TurboDodge.com MarketPlace Shelby Registry Contact Us

Advertisement - Remove these ads today by clicking here.
 

Go Back   TurboDodge.Com - Turbo Dodge forum for Turbo Mopars, Shelbys, Daytona, SRT-4, PT Cruiser, Omni and more! > Turbo Dodge Technical Chat > Engine - Exhaust

Engine - Exhaust Topics about the exhaust system discussed here.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools

Old 02-29-2008, 12:25 PM   #1
3" Exhaust Question  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Detroit area

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 433
Feedback: (2)
i know if you have a fire hose and choke it down to a garden hose it can only flow as good as a garden hose. it can only flow as good as its smallest part. i'm confused about the exhaust systems, with a 3" down pipe and mandrel bent 3" system without a cat and with a high flow muffler would be as good as it gets ( with a muffler) but then i look at the output from the turbo itself, reguardless of the swingvalve size, i think its well under 3" so what am i missing? same as the exhaust manifold side i understand longer tubes is a good thing. but beyond that if you add the size of the ports on the head, and compare it to the size of the turbo inlet it don't seem that much improvement can be made other than longer tubes, am i right? i'm guessing i'm not but i don't understand why.
TURBOVAN is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-29-2008, 01:49 PM   #2
Re: 3" Exhaust Question  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Connecticut

My Ride: 1986 GLHS #126
Engine: stock
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 12.920

Posts: 2,482
Feedback: (0)
there's a lot of thermodynamic and fluid dynamics at play but let's bottom line it for you: dyno testing of replacing a stock 2.25" exhaust system w/ a quality 3" exhaust system show substantial gains in HP and torque at even at low boost levels.
Marcus86GLHS is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-29-2008, 03:42 PM   #3
Re: 3" Exhaust Question  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: maryland

My Ride: 1986 GLHS
Engine: 2.2 Turbo
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 169
Feedback: (0)
Images: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcus86GLHS View Post
there's a lot of thermodynamic and fluid dynamics at play but let's bottom line it for you: dyno testing of replacing a stock 2.25" exhaust system w/ a quality 3" exhaust system show substantial gains in HP and torque at even at low boost levels.

+1
168glhs1986 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-29-2008, 04:40 PM   #4
Re: 3" Exhaust Question  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB.

My Ride: 88 Daytona Shelby Z
Engine: 2.2 TII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,175
Feedback: (0)
Part of the issue is pressure. The bigger exhaust helps create less pressure, there by helping spool the turbo, scavenge the cylinders. If you were to spray water or alky into your down pipe, it would help even more, as the hot gases would reduce in volume reducing pressure even more.
scott_s is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2008, 08:26 PM   #5
Re: 3" Exhaust Question  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Florence

My Ride: 87 Shelby Lancer
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 3
Feedback: (0)
I have a Lancer and I put a 3" swing valve and 3" exhaust on from Turbos Unleashed and it made a big defiance in HP and gas milage. if I keep my foot out of it I can get 34mpg, I was getting around 29mpg before. I had a turbo van with 3" and a stock swing valve and I only got about 22mpg. I would definitely go with 3" over 2.25 the HP difference is enough.
2TL4TT is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2008, 11:50 AM   #6
Re: 3" Exhaust Question  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Vienna, Austria (EUROPE)

My Ride: '92 Daytona Iroc
Engine: 2.2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 522
Feedback: (0)
I've read the most critical part of the exhaust system is right after it leaves the turbo. This is where the gases are hottest and they take up the most volume from heat expansion. Bigger is better and swingvalve size is critical for not only performance but for fuel mileage gains as well. Someone once posted on this forum that there is no benefit to a 3" swingvalve with stock turbos but 2TL4TT's results just disproved that theory. I need to pick up one of those TU 3" swingvalves before they run out again.

Scott, didn't you also see an increase in fuel mileage when you installed your 3" SV?

Andy
Austrian Dodge is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2008, 09:26 PM   #7
Re: 3" Exhaust Question  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Nebraska

My Ride: '87 Daytona Shelby Z
Engine: 2.2l TII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,110
Feedback: (5)
Images: 3
It also depends on how long that restriction is, so even if the exhaust outflows the turbo, its better than matching the turbo and having a restriction all the way down
impuresoul2k3 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2008, 12:08 AM   #8
Re: 3" Exhaust Question  
GTCUL8R
 
Polygon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Utah

My Ride: 1989 LeBaron GTC
Engine: Turbo II 2.2L/135ci
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,527
Feedback: (0)
Alright, to keep a long story short, once the exhaust leaves the manifold it should have all the velocity it needs. It is now your job to give it the least amount of restriction and let inertia go to work. This is done be increasing flow by using larger pipe, a bigger SV, and as few direction changes as possible. Thermal coating the manifold, exhaust housing on the turbo, and the SV will also improve scavenging and help speed up the flow.

Just remember that your turbo is a big restriction on the exhaust. Getting a bigger turbo will also help a lot if you're pushing a lot of air. At one point of modding the stock turbo will be too much of a restriction.
__________________
Clint: 1989 LeBaron GTC Turbo II - 1991 Dodge Stealth R/T TT - 1987 LeBaron Premium Parts Car

My CarDomain Garage.

I am looking for gray interior trim for a J-body (1987-1989) LeBaron coupe hardtop. If you have anything please PM me before throwing it out.
Polygon is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2008, 02:24 AM   #9
Re: 3" Exhaust Question  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: scottsbluff, NE

My Ride: 85 GLH
Engine: 2.5CB
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 745
Feedback: (4)
all i can say, i got one of those 3in SV's from TU today, man, those things put a 2.5 to shame... in size. cant wait to see this thing move.
ZachT is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2008, 10:45 AM   #10
Re: 3" Exhaust Question  
GTCUL8R
 
Polygon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Utah

My Ride: 1989 LeBaron GTC
Engine: Turbo II 2.2L/135ci
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,527
Feedback: (0)
You'll notice quite a difference. Here's a dyno run that TU did to compare the two.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Turbos Unleashed - SV 2.5 vs. 3.jpg (33.0 KB, 65 views)
__________________
Clint: 1989 LeBaron GTC Turbo II - 1991 Dodge Stealth R/T TT - 1987 LeBaron Premium Parts Car

My CarDomain Garage.

I am looking for gray interior trim for a J-body (1987-1989) LeBaron coupe hardtop. If you have anything please PM me before throwing it out.
Polygon is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2008, 02:48 PM   #11
Re: 3" Exhaust Question  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: scottsbluff, NE

My Ride: 85 GLH
Engine: 2.5CB
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 745
Feedback: (4)
ok, i got a question.

i have a TU S70 turbo (.63 ehaust, quick spool) with a 3in SV, hell of an improvement over a stock T2 with a 2.25SV (.48 exh). at the moment i dont have money to run a full 3in ehaust to the bumper, but i have a 2.5 inch on it now with no cat and a muffler. it sounds pretty good. is it worth 25 bucks for that adapter? or should i wait 2-3 weeks and just get the damn exhaust?

also- what all is needed with the L body 3in (TU, $250). is that thing complete from the turbo to the bumper? i know i will need exhaust clamps. ill probably grab a 3in muffler too. but i will use my hangers. do i need a test pipe?
ZachT is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

» Quick Nav
- Home
- Classifieds
- Timeslips
- Gallery
- Vendors
-- Directory
- Tech Articles
- Donate
Sponsors
remove ads

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1
Mortgage Calculator | Mortgages | Loans | Remortgages | Loan


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:50 AM.

Page generated in 0.48659 seconds with 14 queries