TurboDodge.com MarketPlace Shelby Registry Contact Us

Advertisement - Remove these ads today by clicking here.
 

Go Back   TurboDodge.Com - Turbo Dodge forum for Turbo Mopars, Shelbys, Daytona, SRT-4, PT Cruiser, Omni and more! > Turbo Dodge Technical Chat > Engine - Exhaust

Engine - Exhaust Topics about the exhaust system discussed here.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools

Old 11-29-2005, 01:29 AM   #106
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MN

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 3,461
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by turbovanman
Your a moron!
I was joking around, Warren got it, why couldn't you?



Anyhow, back to our scheduled program-

What about using the slip fit and using springs like we do on our Motorbikes. We use Titanium systems and they don't leak. There mounted solidly and don't snap or fatique crack?
I would expect more from a Moderator.
Calling People Names? I think that is against the "Rules of TurboDodge.com".

So consider this a warning. Next time it is a ban.
DakotaKid is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2005, 03:32 AM   #107
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Salt Lake & Seattle

My Ride: 92 Duster
Engine: 3.0
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 12.700

Posts: 7,722
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank
Its a catch 22 though. Its the same type of example as some motorcycles. Some like the twin fire to keep the wheel from slipping in a turn, while others like spaced out firing because they think that the torque is more controllable in a turn.

Same thing here... they both provide benifits, but they dont really effect you either way.


Frank
I was only talking about how pulses strike the turbine blade, not how the motor makes actual hp. People were talking about using divided housings and all that. I just know that separating the pulses allows each to make a good "slap" at the turbine blade rather then have them "blah" together.

People were using some wrong ideas about "evening out flow" which may be great for power or whatever, but is not relevent to the idea behind helping a turbo spool by keeping exhaust pulses as separate as is possible. Obviously if they never meet......they will be farther separated. I guess one problem is that some say these divided housing turbines dont flow very well. I dont know a thing about that and I'm pretty sure its not a big deal. .
Ondonti is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2005, 03:38 AM   #108
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Salt Lake & Seattle

My Ride: 92 Duster
Engine: 3.0
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 12.700

Posts: 7,722
Feedback: (0)
Just build a hanger that can move around with the turbo......but support its weight.
Ondonti is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2005, 04:59 AM   #109
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: www.TurboDodge.com

My Ride: 1991 Daytona Shelby
Engine: 2.5L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.000

Posts: 2,857
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrboVan
I would expect more from a Moderator.
Calling People Names? I think that is against the "Rules of TurboDodge.com".

So consider this a warning. Next time it is a ban.
What are you doing in this thread? You baited him with your stunts. You knock it off. Simon, please ignore him and dont respond any more. Bryan, dont respond in this thread unless its technical.


Frank
Frank is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2005, 02:02 PM   #110
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MN

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 3,461
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank
What are you doing in this thread? You baited him with your stunts. You knock it off. Simon, please ignore him and dont respond any more. Bryan, dont respond in this thread unless its technical.


Frank
If you are going to delete posts then delete ALL of the BS ones including yours.
Thanks
DakotaKid is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2005, 03:31 PM   #111
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Chicago, IL

My Ride: 1995 Dodge Avenger
Engine: 3.15L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 51
Feedback: (0)
That is one nice piece of art

Why use 304L though and not 321? Less prone to cracking from thermal cycles even in 16gauge compared to 304L.
SANDMAN is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2005, 04:09 PM   #112
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: North Dakota

My Ride: 84 Chrysler Laser
Engine: 92 com. blk. 2.2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 10.600

Posts: 340
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SANDMAN
That is one nice piece of art

Why use 304L though and not 321? Less prone to cracking from thermal cycles even in 16gauge compared to 304L.
Because I happened to have a pile of 304L mandrel bends and straights in stock.......321 would have been my first choice but man that stuffs expensive. Besides, I want to test my design in something cheap first, I may want to build something completely different.
2.2=8 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2005, 04:23 PM   #113
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Rochester, MI/UNO, Lima, OH

My Ride: 1986 Shelby Charger
Engine: 2.2 SOHC
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,128
Feedback: (0)
Warren, have you ever thougth about pulling all the tubes over to the drivers side to locate the turbo facing forward just above the tranny? Access to it for piping (a REAL intake!! Although I think you already have that covered) and exhaust routing would be easy, as well as changes easy too. It would only require a slight lengthening of the last tube section.

