TurboDodge.com MarketPlace Shelby Registry Contact Us

Advertisement - Remove these ads today by clicking here.
 

Go Back   TurboDodge.Com - Turbo Dodge forum for Turbo Mopars, Shelbys, Daytona, SRT-4, PT Cruiser, Omni and more! > Turbo Dodge Technical Chat > Engine - Turbo

Engine - Turbo Modifications and upgrades to maximize your Dodges turbo output.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools

Old 03-15-2006, 05:19 PM   #1
good turbo combo  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Knoxville, TN

My Ride: CSXT
Engine: 2.5
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,984
Feedback: (0)
I was reading a thread on **************** where the guy was using a T04E 50trim wheel in the stock housing with a stage3 wheel in a .48 housing. He says he is building boost crazy fast on his 2.2... (its an enforcer3 turbo)
Link:
http://www.****************/forums/showthread.php?t=2096

What I am wondering is how that combo would work but with a true T04E housing on a 2.5... not sure if I would use the 50trim or if I would use 46trim. Would I build boost as fast if not faster since its in a 2.5 or would the bigger compressor housing cause more delay. The head is stock and I may or may not have a ported exhaust mani...depends if I can sell my ICs.
I am building street warrior, not a dragstrip destroyer so having quick boost response is priority.

Let me know,

Thanks
juxsa is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2006, 07:09 PM   #2
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Fl

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 263
Feedback: (0)
who needs boost below 3k? if your racing, theres no reason for your tac to be down there.
BrassMonkey is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2006, 07:28 PM   #3
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Knoxville, TN

My Ride: CSXT
Engine: 2.5
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,984
Feedback: (0)
Street use. If its a drag car a .48 would kill you but for a car that is a street warrior boost response would be crucial

Beside, what would you rather have, a car that makes power for 4k rpms or a car that makes power for 2.5k rpms? I would rather have the car with the wider powerband
juxsa is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2006, 07:40 PM   #4
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Fl

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 263
Feedback: (0)
eh, i dont know what im talkin about. when i need boost, i just downshift and let the turd scream to 6500. =)
BrassMonkey is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2006, 07:46 PM   #5
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: anaheim

My Ride: need a TD
Engine: 2.2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 370
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrassMonkey
eh, i dont know what im talkin about. when i need boost, i just downshift and let the turd scream to 6500. =)
:banaride:
krazy4 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2006, 09:27 PM   #6
What about...  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Richmond, VA

My Ride: 85 Charger
Engine: 2.2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 994
Feedback: (0)
On a similar note-

I need serious feedback from those who have had sucess with the 46 trim
stage 1 and/ or 2 ex wheel. I have assumed that for a 2.2 stick w race head,
the 46 trim w/ .63 hot housing, lag should not be too bad. Everyone goes 50 trim, but I don't think that's realistic w stage 2 wheel- for my car that is.
Any usefull feedback/ experience welcome.

(86 body Daytona, 555 tranny)
john1320 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2006, 09:47 PM   #7
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: wyandotte, michigan

My Ride: 90 stang, 86 stang
Engine: T.T521", nitrous351w
Induct: Turbo + Nitrous
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 586
Feedback: (0)
put a two-step on it and it will make boost in neutral.
igotaneed4speed is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2006, 12:38 AM   #8
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Utah

My Ride: 89 Caravan SE turbo
Engine: 2.5L SOHC
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.506

Posts: 514
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by juxsa
Beside, what would you rather have, a car that makes power for 4k rpms or a car that makes power for 2.5k rpms?
If you seriously believe a turbo Dodge that makes full boost at 2000 RPM will still be pulling hard at 6000 RPM, you're newer to the hobby than your post count indicates. Our engines just don't work like that. Look at the Mitsu turbo on a 2.5L, for example. Oh, sure, you'll get some good boost at 2000 RPM... but the power will begin to nosedive around 4000 RPM. Setting up your engine this way won't be doing any favors to your street warrior car (unless your idea of a "street war" is a race from 0-30 MPH).

