TurboDodge.com MarketPlace Shelby Registry Contact Us

Advertisement - Remove these ads today by clicking here.
 

Go Back   TurboDodge.Com - Turbo Dodge forum for Turbo Mopars, Shelbys, Daytona, SRT-4, PT Cruiser, Omni and more! > Turbo Dodge Technical Chat > Engine - Turbo

Engine - Turbo Modifications and upgrades to maximize your Dodges turbo output.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools

Old 05-17-2005, 01:02 PM   #1
Spearco overkill?  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2005

My Ride: 1985 Dodge Charger
Engine: 2.2L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 238
Feedback: (0)
I've been giving thought on buying a spearco intercooler from turbos unleashed but I just looked at turbonetics website and it says it can cool up to 760 horespower. So it seems a little bit of overkill for anyone here without a drag car. What do you guys think? My goal is to run 20-25psi by the end summer and maybe one day run 30psi. Also how much boost can a stock garrnet take?
twitch27 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2005, 01:06 PM   #2
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Memphis, TN

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 494
Feedback: (0)
Not "cool", it can flow up to 760hp and still retain it's efficiency.

If you can afford it, I say go for the large Spearco FMIC. The more boost you plan to run, the better off it'll be.

As far as a "stock Garrett", I believe it has been run as high as 25psi, but it is FAR from efficient in that range. You'll go faster and/or make more power with less boost and a better turbo.
Casper is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2005, 01:18 PM   #3
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Ravenna, Ohio

My Ride: 89 Spirit ES
Engine: 2.5 STD TII 20psi
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.726

Posts: 2,311
Feedback: (0)
Donovan ran his up to 28psi...the amount of heat expansion would be incredible though. Id suggest going hybrid.
Dave is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2005, 01:26 PM   #4
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: www.TurboDodge.com

My Ride: 1991 Daytona Shelby
Engine: 2.5L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.000

Posts: 2,857
Feedback: (0)
Spearco is worth every penny. They flow and they cool. The cooling part is huge. It allows for stable boost, stable performance, and stable advancement of timing. You will see some pressure change from moving to one as the air is cooler. I would go with 2.5" tubing, etc. It is pretty optimal for tube pressure drops/velocities/cost.


Frank
Frank is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2005, 01:31 PM   #5
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: www.TurboDodge.com

My Ride: 1991 Daytona Shelby
Engine: 2.5L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.000

Posts: 2,857
Feedback: (0)
In addition, you will probably get great end tanks on the TU unit. You can ruin a Spearco's potential with badly designed end tanks... like the one of the V6 turbo shadow. Which I think I might sell and get a unit from TU.


Frank
Frank is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2005, 02:45 PM   #6
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Athens, GA

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 851
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank
like the one of the V6 turbo shadow. Which I think I might sell and get a unit from TU. Frank
I wouldn't quote that in the "For Sale" ad if I were you.
ludwig340 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2005, 04:19 PM   #7
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: www.TurboDodge.com

My Ride: 1991 Daytona Shelby
Engine: 2.5L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.000

Posts: 2,857
Feedback: (0)
Lmao
Frank is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2005, 04:28 PM   #8
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Chicago, IL

My Ride: 1987 Shelby CSX #694
Engine: 1987 2.2L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 14.737

Posts: 1,950
Feedback: (0)
Are we talking about the 1080? I have one that I plan to use on my Daytona. It is smaller than I expected. The core is not that much larger (frontal area) than the stocker. It just runs the tubes 90 degrees from the stocker so you dont have flow problems. I'm sure it will be awesome, but it seems like it would have a tendency to heat soak easily in high-boost applications. Any thoughts on this?
minimopar is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

» Quick Nav
- Home
- Classifieds
- Timeslips
- Gallery
- Vendors
-- Directory
- Tech Articles
- Donate
Sponsors
remove ads

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1
Online Advertising | Loans | Myspace Proxy | Ringtones | Mortgages


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:59 AM.

Page generated in 0.34124 seconds with 13 queries