new S.S. header possable

[mopar2ya]

Seems to me FWDP has a equal length 8V header.

[turbovanman]

Quote:

Originally Posted by mopar2ya Seems to me FWDP has a equal length 8V header.

True, but I think he wants to build his own,

[Super60Dodge]

Quote:

Originally Posted by mopar2ya Seems to me FWDP has a equal length 8V header.

Where I cant find it on there site?

[mopar2ya]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Super60Dodge Nope each port will have it's own runner. The only thing that sux is we cant find an easy way to make the tubes equal do to the intake manifold. Joe

I dont think she has it listed on her site, just like the hybrid intake manifolds. You just need to call her. there was a post with some pics quite a while back.

[bill baker]

You mean something like this?Id pay up to $400 for it,but it have to show some kind of improvement over a ported stocker.Ive heard nothing about back to back dyno pulls yet....


http://www.turboford.net/sponsors/ro...s/IM002796.jpg

Bill Baker
NESDAC president
90 shadow 332HP and 390TQ
12.27@116MPH

[GLHNSLHT2]

still like it to work with a divided scroll.

[mopar2ya]

The one FWDP has is equal length.

[GLHNSLHT2]

You'd think you'd have pics of something like that on your website. Till I see pics I'm not gonna pass judgement. So far all headers I've seen sans 1 have been log style, or a TBI version, not fond of SMP's because it merges 2 into 1 then to the turbo. I want something like the Turbo ford guys have but with a little more care taken in the collector area so that if I want to use it with a dual scroll I can. I'd like the option of an external gate and a T3 bolt pattern. Super60's idea of a header sounds just like what I am thinking but I'll wait for pics from him.

[SMPerformance]

Quote:

Originally Posted by GLHNSLHT2 not fond of SMP's because it merges 2 into 1 then to the turbo.

yeah your right Bad design funny I run the same 4 into 2 into 1 to the turbo on my race car

do you know wath exhaust pulse tuning is ??? do a seach

if I listen to everybody Including the GM engineers they dont understand how I can spool a turbo with my long 2 into 1 header I dont believe in pre dertemined rules I do R&D on TD'S

everybody as opinions but build me a header that will provide produce more horsepower (1000HP)them mine at the same boost level and spool a gt42R 33 psi at 4500 rpm then Ill admit my design is bad and I will buy one !

[SMPerformance]

Also

Dyno test done on the 8 valve header showed a 19.7whp increase on a stock 1989 T-II daytona back to back test

and the same header showed a 54.2whp increase on a T-II omni with a ported head, big turbo, big FMIC and FWD cal back to back test

also would like to had that I do not offer anymore 8 valve header

test where done same day for each cars Dyno is a land & Sea Dynomite
dynamometers

[bill baker]

Is your header the one FWDP sells??

do you have a pic? I might be interested..

bill baker
NESDAC president

[powermaxx]

+2

Quote:

Originally Posted by bill baker Is your header the one FWDP sells?? do you have a pic? I might be interested.. bill baker NESDAC president

[SMPerformance]

Quote:

Originally Posted by bill baker Is your header the one FWDP sells?? do you have a pic? I might be interested.. bill baker NESDAC president

Yes it was sold By FWD Performance

designed it in 2003 since then a minor modification was done to it I think Cindy might still have one in stock





I do not Fab them no more It was more then discussed on this board that this header was a bad design so I took the decision to not release them to the public anymore.

[Ondonti]

The GT42 has a divided scroll right? I have had good luck with a divided manifold and housing on my v6.

[SMPerformance]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ondonti The GT42 has a divided scroll right? I have had good luck with a divided manifold and housing on my v6.

yep divided scroll I use a 1.28 A/R on the exhaust