TurboDodge.com MarketPlace Shelby Registry Contact Us

Advertisement - Remove these ads today by clicking here.
 

Go Back   TurboDodge.Com - Turbo Dodge forum for Turbo Mopars, Shelbys, Daytona, SRT-4, PT Cruiser, Omni and more! > Turbo Dodge Technical Chat > Engine - Turbo

Engine - Turbo Modifications and upgrades to maximize your Dodges turbo output.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools

Old 02-08-2006, 09:13 PM   #1
Volvo IC, is there a better idea  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 32
Feedback: (0)
I recently picked up an '88 Lancer ES. Until I get my 2.5 together, I am bringing it up to TII. First, I notice FWD does not list an '88 MP computer. Are they scarce and sepecial or is that just one of those things?

What this post is really about is the intercooler. I have a Volvo unit kicking around in the basement. Ease tempts me. Since it is still "a job", is there a better intercooler to use? I want to keep the A/C. Is the stock intercooler all that bad, if I look through all my plastic bins, I might just find one.

I guess my question is for all considerations, ease, performance, keeping the A/C what is the best unit for an H body?
Faust is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2006, 09:26 PM   #2
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Centralia, WA

My Ride: 86' GLH Omni
Engine: 2.5 Turbo
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 14.000

Posts: 400
Feedback: (0)
Don't know much about H body but i know volvo intercoolers aren't that good, when i was searching for one, everyone told me to stay away from a volvo intercooler...
me_2_3_5 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2006, 09:35 PM   #3
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 32
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by me_2_3_5
Don't know much about H body but i know volvo intercoolers aren't that good, when i was searching for one, everyone told me to stay away from a volvo intercooler...
I kind of suspected that. Maybe I used to know it, and that is why it has been gathering dust all of these years.
Faust is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2006, 09:44 PM   #4
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD

My Ride: 91 Spirit R/T
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 432
Feedback: (0)
yeah sure it will work but theres much better to be found.
I would say its suitable for if your converting from TI to TII status and have nothing else.
FTT843 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2006, 09:54 PM   #5
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 32
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by FTT843
yeah sure it will work but theres much better to be found.
I would say its suitable for if your converting from TI to TII status and have nothing else.
OK, but what is the "much better to be found". I am saving the 2.5 turbo from my rusted out minivan. That will be going in, but after a little warm up.
Faust is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2006, 01:11 PM   #6
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Gresham, Oregon

My Ride: '89 plymouth voyager
Engine: 2.2 TII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 16.800

Posts: 1,796
Feedback: (1)
some people have sucess with the volvos, some don't. I'm running mine @ 14psi and its not leaking, and I could definately feel a difference in power. I think if I go up past 14, I'll probably get a bigger IC, that or weld two volvo cores together
tkelly27 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2006, 01:54 PM   #7
 
Boostaholic
 
Shadow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Aubigny,MB

My Ride: 86 S/C
Engine: 2.2 8V
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 10.990

Posts: 1,033
Feedback: (2)
Images: 6
The big knock on the Volvo I/C's is the plastic tanks and the way they seal to the unit. I've heard that their good too 15psi. Although there was one guy that said he was boosting 18psi and had no problems, can't remember if he did something to stop it from leaking or if he just got lucky.
__________________
Robert Mclellan
11.33 @ 126.1mph MB's fastest SRT-4
11.09 @ 132.38mph Manitoba's fastest FWD 2007
10.99 @ 133.58mph Reached the goal, now I rest
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC ]
Shadow is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2006, 02:02 PM   #8
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Las Vegas

My Ride: 94 Dodge Caravan
Engine: 3.0L V6
Induct: N/A
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,852
Feedback: (0)
From what I've read, the Volvo IC isn't all that effecient. It's said to flow about the same as a stock Chrysler IC unit. The only difference is that the Volvo unit will have much larger frontal area for the heat transfer.

Downside to the Volvo unit is that it has plastic end tanks that are not fused to the core. They're just crimped onto the core. Many have used the IC with good results. But they seem to have a failure rate around 18 psi. The crimps weaken and blows the end tanks at and above those boost pressures.

The Volvo IC is a good inexpensive unit to use if going from TI to TII status without upping the boost much from stock. If you are looking to up the boost, I'd highly suggest an all aluminum unit.

