TurboDodge.com MarketPlace Shelby Registry Contact Us

Advertisement - Remove these ads today by clicking here.
 

Go Back   TurboDodge.Com - Turbo Dodge forum for Turbo Mopars, Shelbys, Daytona, SRT-4, PT Cruiser, Omni and more! > Turbo Dodge Technical Chat > Engine - Exhaust

Engine - Exhaust Topics about the exhaust system discussed here.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools

Old 10-11-2008, 11:32 PM   #1
Tbi header stage two!!!!!!!!  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: long Island new york

Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 543
Feedback: (0)
Redoing my 8 valve lancer. Looking at my options, decided to make a tbi header that will have the turbo in the same relative location as the stock turbo exhaust manifold. Not all the way to the passengers side(the problem with the current tbi design), No more issues with swing valves. Must use the smaller starter(bosche).
Attached Images
File Type: jpg MVC-009S.JPG (38.1 KB, 318 views)
File Type: jpg MVC-008S.JPG (40.4 KB, 305 views)
File Type: jpg MVC-007S.JPG (40.0 KB, 306 views)
File Type: jpg MVC-006S.JPG (41.0 KB, 300 views)
File Type: jpg MVC-005S.JPG (40.6 KB, 302 views)
turboking is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2008, 11:40 PM   #2
Re: Whoes in ? Tbi header stage two!!!!!!!!  
Boostaholic
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Houghton MI 60" sno so far

My Ride: OMNI/ShelDak/TSi/SL
Engine: 2.2 'GLHS style' TII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.800

Posts: 3,196
Feedback: (36)
wow!
detobias is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2008, 11:41 PM   #3
Re: Whoes in ? Tbi header stage two!!!!!!!!  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: long Island new york

Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 543
Feedback: (0)
more pictures
Attached Images
File Type: jpg MVC-001S.JPG (40.5 KB, 264 views)
File Type: jpg MVC-002S.JPG (41.0 KB, 257 views)
File Type: jpg MVC-004S.JPG (39.1 KB, 258 views)
turboking is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2008, 07:39 AM   #4
Re: Whoes in ? Tbi header stage two!!!!!!!!  
Boostaholic
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Houghton MI 60" sno so far

My Ride: OMNI/ShelDak/TSi/SL
Engine: 2.2 'GLHS style' TII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.800

Posts: 3,196
Feedback: (36)
couldnt u find a BIGGER turbo ??? OMG ...
detobias is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2008, 10:43 AM   #5
Re: Whoes in ? Tbi header stage two!!!!!!!!  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: oshawa, ontario

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 227
Feedback: (0)
Could you show it in place with the factory style swingvalve?
shadow88 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2008, 08:32 PM   #6
Re: Whoes in ? Tbi header stage two!!!!!!!!  
Boostaholic
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chilliwack B.C.

My Ride: 87 Shelby Charger
Engine: 2.2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.624

Posts: 920
Feedback: (4)
Images: 8
I don't think that will clear the firewall on an L body...
boost geek is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2008, 09:02 PM   #7
Re: Whoes in ? Tbi header stage two!!!!!!!!  
Boostaholic
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Winfield, MO

My Ride: 87 Shelby Z
Engine: 88 2.2 T2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 555
Feedback: (9)
A hammer will make anything fit
moparfreak3 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2008, 11:03 PM   #8
Re: Whoes in ? Tbi header stage two!!!!!!!!  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: long Island new york

Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 543
Feedback: (0)
(I don't think that will clear the firewall on an L body...)

Has to, I am using the same tbi manifold as a starting point

(Could you show it in place with the factory style swingvalve?)

Dont have a dead t2 turbo, will look
turboking is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2008, 08:18 PM   #9
Re: Whoes in ? Tbi header stage two!!!!!!!!  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: long Island new york

Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 543
Feedback: (0)
(Could you show it in place with the factory style swingvalve?)

Heres is two pictures with a diago 3 inch down pipe on a mitsu turbo
Attached Images
File Type: jpg MVC-019S.JPG (40.6 KB, 187 views)
File Type: jpg MVC-018S.JPG (41.0 KB, 188 views)
turboking is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2008, 08:39 PM   #10
Re: Whoes in ? Tbi header stage two!!!!!!!!  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: west of st louis

My Ride: 88J 94P 03dime
Engine: 2.2 in all of em
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 723
Feedback: (0)
uh no offense but that looks like shyt. the tbi manifold will flow considerably less air than a turbo manifold. ports are smaller, and those flow dividers are a huge restriction in airflow as well. plus that doesnt look like it will clear ANY firewall. you'll need a hell of a BFH to make room. the ports arent equal length on a tbi manifold , so theres no gain from that either. a ported stocker will perform better than that nasty mess. did you heat the casting in an oven before welding? if not it will crack right where those welds are every time.
nice idea but in reality it is a waste of time.
better off spending money on a tubular stainless hedder, will easily outperform that or a ported stocker. if you've gotta have cast iron id go with a TU cast iron manifold. it has minor issues with fit but those are easily addressed with a die grinder in 20 minutes.
crusty shadow is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2008, 09:41 PM   #11
Re: Whoes in ? Tbi header stage two!!!!!!!!  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: long Island new york

Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 543
Feedback: (0)
Crusty.

