test I have ever heard of on a dyno has showed absolutely zero difference. I know of one noted NHRA Pro Stock builder on the East coast here who was playing with wild textured surface finishes as recently as year ago and saw no gains. No offense, but go get your hands on some Nascar or current NHRA Comp Eliminator or P/S heads and see what they are doing for surface finish. I've had a bunch of Current Nascar P7 Dodge heads in my hands, along with CFE Comp eliminator heads etc. It's nothing "exotic" Most of that stuff is sand rolled with a 60 or an 80 roll to eliminate the "step over" lines from the CNC. Now there is some benefit to "chattering up" the intake seats at the throat area. This helps both with wet flow & also with slowing the airspeed slightly as it is crossing the seat angles.

Sorry, but just my semi educated opinion having ported alot of high end heads over the years, at least on a Naturally aspirated motor (the ones that actually take alot of thinking to make HP out of) There is no benefit ever been shown from a rough surface finish of any kind. And if it does'nt work in NA application like I said that takes everything you can to make power with, I really doubt you'd see any gain an a boosted application either. I used to beat my brain on this very subject for years, I would look at ports & swear a rough carbide intake port HAD to make more power than a smooth one... It just seemed "logical" And yet whenever I talked to guys who had tried it on the big $ stuff it never made anything. After seeing enough big $ heads in person that had very smooth sand roll intake ports, I came to the realization it has to be a pipe dream.

One thing I will say in your defense, is that it won't HURT anything..... so.... Add all the lines/texture you want. It definitely makes it look different/neat.

My best advice would be to start spending more time playing with valve seat angles/widths/top cuts/valve radiuses/back cuts, now there is some-where you can make or break a head power wise. 100 hours of reserach on the seats will yield 100X more power gains than playing with surface finish. ;)
RyanJ is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Turbo Dodge Forums : Turbo Dodge Forum for Turbo Mopars, Shelbys, Dodge Daytona, Dodge SRT-4, Chrysler PT Cruiser, Omni and more! forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

Member names may only be composed of alpha-numeric characters. (A-Z and 0-9)

!!ATTENTION ADVERTISERS!! If you intend on advertising anything on this forum, whatsoever, you are required to first contact us here . Additionaly, we do NOT allow BUSINESS NAMES unless you are an Authorized Vendor. If you own a business, and want to do sales on this site via posting or private message, you will need to follow the rules. Shops, Stores, Distributors, Group Buys without being authorized will see your account terminated.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome