 |
|
  |
 |
07-31-2008, 06:21 AM
|
#31
|
  |
|
Re: What happened here
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: PA
My Ride: 88 Shadow
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
You re-used the headgasket last time? Mopar gaskets are once and done gaskets, not meant to be re-used.
Holy crap 1000 CC's!!! No real need for injectors that big on any 8V. +40's which are like 550 cc's can handle over 400 WHP. After that people usually upgrade to the 72PPH injectors which are like 800cc's, and no one has topped them out on an 8V.
Scroll down to the Siemens (Deka) injectors-
racetronix - index
It's a common block right? I did not see any major scoring in the cylinders that .020'' wouldn't clean up no problem.
Perhaps a suggestion for you while you have it at the machine shop. Get some main studs and have the shop align hone the caps. A lot better strength for the bottom end.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
07-31-2008, 01:50 PM
|
#32
|
  |
|
Re: What happened here
|
|
Boostaholic
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Wonderland
My Ride: Magnum
Engine: 2.5 TII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
 Quote:
|
Originally Posted by moparzrule
You re-used the headgasket last time? Mopar gaskets are once and done gaskets, not meant to be re-used.
Holy crap 1000 CC's!!! No real need for injectors that big on any 8V. +40's which are like 550 cc's can handle over 400 WHP. After that people usually upgrade to the 72PPH injectors which are like 800cc's, and no one has topped them out on an 8V.
Scroll down to the Siemens (Deka) injectors-
racetronix - index
It's a common block right? I did not see any major scoring in the cylinders that .020'' wouldn't clean up no problem.
Perhaps a suggestion for you while you have it at the machine shop. Get some main studs and have the shop align hone the caps. A lot better strength for the bottom end.
|
  |
Yea I re-used the headgasket, since I suspected that something was wrong and I would be changing the gasket anyway.
Maybe the 1000cc injectors are too big, but all the big ones are in the same price, 755cc, 800cc and 1000cc are 355dls, so If I can choose anyone I will go bigger
Yeah its common block thanks for your suggestions !
Do you have more info ?
I wish to prevent heat and detonation no matter what !
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
07-31-2008, 09:15 PM
|
#34
|
  |
|
Re: What happened here
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: PA
My Ride: 88 Shadow
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
The type of damage to the piston shows a lean condition.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
07-31-2008, 10:37 PM
|
#35
|
  |
|
Re: What happened here
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Waco Tx
My Ride: 1991 dodge daytona
Engine: 2.5 t1
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
either the cylinder walls were honed wrong or the block is warped
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
08-01-2008, 06:20 AM
|
#36
|
  |
|
Re: What happened here
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: PA
My Ride: 88 Shadow
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
If that were true there would be deep gouges in the bore.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
08-01-2008, 07:05 AM
|
#37
|
  |
|
Re: What happened here
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: PA
My Ride: 88 Shadow
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
Not really strange that the number 4 did it, cuz he's making a lot of power with no number 4 cooling mod so that cylinder will run the hottest.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
08-01-2008, 10:15 AM
|
#38
|
  |
|
Re: What happened here
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: South Carolina
My Ride: 85 glh
Engine: 2.2
1/4: 0.000
|
Looks like straight detonation to me.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
08-01-2008, 10:57 AM
|
#39
|
  |
|
Re: What happened here
|
|
Boostaholic
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Wonderland
My Ride: Magnum
Engine: 2.5 TII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
Well Im most on detonation side... the AFR was 10:1 on a LC1 and all the pistons looks pretty similar.
I was running toluene and xylene, and according to my notes I had 100octane... but I guess I will need truly race gas.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
08-01-2008, 11:05 AM
|
#40
|
  |
|
Re: What happened here
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: levittown
My Ride: 88 c1500 Lowrider
Engine: 305
Induct: N/A
1/4: 0.000
|
I noticed a nice spike in your MS datalog , are you using the stock style Peak & hold Injectors ?
you may want to look into Knocksense for the MS
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
08-01-2008, 12:55 PM
|
#41
|
  |
|
Re: What happened here
|
|
Boostaholic
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Wonderland
My Ride: Magnum
Engine: 2.5 TII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
Yeah that spike killed my piston for sure !! eventhough I was having litle detonations... Actually I have to activate the knocksensor in the MS, bacause its disabled and I dont know how to connect it.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
08-01-2008, 04:10 PM
|
#42
|
  |
|
Re: What happened here
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: levittown
My Ride: 88 c1500 Lowrider
Engine: 305
Induct: N/A
1/4: 0.000
|
I'm using a GM ESC Module and gm Knock sensor from a Early gm Feedback CCC Carb motor , your spike is probably attributed to the low impedence Injectors causing a ripple in the B+ Plane inside the MS . Remember it only has 1 12vB+ input into the box , you may have to add another one to keep that spike from messing with the logic level B+
It has to do with the way the injector drivers limit current to keep the Injs open and the colapsing field inside the inj backfeeding thru the 12v+ plane. either move to High Impedence Injs to get rid of the spike or do a search on MSEFI on Map spikes.
You'll notice that the spike happens in your timing/map/Pw and maybe a few other places, you MS may also be sensitive to accel enrichment, My problem was every time it spiked it would dump more fuel , and if I made the lag filters larger it wouldn't sense Throttle input very well.
My .02 cents.
BTW I've built 3 of these things.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
08-01-2008, 05:02 PM
|
#43
|
  |
|
Re: What happened here
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Minnesota
My Ride: 1992 Dodge Daytona
Engine: 2.5l I-4 super 60
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
Question about the spark angle...
It undoubtedly spiked big time, but that seems to be at closed throttle--possibly during a shift so that should be okay? However, I see the max. value as being 57 (degrees?) and a minimum of 21. Does the base ignition timing of 12 degrees have to be added on top of those figures? That would be a minimum of 33 degrees of advance. Even 21 degrees seems a bit much to me for 20 PSI of boost or am I incorrect?
Maybe I'm not looking at the log correctly...?
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
08-01-2008, 05:05 PM
|
#44
|
  |
|
Re: What happened here
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Minnesota
My Ride: 1992 Dodge Daytona
Engine: 2.5l I-4 super 60
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
Oh, and I do not know much more about reverse flow cooling systems. For all I know the casting has to be different to prevent air pockets or something.
In regards to the voltage spikes caused by the injectors, that can also be remedied by putting diodes in parallel with the injectors, right? When the field collapses, the resulting reverse voltage spike should get shorted out by the diode.??
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
08-01-2008, 05:05 PM
|
#45
|
  |
|
Re: What happened here
|
|
Boostaholic
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Wonderland
My Ride: Magnum
Engine: 2.5 TII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
Whoaa !! ... thanks man, I knew it, something its wrong but I wasnt sure what was the problem or what caused that spike, actually Im about to buy a set of stage 2 injectors, they are high impedance arent they ?
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Quick Nav |
|
» Quick Tech |
|
» Market Place |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|