 |
|
  |
 |
11-03-2006, 07:41 PM
|
#1
|
  |
|
New down pipe question
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Tallahassee, FL
My Ride: 1986 Dodge Daytona
Engine: 2.5 TBI
Induct: N/A
1/4: 0.000
|
Was there any 2.5" application from the factory on a G body or other that would work on an '86 Daytona?
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
11-03-2006, 08:02 PM
|
#2
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Gresham, Oregon
My Ride: '89 plymouth voyager
Engine: 2.2 TII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 16.800
|
I don't think it's an issue with the downpipe, I think it's the swingvalve that is the problem. If you had a 2.5" swingvalve I think it'd go... don't quote me on that though
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
11-04-2006, 09:41 AM
|
#3
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Peterborough, Ontario
My Ride: 89 Chrysler Daytona
Engine: 88 2.2 T1-T2 upgrade
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 15.800
|
86 had 2.25" swingvalve and downpipe, you could have a shopmake a downpipe with a transition from 2.25" - 2.5" to help you out a bit but getting a new swingvalve will help more.
88 T2 cars had a 2.25" SV with the large flange that bolts to a 2.5" exhaust.
89 T2 cars had a 2.5" swingvalve and the large 2.5" flange for 2.5" exhaust.
all other stock turbo cars with a garret turbo had a 2.25" swingvalve and the small 2.25" flange for 2.25 exhaust.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
11-04-2006, 09:20 PM
|
#4
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Tallahassee, FL
My Ride: 1986 Dodge Daytona
Engine: 2.5 TBI
Induct: N/A
1/4: 0.000
|
89 T2 was the only year with the 2.5" swing valve and large flange? Did they keep these (the size) in the later years like '90 and above? It sounds weird that they would use the larger size only in '89. What did the T3 have I wonder?
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
11-05-2006, 06:47 PM
|
#5
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Peterborough, Ontario
My Ride: 89 Chrysler Daytona
Engine: 88 2.2 T1-T2 upgrade
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 15.800
|
Not sure on the T3 cars Sv size.
They only made T2 cars for 87-88-89 thats why only one year for the true 2.5" SV.
The only other 2.5 SV is on a mitsu turbo 89 and up I think, and it is not compatible with a garrett turbo
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
11-06-2006, 09:36 AM
|
#6
|
  |
|
|
|
Authorized TD Vendor
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Spring, Texas
1/4: 0.000
|
The 89-up cars had a 2.5 inch downpipe. They are fairly universal. To use on a 2.25 swingvalve, all you have to do is elongate the bolt holes on the DP flange until they match the spacing on your 2.25 sv. They will bolt right up. Use a new 2.50 donut.
later,
Cindy
__________________
FWD Performance… One stop no hassle shopping for your front wheel drive turbo car. Custom calibrations, T1,2,3,&,4. 2bar/3bar, 8v or 16v, including hybrids. Bank on over ten years of calibration R&D and thousands of street, track and daily drivers around the world. www.fwdperformance.com
Your FWDperformance Team
281-288-4411 or 281-642-3878
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
11-06-2006, 10:49 PM
|
#7
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Tallahassee, FL
My Ride: 1986 Dodge Daytona
Engine: 2.5 TBI
Induct: N/A
1/4: 0.000
|
Thanks to all. When I go with the 2.5" down pipe I'll change the entire system. This will include the swingvalve to include a change to the 2.5" as well.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
07-19-2007, 10:36 AM
|
#11
|
  |
|
|
|
Resident piston cracker
Join Date: May 2003
Location: CT
My Ride: 92gtc vert
Engine: 2.5 8v
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 9.800
|
 Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Michael_Valenti
I'm interested in your 2.5" Kit for my 86 Daytona Turbo Z and was wondering if you had any pics showing what you mean with elongating the bolt holes on the Down Pipe. Thanks! 
|
  |
Here you do it to the flange you grind away the red with a dremel or a file, here is an ultra precise 3d autocad, it took me 4 hours. Hope it helps!
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
07-19-2007, 11:30 AM
|
#13
|
  |
|
|
|
Resident piston cracker
Join Date: May 2003
Location: CT
My Ride: 92gtc vert
Engine: 2.5 8v
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 9.800
|
 Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Michael_Valenti
The Turbo was rebuild about 3 Years (6000 miles) ago by the previous owner so it might have been removed during that time.
|
  |
You might be ok as long as the bolts weren't overtightened and antiseize was used. There is one bolt that you have to stick your ratchet with a short socket into the exhaust hole to get at it.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Quick Nav |
|
» Quick Tech |
|
» Market Place |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|