TurboDodge.com MarketPlace Shelby Registry Contact Us

Advertisement - Remove these ads today by clicking here.
 

Go Back   TurboDodge.Com - Turbo Dodge forum for Turbo Mopars, Shelbys, Daytona, SRT-4, PT Cruiser, Omni and more! > Turbo Dodge Technical Chat > Engine - Turbo

Engine - Turbo Modifications and upgrades to maximize your Dodges turbo output.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools

Old 03-01-2005, 07:08 AM   #1
MaxWHP with 93octane & stock head?  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ft.Bliss,TX (from IN)

My Ride: 89 Lebaron GTC
Engine: 2.2L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 189
Feedback: (4)
What turbo would I need on a 2.2 and 2.5 to achieve Max WHP with 93oct gas on a stock 782 head? Assume spearco intercooler, 2.5" full exhaust, 3 bar calibration, 5 speed transmission. I'm guessing 220WHP with a 2.5/Super60 and 250WHP with a 2.2/Super60. You guys know any good setup combos? Dyno plots would help too!!
UltimateBaron is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2005, 10:37 PM   #2
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Ravenna, Ohio

My Ride: 89 Spirit ES
Engine: 2.5 STD TII 20psi
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.726

Posts: 2,311
Feedback: (0)
Garret or a Super 60.
Dave is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2005, 10:50 PM   #3
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ft.Bliss,TX (from IN)

My Ride: 89 Lebaron GTC
Engine: 2.2L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 189
Feedback: (4)
No hybrid? Must I port the head to use a hybrid or will I suffer major lag? I want to use a 50trim/stage III but do headwork down the road with a rebuild. In the meantime, would the my 2.5/stock head/5 speed vehicle suffer due to the head being a major restriction?
UltimateBaron is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2005, 01:58 AM   #4
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Charleston, WV

My Ride: '88 Sundance
Engine: '89 2.5 TI
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 735
Feedback: (0)
FWIW, Alcohol injection has really upped the horsepower that our engines can make on pump gas. With proper tuning, the right turbo, a good flowing head, intercooler and exhaust, running alky for detonation control and extra fueling I'd bet a person could get upwards of 400 WHP on 93 octane. This is just a wild guess on my part though.
Tony
tonyz2897 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2005, 01:29 AM   #5
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Wichita, Kansas

My Ride: 2004 SRT4
Engine: 2.4
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.680

Posts: 1,165
Feedback: (-1)
You can EASILY make 220 whp with the stock Tll turbo. you can make up to roughly 240-250hp with the stock turbo. You can make up to 300hp with the S60. A ported head is a worth while investment. Providing it was done right. You'll make more power per psi of boost. Even a mild port with stock valves will help alot. If your just wanting to make 220 whp, I myself would use the stock Tll turbo, get a full 3" exhaust. The best intercooler you can afford and get a cal set up for 16-18psi set to run +20 injectors and you should easily be there. Hell, you should be close to 200 with a stone stock set up and a good exhaust without a cat.
Andre Parker is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2005, 12:28 AM   #6
 
Boostaholic
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Mesa, AZ

My Ride: 99 Cummins
Engine: 5.9
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 3,094
Feedback: (4)
Images: 6
i have a 2.5 and i dynod at 192, running very lean, at 14 psi on a stock t2 turbo and volvo ic. stock 782/swirl head.

220 is probably achievable at the same psi, just getting the fuel a bit closer to where it should be..

You wont want to stop there though.
Timmay2 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2005, 10:01 AM   #7
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Columbus, OH

Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 2,441
Feedback: (3)
you may suffer lag with the stg 3 wheel, unless the head flows really well.
with a stock head you will need a press. making turbo compared to a flowing turbo.
330 hp has been done on a stock head i believe, though i think they were using race fuel.
mo' parts is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2005, 11:54 AM   #8
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MN

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 3,461
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by adam89shlbydayt
you may suffer lag with the stg 3 wheel, unless the head flows really well.
with a stock head you will need a press. making turbo compared to a flowing turbo.
330 hp has been done on a stock head i believe, though i think they were using race fuel.
You are correct.
I made 337 whp with my 2.2 with a stock long block.
I was using race gas because of the safety factor.
I was using a T3/T4 50 Trim, .63 Exhaust, Stage 3

I would guess you could make about 300 whp with an untouched head.
Just be sure you have the proper cooling.
DakotaKid is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2005, 11:58 AM   #9
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Southgate, KY

My Ride: 1987 Shelby GLHS 189
Engine: 2.2L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 12.510

Posts: 5,234
Feedback: (0)
Made 290 with pump gas on a stock head and 22 psi. Car was not tuned well. 1st try with the calibration. Needed lots of work. t3/4 50 with stage II.

Stock turbo I managed over 250whp on pump gas (stock head) at 18psi. Of course that was a 2.2. The 2.5 will make more torque than a 2.2, but I've NEVER seen one make more hp
glhsken is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2005, 01:30 PM   #10
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Columbus, OH

Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 2,441
Feedback: (3)
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrboVan
You are correct.
I made 337 whp with my 2.2 with a stock long block.
I was using race gas because of the safety factor.
I was using a T3/T4 50 Trim, .63 Exhaust, Stage 3

I would guess you could make about 300 whp with an untouched head.
Just be sure you have the proper cooling.
the saftey factor was mostly for the stock mahles, wasnt it?
was this on a auto or manual? curious about the stage 3 wheel lag.(with a stock head) thanks
mo' parts is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2005, 01:50 PM   #11
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MN

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 3,461
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by adam89shlbydayt
the saftey factor was mostly for the stock mahles, wasnt it?
was this on a auto or manual? curious about the stage 3 wheel lag.(with a stock head) thanks
Yes, because I was running the cast pistons.
Automatic.
Lag was not really an issue once I got it sorted out.
It was fun to drive on the street like that.
I do have a video of the lag time somewhere.

-Bryan
DakotaKid is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2005, 09:26 PM   #12
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: PA

My Ride: 88 Shadow
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 4,673
Feedback: (7)
I'm shooting for 300 WHP on 93 at 22 PSI, only I have a stage 1 G head so not only does it flow better it lowers compression to run more boost/more advance on a given octane. Paul from TU said at 22 PSI with a 2.2 G head he can have a no knock retard cal for me.
A ported head is a BIG time plus, I finally sorted things out today and got my car running good on a stock ECU for now. At 13 PSI (and running WAY rich) my car is faster than is was with 21 PSI (at a perfect tune, 1500 EGT's) on a stock swirl head. I also switched to the .63 turbine and my turbo spools FASTER than it did before with the .48 due to the ported head. I blew an IC hose tonight, when I went to fix it (i left the car running) I got air blowing at me at an idle with a super 70 turbo LOL
moparzrule is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

» Quick Nav
- Home
- Classifieds
- Timeslips
- Gallery
- Vendors
-- Directory
- Tech Articles
- Donate
Sponsors
remove ads

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1
Car Credit | Loans | Ringtones | Car Parts and Accessories | Charity


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:54 AM.

Page generated in 0.40530 seconds with 13 queries