No offense ,but have u ever welded these tbi manifolds. If u "DID" u wouldnt make a stupid statement like "did you heat the casting in an oven before welding? if not it will crack right where those welds are every time".

I made over 50 (fm style headers) sold them on ebay , to wholesalers,etc . Never had one come back for a weld failure . The issue was always" MAKING THE SWING VALVE FIT". With this design that is taken care off- look at all that room between the header flange and the power steering pump.

Another stupid statement "that doesnt look like it will clear ANY firewall" If the fm style will fit so will this, starting out with the same tbi header!!!!!

You are right about those flow dividers. I am going to machine those out. Please understand this is the first one , improvements will be made

Last edited by turboking; 10-13-2008 at 10:00 PM. Reason: grammer
turboking is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2008, 11:15 PM   #12
Re: Tbi header stage two!!!!!!!!  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: oshawa, ontario

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 227
Feedback: (0)
Well, you take this any way you like. I've built a tbi header and I'll stick with it due to my personal power increases. I don't see an advantage with your turbo placement and the obvious mods you needed to get to that point.

You mentioned in post #1 that "No more issues with swing valves." yet it's pointing right onto the steering rack. You'll see when it's installed in the car. I've never had a problem with my turbo being "all the way to the passenger side". I have room. Hell, I MADE room.

But so far, I don't see a real improvement over the regular tbi style turbo header. Unless this is going into a RWD car, you have alot still to do.
shadow88 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2008, 12:50 AM   #13
Re: Tbi header stage two!!!!!!!!  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Salt Lake & Seattle

My Ride: 92 Duster
Engine: 3.0
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 12.700

Posts: 7,722
Feedback: (0)
Are you going to put an external wastegate on that hole on the side?


I dont think this project is a good idea but I am all for people trying to use external gates.
Ondonti is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2008, 02:36 AM   #14
Re: Tbi header stage two!!!!!!!!  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Gresham, Oregon

My Ride: '89 plymouth voyager
Engine: 2.2 TII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 16.800

Posts: 1,796
Feedback: (1)
It's really the cooling that's the issue. It's a cyclical loading issue leading to cracking more than an instant failure too. You sound like you know what you're doing, but it's advised to cool the piece down slowly in sand or an oven and to make small welds so the heat input is localized and alowed to cool slowly.

Maybe it's cheaper for you to get TBIs and mod them, but I'd rather make a full on tubular unit. Looks nice, good luck with it.
tkelly27 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2008, 02:40 AM   #15
Re: Whoes in ? Tbi header stage two!!!!!!!!  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: west of st louis

My Ride: 88J 94P 03dime
Engine: 2.2 in all of em
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 723
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by turboking View Post
Crusty.

No offense ,but have u ever welded these tbi manifolds. If u "DID" u wouldnt make a stupid statement like "did you heat the casting in an oven before welding? if not it will crack right where those welds are every time".

I made over 50 (fm style headers) sold them on ebay , to wholesalers,etc . Never had one come back for a weld failure . The issue was always" MAKING THE SWING VALVE FIT". With this design that is taken care off- look at all that room between the header flange and the power steering pump.

Another stupid statement "that doesnt look like it will clear ANY firewall" If the fm style will fit so will this, starting out with the same tbi header!!!!!

You are right about those flow dividers. I am going to machine those out. Please understand this is the first one , improvements will be made
no i have never welded any TBI manifold, nor would i try. i dont see the point of taking a part that was designed for the airflow of an engine that made 100 hp and trying to make it work on an engine that would be capable of 300+. just doesnt make sense. have you tried that in a car yet? you'll have more fit issues than you think. have plenty of room between the pump and swingvalve, but what about the steering rack, firewall etc? rack problem can be addressed with a new downpipe, but that adds significantly to the cost. im sure machining those dividers out wont be free labor either. still have unequal length tubes on the manifold though. ports are smaller too. for all the work that you have to put into it its not cost effective at all. you'd be bucks ahead to start from scratch make a nice tubular hedder that wont suffer from all those problems. after all the work is done how much are you planning on selling those for?
the whole thing makes me think of trying to cram 10 gallons of shyt into a 5 gallon bucket. it can be done with enough equipment, time, engineering and money, but is it really worth it when making a 10 gallon bucket would have been done much more quickly and easily?
work smarter, not harder - Scrooge McDuck
crusty shadow is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

» Quick Nav
- Home
- Classifieds
- Timeslips
- Gallery
- Vendors
-- Directory
- Tech Articles
- Donate
Sponsors
remove ads

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1
Debt Consolidation | Bankruptcy | Debt Consolidation | Actress | Silver Shop


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:46 PM.

Page generated in 0.54287 seconds with 14 queries