 |
|
  |
 |
07-26-2005, 03:13 AM
|
#1
|
  |
|
Alcohol Injection Instead of Bigger Intercooler
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: May 2003
Location: VENTURA CO.> CALIFORNIA
My Ride: 86 GLHS
Engine: 2.2 Turbo Intercool
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
For months I have been wanting to upgrade my stock intercooler but in the wake of recent rebuilding, that has been low end on my list of priorities.
Though, as far as performance goes, the cold air charge is among highest in making a lot of power with low boost... and from what peaple say, Upgrading the intercooler shows a huge bottle neck on throngs of stock II intercoolers out there  mine included. But I love the way it fits so perfectly stock from the Skunkworks factory...
So I have been thinking about other ways to cool the charge withough doing drastic measures...
I have been thinking of a way to make a home brew alky or methanol injection tank, pressure switch and injector... does anyone have a good home brew using distilled water mix?
I'm not sure about which inkectors are suitable either so bear with me.
Does adding the water/alky lessen the bottleneck of my stock intercooler?
I wonder because soon I'm switching to 3 bar map, and soon boosting around 20 PSI on 91 octane pump gas, with my stock T3 garret turbo that came stock on the GLHS.
I want to make max power on my *near stock set up! But don't want to blow up my motor in the process.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
07-26-2005, 07:26 AM
|
#2
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: www.TurboDodge.com
My Ride: 1991 Daytona Shelby
Engine: 2.5L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.000
|
Using Alky substitution is worth it, if you are willing to use it all the time. The intercooler plays a big part while in street conditions. You can't run alky all the time. Spring for a good intercooler.... will cost you closely to the same costs. If you are getting a calibration, then there is absolutely no need for alky injection because your fuel is good to go.
Frank
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
07-26-2005, 07:52 AM
|
#3
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Rockville, MD
My Ride: '88 Shadow ES 16v
Engine: 2.2 T-III
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 11.610
|
Alky will help you cool, but it won't change the fact that the stock IC's do not flow enough to make good power.
Pat
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
07-26-2005, 08:06 AM
|
#4
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: www.TurboDodge.com
My Ride: 1991 Daytona Shelby
Engine: 2.5L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.000
|
I havent really looked into it much, but the alky injection doesnt cool as much as we lead everyone to believe. Dont get me wrong... alky is very good because of the naturally high octane, the way it burns, and the fact that it doesnt cool some. Detonation is down overal because of it. However it doesnt cool until it gets hot enoughs from either being in the port and/or cylinder... unless you are running a really inefficent turbo like a mitsu. Of course I think that all changes when you start using it as your primary fuel... the evaporation of the alky (which cools the cylinder) is probably greater then say a 15-25% alky mixture that we would run. However I dont dare say anymore, because this is just my personal opinion which I have yet to prove.
Frank
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
07-27-2005, 12:33 PM
|
#6
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: www.TurboDodge.com
My Ride: 1991 Daytona Shelby
Engine: 2.5L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.000
|
I agree that the different mixtures can pull heat out of the air. However its not quite a simple as that... real world mixing is not uniform, so those numbers wont be as good. In addition, the energy transfered from the air into the fuel mixture wont always be enough to truely change the state of the alky and/or water from a suspended liquid mixture to a gasous state. This is where large reductions in air temperature occurs. Yes it happens some, but that is a small factor into the benifits of alky.
The big factor is what you stated in Part 2. The flame front in the combustion chamber is much cooler and in turn keeps the cylinder cooler. This allows for more timing with an intercooler, or to achieve the timing that you would run if you had an intercooler.
My point is that with an intercooler AND a planned future calibration, I would not recommend alky.
Frank
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
07-27-2005, 12:55 PM
|
#8
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: www.TurboDodge.com
My Ride: 1991 Daytona Shelby
Engine: 2.5L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.000
|
I interpretted as just a characteristic of the various mixtures. It has to do with adding mass of a different temperature.
