 |
|
  |
 |
12-01-2006, 10:36 AM
|
#1
|
  |
|
T.U header vs Ported Manifold
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: quakertown
My Ride: shadow/spiritrt/mini
Engine: 2.2 intercooled
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 14.200
|
Title says it all.
Which is the better performer?
Which has better flow?
I believe the ported exhaust manifold flows 30% better than a stock one.
Does anyone have flow rates of these headers?
I am running a ported exhaust but would consider buying a header if the rate of flow is higher.
Thanks...............................ryan
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
12-01-2006, 11:15 AM
|
#3
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
My Ride: DOdge Shadow ES
Engine: 2.5l
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 15.160
|
This isn't a TU unit but it is the one I made and will have similar flow. The bottom one is a mildly ported stocker. I think the difference is pretty obvious.
DJ
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
12-01-2006, 12:56 PM
|
#6
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: May 2004
Location: BCM
My Ride: 2.4 Turbo Spirit
Engine: 2.4 DOHC
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
 Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Chris W
Due to where the header places the swingvalve it cannot be done with our 3" version. The swingvalve must be cut apart and rewelded with a 90 degree angle. The bend will reduce the flow numbers more.
Chris-TU
|
  |
It can be done you just have to have more firewall clearance and place the turbo up higher
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
12-01-2006, 01:25 PM
|
#8
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: www.TurboDodge.com
My Ride: 1991 Daytona Shelby
Engine: 2.5L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.000
|
Also make sure that when you tap the stainless steel for the egt probes, you use a good tap. I ended up just having my machinest drill and tap them because he just so happened to have my block already and he wasnt going to charge me. The stuff is tough!
Frank
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
12-01-2006, 03:09 PM
|
#9
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB.
My Ride: 88 Daytona Shelby Z
Engine: 2.2 TII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
Not all ported stockers are created equal. I had a self ported mani on my TII and then went with a ported stocker ported by someone else with more experience. My boost went up 1-2psi from 10-11 to 12psi, with the better ported unit. To me, that demonstrates reduced restriction, hence better flow.
The header DJ showed, increased his boost by 3psi over a ported stock mani. Showing an even greater flow increase. The mani was the only thing changed on his setup.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
12-01-2006, 09:00 PM
|
#11
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB.
My Ride: 88 Daytona Shelby Z
Engine: 2.2 TII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
That is it cold outside?
Down in AZ, how cold can get it get?? We have been bouncing off -40C too much this winter.
I have noticed a boost increase in the cold as well. My 2 cents would be that you are using a spring controlled MBC. The cold causes the spring to shrink up a little. Enough that the boost level changes. A friend was tired of that happening. Here it would be more than a 1 psi increase in the boost level. He changed his MBC to ones with out a spring. No more problems for him.
In the cases, I mentioned the temp was pretty much constant from before to after.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
12-02-2006, 03:30 PM
|
#13
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ
My Ride: 87 GLHS
Engine: 2.2 TII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
 Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Frank
Also make sure that when you tap the stainless steel for the egt probes, you use a good tap. I ended up just having my machinest drill and tap them because he just so happened to have my block already and he wasnt going to charge me. The stuff is tough!
Frank
|
  |
Agreed, I broke my first Harbor freight tap when I did it. I finally got it out and was able to finish it with a second tap. It definately damaged both taps before I was done but I finally got a clean thread.
-Rich
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
12-02-2006, 06:03 PM
|
#14
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Allentown, PA
My Ride: '69 chevy, '03 WRX
Engine: 358 600hp, 2.0 turbo
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
Um, about the TU header, vs the manifold. How about durability of the TU unit? Are they known to crack??? I wouldn't mind investing in one, but I have heard from the wieght of the turbo, and excessive heat, that aftermarket headers crack....any opinion on this?
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
12-02-2006, 08:36 PM
|
#15
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Gresham, Oregon
My Ride: '89 plymouth voyager
Engine: 2.2 TII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 16.800
|
thin wall or long tube headers can and do crack. TU's are neither thin walled nor long tubed, so IMO it should be plenty durable. Also I think for the price, if one broke the unlucky TD owner would make a HUGE stink about it on here. Not that the price is unreasonable, it's just more than most TDers pay for their whole cars.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Quick Nav |
|
» Quick Tech |
|
» Market Place |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|