To answer your question, I'd rather have a turbo Dodge that has a 2500 RPM power band--from 3500-6000 RPM, please. Using a powerband which is only 2000 RPM wide (from 3k to 5k) my 2.5L minivan manages to run 13.5 ETs. Back when I had it set up for lower RPM boost, I went slower. I decided faster was more fun.
TurboMinivan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2006, 05:54 PM   #9
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Knoxville, TN

My Ride: CSXT
Engine: 2.5
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,984
Feedback: (0)
I am not talking full boost.... thats crazy. I am taking about making 1-2 psi at 2k rpms... instead of 3k rpms..... powerband starts out a little lower.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TurboMinivan
If you seriously believe a turbo Dodge that makes full boost at 2000 RPM will still be pulling hard at 6000 RPM, you're newer to the hobby than your post count indicates. Our engines just don't work like that. Look at the Mitsu turbo on a 2.5L, for example. Oh, sure, you'll get some good boost at 2000 RPM... but the power will begin to nosedive around 4000 RPM. Setting up your engine this way won't be doing any favors to your street warrior car (unless your idea of a "street war" is a race from 0-30 MPH).

To answer your question, I'd rather have a turbo Dodge that has a 2500 RPM power band--from 3500-6000 RPM, please. Using a powerband which is only 2000 RPM wide (from 3k to 5k) my 2.5L minivan manages to run 13.5 ETs. Back when I had it set up for lower RPM boost, I went slower. I decided faster was more fun.
juxsa is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2006, 06:30 PM   #10
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Saskatoon, Sask

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,999
Feedback: (0)
the true t4 housing will allow the turbo to spool quicker, same with the fact it's a 2.5
89daytonaTII is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2006, 07:02 PM   #11
 
Boostaholic
 
Shadow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Aubigny,MB

1/4: 11.090

Posts: 990
Feedback: (2)
Images: 6
We trapped 125mph with a 46 trim T04e in it's original housing with a .63 A/R turbine with stock wheel. It spooled like mad, almost too fast! I would never mate a T04e to a .48 no matter what stage it was, just a waste of time and money.
__________________
11.53 & 123.6mph MB's fastest SRT-4
11.09 @ 132.38mph Manitoba's fastest FWD 2007
Shadow is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2006, 07:49 PM   #12
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Knoxville, TN

My Ride: CSXT
Engine: 2.5
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,984
Feedback: (0)
yeah... i figured out that I am going to go with a TO4E with a super50 trim and a .63 not sure if I am going to use stage 1 or stage 2 yet.... I am interested in hearing about 46 trim wheels though
juxsa is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2006, 07:57 PM   #13
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Saskatoon, Sask

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,999
Feedback: (0)
what's there to hear about? It's a little smaller so it'll support a little less hp but spool a little quicker. And is still efficient in 300+hp and high boost applications.
89daytonaTII is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2006, 05:19 AM   #14
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Knoxville, TN

My Ride: CSXT
Engine: 2.5
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,984
Feedback: (0)
im interested in how much quicker they spool, what kinda spool times are people getting listing their setup. I know its a little smaller but I want to know what kind of success people are having. Do they wish they went with a 50 trim wheel?
juxsa is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2006, 08:37 AM   #15
 
Boostaholic
 
Shadow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Aubigny,MB

1/4: 11.090

Posts: 990
Feedback: (2)
Images: 6
Knowing the map of a 50 trim and that it's bigger than a 57 trim (due to the taller comp wheel design) I would use a stage 3 .63 A/R turbine housing to get the full potential of that wheel. If your going to be happy with 350whp stay with the 46 trim and stock turbine .63 A/R. If your going to want 400-450whp go with the 50 trim stage 3.
__________________
11.53 & 123.6mph MB's fastest SRT-4
11.09 @ 132.38mph Manitoba's fastest FWD 2007
Shadow is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

» Quick Nav
- Home
- Classifieds
- Timeslips
- Gallery
- Vendors
-- Directory
- Tech Articles
- Donate
Sponsors
remove ads

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1
Flights | Credit Card | Loans | Internet Advertising | Loans


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:41 AM.
Affiliates: GTcars.ca - DodgeIntrepid.net - AudiForum.ca - Miataturbo.net -