TurboDodge.com MarketPlace Shelby Registry Contact Us

Advertisement - Remove these ads today by clicking here.
 

Go Back   TurboDodge.Com - Turbo Dodge forum for Turbo Mopars, Shelbys, Daytona, SRT-4, PT Cruiser, Omni and more! > Turbo Dodge Technical Chat > Engine - Exhaust

Engine - Exhaust Topics about the exhaust system discussed here.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools

Old 12-01-2006, 10:36 AM   #1
T.U header vs Ported Manifold  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: quakertown

My Ride: shadow/spiritrt/mini
Engine: 2.2 intercooled
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 14.200

Posts: 239
Feedback: (1)
Title says it all.
Which is the better performer?
Which has better flow?
I believe the ported exhaust manifold flows 30% better than a stock one.
Does anyone have flow rates of these headers?
I am running a ported exhaust but would consider buying a header if the rate of flow is higher.
Thanks...............................ryan
1990 shadow vnt is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2006, 11:04 AM   #2
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Mesa, AZ.

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 6,996
Feedback: (32)
Which is the better performer? - TU
Which has better flow? - TU
I believe the ported exhaust manifold flows 30% better than a stock one. - 10% if you're lucky.
Does anyone have flow rates of these headers? - Yes, Chris W have it posted on the board, do a search. - flow rates goes TBI header > TU header > ported exhaust manifold
I am running a ported exhaust but would consider buying a header if the rate of flow is higher. -Better start saving your pennies.

Last edited by tryingbe; 12-01-2006 at 01:46 PM.
tryingbe is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2006, 11:15 AM   #3
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB

My Ride: DOdge Shadow ES
Engine: 2.5l
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 15.160

Posts: 309
Feedback: (0)
This isn't a TU unit but it is the one I made and will have similar flow. The bottom one is a mildly ported stocker. I think the difference is pretty obvious.



DJ
turboshad is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2006, 12:36 PM   #4
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The "other" sites now

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 693
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris W
The TU header can be used in conjuncton with our 3" swingvalve allowing a 44% increase in flow in comparison to the 2.5" swingvalve with the TBI.

Chris-TU
Ok.. how about after mating a 3" SV with the TBI? Just curious what the flow's comparison is then....
88_Pacifica is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2006, 12:47 PM   #5
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The "other" sites now

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 693
Feedback: (0)
^^ Nice then... +1 I had to make sure we were comparing apples-to-apples.
88_Pacifica is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2006, 12:56 PM   #6
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: BCM

My Ride: 2.4 Turbo Spirit
Engine: 2.4 DOHC
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 2,025
Feedback: (2)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris W
Due to where the header places the swingvalve it cannot be done with our 3" version. The swingvalve must be cut apart and rewelded with a 90 degree angle. The bend will reduce the flow numbers more.
Chris-TU
It can be done you just have to have more firewall clearance and place the turbo up higher
speeduphoria is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2006, 01:13 PM   #7
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: www.TurboDodge.com

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,219
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris W
I'm sure that's possible but not everyone is willing to massage their firewall especially if their car is numbered. The TBI header we flowed was the version where the SV needed to be modified. Another design might provide different flow numbers.

Chris-TU

That's right. I wasn't going to bang in my GLHS's firewall to fit my T3/T4 turbo. I had to tweak the heater core coolant line to fit my huge turbo in the car. The 3" swingvalve and downpipe worked with only a little adjustment to the end of the DP (where the rod shifter was). Which in my case didn't matter because it was getting a whole new exhaust. The TU header is a LOT easier to install then a TBI. It prolly comes out about the same cost if you couldn't make the plate and weld the TBI yourself.
DodgeZ is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2006, 01:25 PM   #8
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: www.TurboDodge.com

My Ride: 1991 Daytona Shelby
Engine: 2.5L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.000

Posts: 2,857
Feedback: (0)
Also make sure that when you tap the stainless steel for the egt probes, you use a good tap. I ended up just having my machinest drill and tap them because he just so happened to have my block already and he wasnt going to charge me. The stuff is tough!


Frank
Frank is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2006, 03:09 PM   #9
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB.

My Ride: 88 Daytona Shelby Z
Engine: 2.2 TII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,179
Feedback: (0)
Not all ported stockers are created equal. I had a self ported mani on my TII and then went with a ported stocker ported by someone else with more experience. My boost went up 1-2psi from 10-11 to 12psi, with the better ported unit. To me, that demonstrates reduced restriction, hence better flow.

The header DJ showed, increased his boost by 3psi over a ported stock mani. Showing an even greater flow increase. The mani was the only thing changed on his setup.
scott_s is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2006, 06:49 PM   #10
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Mesa, AZ.

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 6,996
Feedback: (32)
My boost goes up 1psi just because it's cold outside, does that mean anything?
tryingbe is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2006, 09:00 PM   #11
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB.

My Ride: 88 Daytona Shelby Z
Engine: 2.2 TII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,179
Feedback: (0)
That is it cold outside?

Down in AZ, how cold can get it get?? We have been bouncing off -40C too much this winter.

I have noticed a boost increase in the cold as well. My 2 cents would be that you are using a spring controlled MBC. The cold causes the spring to shrink up a little. Enough that the boost level changes. A friend was tired of that happening. Here it would be more than a 1 psi increase in the boost level. He changed his MBC to ones with out a spring. No more problems for him.

In the cases, I mentioned the temp was pretty much constant from before to after.
scott_s is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2006, 10:58 PM   #12
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Mesa, AZ.

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 6,996
Feedback: (32)
Well, go from 120F to 45Fish... it's cold. Though, still have plenty of traction.

Oh yeah, we have track open down here all winter.
tryingbe is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2006, 03:30 PM   #13
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ

My Ride: 87 GLHS
Engine: 2.2 TII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 672
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank
Also make sure that when you tap the stainless steel for the egt probes, you use a good tap. I ended up just having my machinest drill and tap them because he just so happened to have my block already and he wasnt going to charge me. The stuff is tough!


Frank
Agreed, I broke my first Harbor freight tap when I did it. I finally got it out and was able to finish it with a second tap. It definately damaged both taps before I was done but I finally got a clean thread.

-Rich
rfb6435 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2006, 06:03 PM   #14
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Allentown, PA

My Ride: '69 chevy, '03 WRX
Engine: 358 600hp, 2.0 turbo
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 880
Feedback: (13)
Um, about the TU header, vs the manifold. How about durability of the TU unit? Are they known to crack??? I wouldn't mind investing in one, but I have heard from the wieght of the turbo, and excessive heat, that aftermarket headers crack....any opinion on this?
Csx254 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2006, 08:36 PM   #15
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Gresham, Oregon

My Ride: '89 plymouth voyager
Engine: 2.2 TII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 16.800

Posts: 1,796
Feedback: (1)
thin wall or long tube headers can and do crack. TU's are neither thin walled nor long tubed, so IMO it should be plenty durable. Also I think for the price, if one broke the unlucky TD owner would make a HUGE stink about it on here. Not that the price is unreasonable, it's just more than most TDers pay for their whole cars.
tkelly27 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

» Quick Nav
- Home
- Classifieds
- Timeslips
- Gallery
- Vendors
-- Directory
- Tech Articles
- Donate
Sponsors
remove ads

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1
Credit Expert | Cingular Ringtones | Watch Anime | Advertising | Dan brown


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:11 PM.

Page generated in 0.74399 seconds with 13 queries