I've personally used the Volvo IC and loved it. But once I upped the boost, problems started to show. Since you have one already, I say go for it. Use it until you damage it or get ready for a great upgrade.


Wink
mwinkle353 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2006, 06:35 PM   #9
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 32
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mwinkle353
From what I've read, the Volvo IC isn't all that effecient. It's said to flow about the same as a stock Chrysler IC unit. The only difference is that the Volvo unit will have much larger frontal area for the heat transfer.

Downside to the Volvo unit is that it has plastic end tanks that are not fused to the core. They're just crimped onto the core. Many have used the IC with good results. But they seem to have a failure rate around 18 psi. The crimps weaken and blows the end tanks at and above those boost pressures.

The Volvo IC is a good inexpensive unit to use if going from TI to TII status without upping the boost much from stock. If you are looking to up the boost, I'd highly suggest an all aluminum unit.

I've personally used the Volvo IC and loved it. But once I upped the boost, problems started to show. Since you have one already, I say go for it. Use it until you damage it or get ready for a great upgrade.


Wink
To start with a note, I have had a little Audi experience. The trick with them is to strap the I/C unit, that tends to hold the ends on. 18 psi isn't really that much when you think about it. My household water is about 80 psi.

Anyway, since I will be transplanting a warm 2.5, I'd rather not do the job twice. Are tehre any "factory" units that are recommended?
Faust is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2006, 06:50 PM   #10
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: oregon

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 248
Feedback: (0)
since all of the +/- for the volvo ic is it worth picking one up for 20$ or a waste?
greendog is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2006, 07:25 PM   #11
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: NE,Ohio

My Ride: GLH-T
Engine: 2.2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,033
Feedback: (0)
Volvo is not bad at all..i would defintaly use it ,specially for $20,Also If you can find a stock IC there not bad eithier... G Donovon used just a stock IC on his 12 second daytona..
87DANCEonYOU is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2006, 07:30 PM   #12
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Las Vegas

My Ride: 94 Dodge Caravan
Engine: 3.0L V6
Induct: N/A
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,852
Feedback: (0)
I guess I'll be strapping mine soon.


I only want 18-22 psi from the shadow.

But that 3 bar cal will have to get done before that happens.
mwinkle353 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2006, 11:14 AM   #13
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Spokane, WA

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,476
Feedback: (0)
ok, instead of speculating and posting me-too type "i read it somewhere" posts, lets look at some actual math:
http://www.turboford.net/cgi-bin/ult...;f=16;t=001373
a few posts down (under the obligatory gus link) is a good look at several popular jy intercoolers. the number to really keep an eye on is "heat rejected", this tells you the capacity of the intercooler. next of course is pressure drop.
xrattiracer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2006, 12:01 PM   #14
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 32
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by xrattiracer
ok, instead of speculating and posting me-too type "i read it somewhere" posts, lets look at some actual math:
http://www.turboford.net/cgi-bin/ult...;f=16;t=001373
a few posts down (under the obligatory gus link) is a good look at several popular jy intercoolers. the number to really keep an eye on is "heat rejected", this tells you the capacity of the intercooler. next of course is pressure drop.
Your point is well taken. However, since all boneyard intercoolers sell for the same price, "why not the best".

For myself, there are a lot of factors to be considered other than small diferences in cooling, flow and pressure drop. I am equally concerned with availability, sturdiness and relative difficulty of isntallation.

I also want my A/C to operate efficiently. This is not a "race car", it is a "high performance" car.

Last edited by Faust; 02-12-2006 at 12:11 PM.
Faust is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2006, 01:05 PM   #15
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD

My Ride: 91 Spirit R/T
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 432
Feedback: (0)
im not sure how much you wana fabricate up front but cant you find some srt-4 ic's around for cheap now?
FTT843 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

» Quick Nav
- Home
- Classifieds
- Timeslips
- Gallery
- Vendors
-- Directory
- Tech Articles
- Donate
Sponsors
remove ads

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1
Power Rangers | Loans | Hotel Portal France, Italy, UK | Credit Card Menu | Free Advertising


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:21 AM.

Page generated in 0.55896 seconds with 13 queries