 |
|
  |
 |
05-07-2004, 07:21 PM
|
#16
|
  |
|
Re: Re: Re: Why does everyone say a Zener diode is better for tricking the MAP?
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Milw. WI
My Ride: No slicks Omni
Engine: 2.2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 12.036
|
 Quote:
|
|
Originally posted by glhsken
Ummm not all of them. I've used both, I preferred the zener..
|
  |
Not disputing they will work, but comparing voltage's
http://hometown.aol.com/russjerome/images/tempgaugs.jpg
accross range for drain from Zener (it takes voltage to read).
http://hometown.aol.com/russjerome/images/scanner.jpg
they will read different.
Toggeling a solenoid to split signal between a zener and a G-valve will show a drop in voltage for the zener, the G-valve will be 100% accurate until pressure drop needed. Even though I disable my cut-out in my computers I think a daily driver would be wise to use the G-valve instead of a zener. The zeners parasitic draw under load just add's another tuning issue for me, always comes up at track  Another problem I have had is trying to find a single zener that reads the same as one from same package? Take a 10 pack of 4.7v @ "...." rating diodes and bench test them under load, they will all be a little different.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
05-07-2004, 08:41 PM
|
#17
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Milw. WI
My Ride: No slicks Omni
Engine: 2.2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 12.036
|
sorry, wrong pics.....dont listen to a guy who cant even find his own pics
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
05-07-2004, 09:10 PM
|
#18
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Southgate, KY
My Ride: 1987 Shelby GLHS 189
Engine: 2.2L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 12.510
|
Russ, I hear you 100% as far as accuracy goes, but consider who will be running them. Most people don't pay THAT much attention to the car and the cut-out's need "tuning"... for the average "Joe" fire and forget... zener. Tune the car in once and it's done.
of course.. 3 bar beats them all
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
05-08-2004, 12:02 AM
|
#20
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Upland, CA
My Ride: 2000 GMC Sierra
Engine: 5.3L V8
Induct: N/A
1/4: 0.000
|
^ I agree with him 100%!
Yes a 3 bar is by far the most superior way of doing things.
I think it's probably more a matter of preference. Some people feel more comfortable soldering and working with electronics; others would rather work at it mechanically. Each way has it's benefits and disadvantages; but I think both work equally well.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
05-08-2004, 07:14 AM
|
#21
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Des Plaines, IL
1/4: 0.000
|
I sell the adjustable Zeners so I am a bit biased.
I feel that a Zener diode is not better then an adjustable grainger valve for exactly the reasons russ was stating about the draw on the MAP line. Also like everyone else was saying the diodes are not very accurate unless you are dropping the cash on MIL spec items and that is another story.
Argghhh that thing spoolboy makes drives me insane, its great and all in that it works, but you are dragging the entire MAP voltage down, in a way scaling the MAP voltage with that thing. It is not a clean cut at a certain voltage.
I am not trying to sell anything here but the adjustable diode that I sell and I believe that Dave St, Louis's unit is built the similiar to mine is the best way to go. Very low power loss from the circuit, in the case of my unit less then .01 W, adjustable to within a tenth of a volt , not temp dependent, and has absolutely no voltage leakage.
Those are my two cents.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
05-10-2004, 10:19 AM
|
#22
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: St. Louis, Missouri, U.S.A
1/4: 0.000
|
 Quote:
|
|
Originally posted by MM Racing
I sell the adjustable Zeners so I am a bit biased.
I feel that a Zener diode is not better then an adjustable grainger valve for exactly the reasons russ was stating about the draw on the MAP line. Also like everyone else was saying the diodes are not very accurate unless you are dropping the cash on MIL spec items and that is another story.
Argghhh that thing spoolboy makes drives me insane, its great and all in that it works, but you are dragging the entire MAP voltage down, in a way scaling the MAP voltage with that thing. It is not a clean cut at a certain voltage.
I am not trying to sell anything here but the adjustable diode that I sell and I believe that Dave St, Louis's unit is built the similiar to mine is the best way to go. Very low power loss from the circuit, in the case of my unit less then .01 W, adjustable to within a tenth of a volt , not temp dependent, and has absolutely no voltage leakage.
Those are my two cents.
|
  |
It doesn't, although you can argue with me again about it as I am not an electronics expert, although the guy who designed the circuit is an electronics engineer in aviation. All I know is that previous to install, 12psi was X voltage, after install, 12psi is still X voltage. So it does NOT drag the voltage down.
Dennis
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
05-10-2004, 10:28 AM
|
#23
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Tampa Bay, FL USA
My Ride: 1991 Spirit R/T
Engine: 2.2L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
 Quote:
|
|
Originally posted by spoolboy
It doesn't, although you can argue with me again about it as I am not an electronics expert, although the guy who designed the circuit is an electronics engineer in aviation. All I know is that previous to install, 12psi was X voltage, after install, 12psi is still X voltage. So it does NOT drag the voltage down.
Dennis
|
  |
I will also second what Dennis is saying. I made an adjustable zener using the instructions on his page and I didnt see any type of voltage drop due to the addition of the diode to the MAP circuit and I have datalogged the car both ways. If there is a voltage drop, it must be very very small as my scanner doesnt see it. Maybe its only a few hundredths of a volt?
In my mind, the adjustable zener is an excellent solution. If you have access to an air compressor, you can dial the zener in nearly perfectly before you even drive the car.
Of course, a perfectly done 3 bar cal is the ultimate way to go, but thats not an option for everyone.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
05-11-2004, 04:44 AM
|
#25
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Beavercreek OH (Dayton Area)
My Ride: 86 Turbo z,73 duster
Engine: 2.2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
I dont want to hijack this thread but i see eveybody saying that 3 bar setups are the way to go. So I tryed to reasearch it at thedodgegarage.com but didnt have much luck. So my question is what cars will it work on and how much would it cost? Hopefully somebody culd explain this a little for me and everybody else that might be confused.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
05-11-2004, 12:25 PM
|
#26
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Abbotsford, BC, Canada
My Ride: 1989 Turbo Caravan
Engine: 2.5L 8V Sohc
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.400
|
 Quote:
|
|
Originally posted by stampederunner
I dont want to hijack this thread but i see eveybody saying that 3 bar setups are the way to go. So I tryed to reasearch it at thedodgegarage.com but didnt have much luck. So my question is what cars will it work on and how much would it cost? Hopefully somebody culd explain this a little for me and everybody else that might be confused.
|
  |
I was going to say the same thing, thanks! I have lots of 3 bar maps.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
05-12-2004, 06:55 PM
|
#28
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Beavercreek OH (Dayton Area)
My Ride: 86 Turbo z,73 duster
Engine: 2.2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
so can ANY computer be programed for a 3-bar? I have been told u need a 87 and up computer is this true?
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Quick Nav |
|
» Quick Tech |
|
» Market Place |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|