 |
|
  |
 |
11-20-2005, 04:45 PM
|
#46
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Wichita, Kansas
My Ride: 2004 SRT4
Engine: 2.4
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.680
|
Warren, that is the most beautiful header or turbo manifold I have ever seen in my life. BIG TIME kudos for that. Unbeliveable workmanship.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
11-20-2005, 06:00 PM
|
#47
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: North Attleboro, MA
My Ride: 87 Shadow
Engine: 2.2L 16v Hybrid
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
awesome!! cant wait to see some numbers.
Mucho Kudos.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
11-20-2005, 06:25 PM
|
#48
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Salt Lake & Seattle
My Ride: 92 Duster
Engine: 3.0
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 12.700
|
 Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Juggy
There was something on Spike TV a whiles back, where they put a turbo on a camaro, and the turbo was at THE BACK of the car....anyway the turbo wasnt laggy at all, and of course has zero backpressure being it at the end of the vehicle.
So if you have a properly designed equal length header, I think it will definetly improve spool time/power, even tho they require longer tubing
oh yeah...
PS....that damn header gave me morning wood!  hahaha
|
  |
Those remote mounted turbo's also make a lot less hp then a normal turbo setup. I get tired of people saying thats the only place they have room. Guy here in utah has twin t-67's in his engine bay. He ran a 9 on 11 psi boost.
The remote mounted guys run 13's here on higher boost (we are high elevation). STS turbo's actually is based here in utah. They get no respect from local racers.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
11-20-2005, 09:04 PM
|
#50
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: North Dakota
My Ride: 84 Chrysler Laser
Engine: 92 com. blk. 2.2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 10.600
|
A couple people asked if the header would fit in a L body, I would like to know. Could someone make two measurements for me, as I don't have a L body to check. You would need to measure the distance from the right end (machined flat area) of the block to the frame rail, and from the lower block P/S mounting bracket boss straight back to the steering rack. All other dimensions should be fine. The photo below shows that the firewall clearence is not an issue, as the header is on the engine in this shot.......Warren
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
11-20-2005, 09:10 PM
|
#51
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: North Dakota
My Ride: 84 Chrysler Laser
Engine: 92 com. blk. 2.2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 10.600
|
You can see what I'm talking about better from this angle. The secondary pipe loops hang out past the block 4 inches, Is there room in a L body in this area? Could someone measure please?
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
11-20-2005, 09:20 PM
|
#52
|
  |
|
|
|
Boostaholic
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Surrey, B.C.
My Ride: '92 IROC R/T
Engine: 2.2 135ci TIII 16v
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
I'm at work right now but if, by then no one has measured, I'll do it. I own a GLH and a Rampage.
__________________
'01 Maxima SE
'92 Chrylser Daytona IROC R/T-t3/t4 ceramic dbb stg III turbo, adj. Konis w/ Eibachs, dyno 217hp @ 11psi at the wheels w/ stock parts.
'84 TIII Rampage-LWP Stage II port with LWP Stage I cams, port matched manifolds (work in progress).
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
11-21-2005, 12:03 AM
|
#53
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Milw. WI
My Ride: No slicks Omni
Engine: 2.2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 12.036
|
 Quote:
|
Originally Posted by 2.2=8
The secondary pipe loops hang out past the block 4 inches, Is there room in a L body in this area? Could someone measure please?
|
  |
How low does the secondary pipe hang below block deck height?
Spent enough time swapping and fabbing to see there will be no
problem at all on top end but it looks like passenger floor pan will
be an issue (not realy as metal is easily welded up after cutting!).
Here is an undercar shot, TBI header and custom slash cut/welded
2.5" swingvalve. Pic may help a little but I will measure for you when
I know drop of your pipe from deck height.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
11-21-2005, 12:08 AM
|
#54
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Brantford,Ont, Canada
My Ride: Dodge Omni GLH clone
Engine: 2.2 inline 4
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.100
|
The power steerin pump pulley on an l body is very close to the frame rail( baby finger may fit between them). With a bad engine alignment and mounts, the pulley can grind away at the rail in hard left turns. That runner may come into contact with the same frame rail.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
11-21-2005, 12:16 AM
|
#55
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: North Dakota
My Ride: 84 Chrysler Laser
Engine: 92 com. blk. 2.2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 10.600
|
Russ, The lower secondary loop is 2 inches above the right side axle (one piece shaft) and about 1/2 inch higher than the block oil pan rail. For some reason the whole header looks larger in the photos than it really is.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
11-21-2005, 12:20 AM
|
#56
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: North Dakota
My Ride: 84 Chrysler Laser
Engine: 92 com. blk. 2.2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 10.600
|
 Quote:
|
Originally Posted by omnivore
The power steerin pump pulley on an l body is very close to the frame rail( baby finger may fit between them). With a bad engine alignment and mounts, the pulley can grind away at the rail in hard left turns. That runner may come into contact with the same frame rail.
|
  |
But how far is the frame rail from the block face?
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
11-21-2005, 02:58 AM
|
#57
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Milw. WI
My Ride: No slicks Omni
Engine: 2.2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 12.036
|
 Quote:
|
Originally Posted by 2.2=8
Russ, The lower secondary loop is 2 inches above the right side axle (one piece shaft) and about 1/2 inch higher than the block oil pan rail. For some reason the whole header looks larger in the photos than it really is. 
|
  |
Wow it will fit!!! 2am and cold ass hell out I will take some pics for
you in daylight,that is some tricky angles you worked into that header!
That side shot you just posted tells a good story, had to go out
a second time and view my car. That is some very creative use
of space you got going on bud!
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
11-21-2005, 10:53 AM
|
#58
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Jacksonville, Fl
My Ride: '88 Shelby Z TII
Engine: 2.2 TII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 14.284
|
I need a towel!!!
VERY nice. Better than any of the solutions I've come up with. The only thing I see is that it's going to be a mjor PITA to get to the starter...oh well.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Quick Nav |
|
» Quick Tech |
|
» Market Place |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|