Yesterday, 07:26 PM
|
#12
|
  |
|
Re: whats better?
|
|
Boostaholic
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Spokane WA
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
The stage 2 is not the answer to 12s, if 12s if high 12s are what you want. The stage 2 kills power running your engine too rich.
I have an old thread in the 2.4 section on the 2 I got running 12.7s. Both run big FMICs, a big item and short tires. Running a 10:1 AF and drowning the engine with fuel is how many stage 2 cars go slower than stage 1 cars.
My brothers car with slicks and a stock computer and boost control ran 12.7 @ 110 MPH, 1.89 60ft. 22 x 8 x 15" slicks
__________________
Rob Walsh
84 DC Shelby Rampage
86 GLHS 76
87 GLHS 306
89 CSX 187
89 turbo mini
70 R/T SE Challenger
|
|
|