Is there any reason you wanted to keep it near the stock location?

Aaron Miller
GLHandGTS is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2005, 04:28 PM   #114
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Chicago, IL

My Ride: 1995 Dodge Avenger
Engine: 3.15L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 51
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2.2=8
Because I happened to have a pile of 304L mandrel bends and straights in stock.......321 would have been my first choice but man that stuffs expensive. Besides, I want to test my design in something cheap first, I may want to build something completely different.
Tell me about it, you nearly have to sell your left testicle to get material. I ran into the same problem when I built a 420A turbo header. If you think the piping is $$ try getting flange material........ 2nd mortgage, then the other testicle.


Looks great though, if I had a TD I'd nab one BUT ALAS I am a V6 junkie
SANDMAN is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2005, 05:31 PM   #115
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Abbotsford, BC, Canada

My Ride: 1989 Turbo Caravan
Engine: 2.5L 8V Sohc
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.400

Posts: 14,727
Feedback: (2)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2.2=8
Besides, I want to test my design in something cheap first, I may want to build something completely different.
If you run it and don't like, I would like to be first in line for the free tossing away of the header,
turbovanman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2005, 05:42 PM   #116
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: The Dells in Wisconsin

My Ride: '89 Daytona Shelby
Engine: 2.2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 3,107
Feedback: (1)
Quote:
Originally Posted by turbovanman
If you run it and don't like, I would like to be first in line for the free tossing away of the header,
heh ... that'd be like the Friday after Thanksgiving in Walmart.
puppet is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2005, 08:19 PM   #117
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Here, there..everywhere.

My Ride: 2003 SRT-4
Engine: 2.4 DOHC Turbo
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 603
Feedback: (0)
Absolutely one of the most beautiful pieces I seen for any car, much less at TD. Almost seems too nice for the car I've been looking back at some of your other post's and the level of workmanship is amazing. Great looking parts, you should compile all of the pictures you have and put them in one post for everyone to gaze at and drool.
TurboGLH is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2005, 09:20 PM   #118
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Ravenna, Ohio

My Ride: 89 Spirit ES
Engine: 2.5 STD TII 20psi
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.726

Posts: 2,311
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by TurboGLH
Absolutely one of the most beautiful pieces I seen for any car, much less at TD. Almost seems too nice for the car I've been looking back at some of your other post's and the level of workmanship is amazing. Great looking parts, you should compile all of the pictures you have and put them in one post for everyone to gaze at and drool.
++++++++++++1
Dave is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2005, 10:45 AM   #119
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MN

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 3,461
Feedback: (0)
Warren,
I am not sure, maybe I missed it, but are you going to be placing EGT probes anywhere?

Thanks
Bryan
DakotaKid is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2005, 11:33 AM   #120
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: North Dakota

My Ride: 84 Chrysler Laser
Engine: 92 com. blk. 2.2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 10.600

Posts: 340
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrboVan
Warren,
I am not sure, maybe I missed it, but are you going to be placing EGT probes anywhere?

Thanks
Bryan
Yes I'm planning on it, but that will be last. Don't yet know where or how many to weld in.
2.2=8 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

» Quick Nav
- Home
- Classifieds
- Timeslips
- Gallery
- Vendors
-- Directory
- Tech Articles
- Donate
Sponsors
remove ads

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1
Bankruptcy | Ringtones | Nicole Kidman Blog | Debt Consolidation | Debt Consolidation


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:49 PM.