 |
|
  |
 |
10-17-2004, 04:55 PM
|
#2
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: PA
My Ride: 88 Shadow
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
18 Psi
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
10-17-2004, 05:57 PM
|
#3
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Brampton, Ontario, Canada
My Ride: 1991 Daytona Shelby
Engine: SOHC 2.5L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
It also depends on IC choice. . .the mitsu heats things up in a hurry!
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
10-17-2004, 09:12 PM
|
#4
|
  |
|
|
|
Boostaholic
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Garfield
My Ride: 90 daytona shelby
Engine: 2.2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
i thought it was 15 psi with a intercooler
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
10-17-2004, 09:29 PM
|
#5
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: PA
My Ride: 88 Shadow
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
 Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mr Overkill
i thought it was 15 psi with a intercooler
|
  |
15 PSI is usually the max you can run on the stock fuel system. The turbo becomes inefficient or runs out of it's map at around 17-18 PSI or so. People have sqeaked 20 out of them but that severly shortens the life of the turbo and isn't really great for performance anyway. Actually, if you want to look at it this way, the mitsu is not a good turbo for our cars at any level of boost. The turbine housing is severly restrictive and the more boost you run the more that has to flow through the turbine. The backpressure must be a lot at high boost levels. I've run 14 PSI on a mitsu myself, but on a 2.2 not a 2.5. I liked it, but for performance the turbine is just plain too restrictive. The mitsu would be ideally suited on 1.5-1.6 liter engine.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
10-18-2004, 12:32 PM
|
#6
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Utah
My Ride: 89 Acclaim LE turbo
Engine: 2.5L SOHC
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
 Quote:
|
Originally Posted by moparzrule
Actually, if you want to look at it this way, the mitsu is not a good turbo for our cars at any level of boost. The turbine housing is severly restrictive and the more boost you run the more that has to flow through the turbine.
|
  |
This is exactly correct. The Mitsu's turbine is so small that it will cost you far more horsepower than a drop in compressor efficiency ever could. In fact, that statement is so important I'm going to say it again:
The Mitsu's turbine is so small that it will cost you far more horsepower than a drop in compressor efficiency ever could.
The little-understood-but-outrageously-significant shortcoming of the Mitsu turbo is its horribly undersized turbine. Even if you were to put a substantially larger compressor wheel on the Mitsu (say, a Super60 for example) the tiny turbine would continue to choke your horsepower and largely negate the benefit you are supposed to get from a better compressor.
Compressor efficiency is not the Mitsu's primary problem, so don't worry about it. Just upgrade it!
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
10-18-2004, 01:10 PM
|
#7
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Southgate, KY
My Ride: 1987 Shelby GLHS 189
Engine: 2.2L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 12.510
|
So Dempsey, bottom line answer to the question:
 Quote:
|
|
when does mitsu turbo become inefficient?
|
  |
The minute you install it
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
10-18-2004, 01:16 PM
|
#8
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Abbotsford, BC, Canada
My Ride: 1989 Turbo Caravan
Engine: 2.5L 8V Sohc
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.400
|
Too funny.
Do I see another sticky?
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
10-18-2004, 02:00 PM
|
#10
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Southgate, KY
My Ride: 1987 Shelby GLHS 189
Engine: 2.2L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 12.510
|
You really do NOT want to install those components with a stock I/c and turbo. You will flood the poor car with fuel.
3 bar set-ups should ONLY be used with LARGER than GARRET stock turbo's and LARGER I/c's.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
10-18-2004, 02:10 PM
|
#12
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Southgate, KY
My Ride: 1987 Shelby GLHS 189
Engine: 2.2L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 12.510
|
 Quote:
|
|
ok guys thanks,Im upgradeding my fuel right now,3bar mpa,+40's and a stage 5 ECU courtisey of csx#10,so I was curious what I can push,and Ill have a stock rad/ic combo for now.
|
  |
You are pardoned, And that's not what you said...
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
11-06-2004, 10:21 AM
|
#13
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Columbus Grove, Ohio
My Ride: 1989 LeBaron GTC
Engine: 2.2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 12.500
|
We ran a mitsu at 21PSI with a stock intercooler and ran 12.704 @ 109mph
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
11-06-2004, 11:45 AM
|
#14
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: PA
My Ride: 88 Shadow
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
In an L body?
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Quick Nav |
|
» Quick Tech |
|
» Market Place |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|