Frank
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
07-29-2005, 04:43 AM
|
#10
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: May 2003
Location: VENTURA CO.> CALIFORNIA
My Ride: 86 GLHS
Engine: 2.2 Turbo Intercool
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
I don't know if our car respond well to water injection, but my friend uses distilled-only water injection to let him run 20+ psi in his STI with red turbo (*he had a green one now he wants 400+ WHP) and he says it work very well. IF alky mix doesn't give me any more power or efficiency, at least for the sake of a safer high boost situation I'm am still thinking about it ( I have plenty of space for a tank by the wiper tank), that is, trying water only. That's why I want to know why kind of results TD guys have had using it and tuning it for our TDs.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
07-29-2005, 04:46 AM
|
#11
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: May 2003
Location: VENTURA CO.> CALIFORNIA
My Ride: 86 GLHS
Engine: 2.2 Turbo Intercool
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
I just found this current thread on a guy using water...
http://www.turbododge.com/forums/sho...463#post750463
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
07-29-2005, 06:50 AM
|
#12
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: www.TurboDodge.com
My Ride: 1991 Daytona Shelby
Engine: 2.5L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.000
|
Alky/Water injection is better then just water. Its just that it becomes very inconvinent to run it all everytime you want to run just a little bit of boost over what you do now. This is why we have suggested an Intercooler.
Frank
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
07-29-2005, 10:01 AM
|
#13
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: South Carolina
My Ride: 1986 Shelby Charger
Engine: 2.2 pseudo TII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
 Quote:
|
Originally Posted by WLKIVETT
Same problem with alky
For 1 pound of air we will burn about 3.0 oz of alky as it takes about 2 times the fuel per HP. That is about 5.3:1 air fuel mix.
Air temp is 300 x 1 = 300deg
Alky temp is 100 x (1/5.3) = 18.75 deg
Mixed air temp = 281.25
|
  |
You can't simply average temperatures in this case. The inherent assumptions that you used while doing this are grossly wrong. You are assuming 2 things...1) No phase change, and 2) identical specific heats.
The whole premise behind injecting alcohol is that you are putting a liquid into a vapor to utelize the latent heat of vaporization...ie the energy associated with the phase change. The latent heat of vaporization of EtOH is MUCH greater than the specific heat of air. (838 kJ/kg vs 1 kJ/kg K) The calculation should be (using 1lb of air and 3 oz of EtOH like you did):
3 oz = 0.154 lb = 0.07 kg EtOH (using 789 kg/m^3 density, and some other conversion factors to get the units right. I'm going to use SI because those were the numbers I found in a google search)
0.07 kg * 838 kJ/kg = 58.66 kJ energy from vaporization
to calculate a final temperature, we use Q = m*Cp*dT, where Q is the heat transfered to the ethanol and Cp is the specific heat of air (above)
58.66 kJ = 0.454 kg*1 kJ/kg K*dT
dT = 129.2 K
300oF = 422 K, so the final temp would be 292ish K, or a little less than 70oF
This is assuming that all the alcohol vaporizes, which probably isn't the case. Also, this is just a kJ for kJ comparison. Eventually you would hit a limit to how low you can get the temp. The final charge temp would be higher than 70oF, but much lower than 281oF. I think the temp of your alcohol would limit this in some regard.
Last edited by The S is Silent; 07-29-2005 at 10:13 AM.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
07-29-2005, 01:14 PM
|
#14
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
My Ride: 87 omni 89 caravan
Engine: turbo 2.5
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
http://www.rbracing-rsr.com/waterinjection.html
its a good read up on the basis behind the whole cooling and controlling detonation effect of water injection
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
07-29-2005, 05:04 PM
|
#15
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Green Bay WI
My Ride: 87 Shelby Z
Engine: 2.2 TII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 15.200
|
Check the Water/Alcohol injection portion of the Engine management section. There is some good info there and people to answer your questions better along with many people who use it.
Benji
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Quick Nav |
|
» Quick Tech |
|
» Market Place |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|