 |
|
  |
 |
01-12-2005, 03:17 PM
|
#2
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: www.TurboDodge.com
My Ride: 1986 Plymouth Horizo
Engine: 2.2 Turbo
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 11.705
|
Nothing spools better than a stock turbo. Open up the exhaust, that will reduce lag.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
01-14-2005, 02:05 AM
|
#3
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Wichita, Kansas
My Ride: 2004 SRT4
Engine: 2.4
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.680
|
Mike is 100% right on. I dont think a 3" exhaust will fit under an omni, but I am positive that a 2 1/2" will. If you delete the cat, use a high flow muffler, I assure you, it will spool instantly the second you nail the throttle.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
01-14-2005, 02:11 AM
|
#4
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Saskatoon, Sask
1/4: 0.000
|
 Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Andre' Parker
Mike is 100% right on. I dont think a 3" exhaust will fit under an omni, but I am positive that a 2 1/2" will. If you delete the cat, use a high flow muffler, I assure you, it will spool instantly the second you nail the throttle.
|
  |
of course a 3" fit's under an L-body.
Yeah you won't be worried about lag with a stock turbo and an open exhaust
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
01-14-2005, 06:11 PM
|
#5
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Wichita, Kansas
My Ride: 2004 SRT4
Engine: 2.4
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.680
|
I have heard it has issues going over the rear axle. I know it fits the Daytona, I have it on mine. A omni with a big valve head, hybrid turbo would be a blast to drive.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
01-14-2005, 10:54 PM
|
#8
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Jacksonville, Fl
My Ride: '88 Shelby Z TII
Engine: 2.2 TII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 14.284
|
I dunno...a dual BB GT series turbo seems like it would spool VERY quickly....*goes off drooling*
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
01-15-2005, 05:24 AM
|
#9
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Wichita, Kansas
My Ride: 2004 SRT4
Engine: 2.4
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.680
|
Hell, these cars already make too much torque as it stands. Wait until you try the open exhaust. Your gonna spin like crazy. You should be able to spin from a roll in 1st gear
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
01-15-2005, 06:32 AM
|
#10
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: www.TurboDodge.com
My Ride: 1991 Daytona Shelby
Engine: 2.5L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.000
|
 Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Reaper1
I dunno...a dual BB GT series turbo seems like it would spool VERY quickly....*goes off drooling*
|
  |
I would have to disagree with that statement, on one account. The turbos that would offer the low lag, are too small overall, and would starve at higher boost (22+ psi) and would starve at higher RPMS. Upgrade to a larger turbo, and you still almost have the same lag. The only turbo that seems like it could do the job is the GT3071R, however it is untested on our cars. The GT30R is a drag only doesnt have much better lag.
The wheels are way more efficent then the old ones. If you could get a custom unit with just a GT style wheel, you would have a decent turbo.
Frank
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
01-15-2005, 09:41 AM
|
#11
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Southgate, KY
My Ride: 1987 Shelby GLHS 189
Engine: 2.2L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 12.510
|
 Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dan Culkin
Note: A D-valve setup is not very good if you already have wheelspin issues 
|
  |
LOL... THAT'S the TRUTH!!! You will get to a point where you REALLY REALLY want a little lag. (however instant tirespin at 40-50mph (or more) can be fun)
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
01-15-2005, 12:57 PM
|
#12
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Spokane, Wa
My Ride: 85 GLHT, 87 ShelbyZ
Engine: 2.2 T2 and 2.5 T2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.882
|
 Quote:
|
Originally Posted by fkatzenb
I would have to disagree with that statement, on one account. The turbos that would offer the low lag, are too small overall, and would starve at higher boost (22+ psi) and would starve at higher RPMS. Upgrade to a larger turbo, and you still almost have the same lag. The only turbo that seems like it could do the job is the GT3071R, however it is untested on our cars. The GT30R is a drag only doesnt have much better lag.
The wheels are way more efficent then the old ones. If you could get a custom unit with just a GT style wheel, you would have a decent turbo.
Frank
|
  |
What makes the GT30R a drag only turbo? Why is the GT3071F better? I've been looking at both these turbos for my cars.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
01-15-2005, 01:05 PM
|
#13
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: www.TurboDodge.com
My Ride: 1991 Daytona Shelby
Engine: 2.5L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.000
|
The GT30R is a laggy, but when it comes on, it comes on hard. The GT3071R is a similar turbo, however runs a smaller wheel and a different turbine. The turbine on the GT3071R is smaller and is internally wastegated.
I would beware on the Gt3071R because of mating to our flanges. Plus I think ATP is made up from a bunch of idiots. As for my comment about the GT30R being drag race only is just my feelings on it. I think they are too small for a 8v 2.2 and almost for a 8v 2.5L. Per some peoples thinking, you will be hard pressed to make 500chp. If you do a search, there is someone with a Daytona 2.2 that is running the GT30R, so you may want to contact him and Chris Wright at TU.
Frank
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
01-15-2005, 03:24 PM
|
#14
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Jacksonville, Fl
My Ride: '88 Shelby Z TII
Engine: 2.2 TII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 14.284
|
I talked with Chris at Carlisle when these turbos first came on the market. I can tell you that when I do my Über motor it will have a DBB GT turbo on it. There are a lot of combos that can be achieved with those turbo's. Chris and I both stand on the same gorund as far as seeing bennefits with them...in a drag race situation with an automatic tranny, there is going to be virtually NO difference, but for a road race or autocross car there will be a significant difference. I know he can shed more light on this(plus I've been up for 32 hours straight now), but IMHO the GT turbos are money well spent....
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
01-20-2005, 10:33 PM
|
#15
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: so. pittsburg tenn.
My Ride: 86 omni glh
Engine: 89 T-2,2.2L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 11.906
|
3" exhaust will go over rear axle,all i needing to do ,i was cut off about an inch & half of the little brace on top of axle!!, fix great.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Quick Nav |
|
» Quick Tech |
|
» Market Place |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|