TurboDodge.com MarketPlace Shelby Registry Contact Us

Advertisement - Remove these ads today by clicking here.
 

Go Back   TurboDodge.Com - Turbo Dodge forum for Turbo Mopars, Shelbys, Daytona, SRT-4, PT Cruiser, Omni and more! > Turbo Dodge Technical Chat > Engine - Block

Engine - Block Improving strength and durability - pistons to crank

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools

Old 06-05-2004, 04:07 PM   #1
main and rod bearings - why not ball bearing?  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lakewoood. CO

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 571
Feedback: (0)
The title pretty much sums up the whole of my question.

It ocurred to me earlier this week when talking with another fellow about crankshafts, why not use a ball bearing setup, kind of like those seen in in a transmission or roller skates (for example of course, crank bearings would have to be made to MUCH tighter tollerances). I recall it being stated by someone in a thread about turbochargers that his turbo had a ball bearing, and it spooled sooner as a result. I came up with the idea of rather than have a crank journal on a one peice crank, you would have a multi-piece crank, and where your rods connected to the crank, you have a place where a reverse-thread bolt (or normal thread bolt, depending on direction of crankshaft rotation) which screws through your ball bearing and to the next piece of the crank and then a nut holds it all together. Your bearing bolt could be as big as a crankshaft journal, and if bolts can be made to hold the mains and crank in place for those mega powerful diesels, I think a bolt can be had/found/made for this application. As far as lubricating your bearings goes, unlike roller skate bearings, which have plates on the side of the bearing to prevent anything from getting inside, the balls in the bearing itself would be exposed, and the your oil passeges could be on the sides of the bearing.

Kind of like my titanium crankshaft I idea which I put forth in the thread that was initially about titanium rods (which has been shelved for feasability/cost reasons amongst others). Does anyone else have any data or experience which would help me determine if this is a workable idea or not?
Koreth is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2004, 05:06 PM   #2
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Jacksonville, Fl

My Ride: 88 Dodge Shadow
Engine: T-III Power
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 291
Feedback: (0)
i know they make roller cam bearings for the small block chevy...

supposedly it's worth a very little bit of HP.... however, they're also prone to coming apart, and putting little needle bearings all over. it's been awhile since i've read about them though, so maybe things have changed.

either way.... i dont think they can take the abuse a rod or main bearing takes, which is why you dont see them. however, i have no edivence to back that up. it's just my opinion.
iniviate is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2004, 04:08 PM   #3
 
Boostaholic
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: PirateSwashbucklers.awesome

My Ride: 88 Plymouth Reliant
Engine: 2.5L T2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,768
Feedback: (0)
most roller cranks are pressed together. 70's kawasaki kz motors were roller and so are some snowmobile engines. they still have oil passages like normal but lower oil pressure. the problem is with a roller crank it can twist, messing up the angles and break stuff. a pressed splined crank would be cool though... i wonder if anyone makes something like that.

Brian
Aries_Turbo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2004, 04:23 PM   #4
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: browntown, nj

My Ride: 84 rampage
Engine: 2.2L T3
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 10.850

Posts: 1,062
Feedback: (0)
jet skis and motorcycles all over have pressed cranks/roller bearings. i was curious myself, but always figured it was a cost and durability thing.
Mike Radowski is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2004, 08:18 PM   #5
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba

My Ride: 1987 Daytona Shelby
Engine: 2.5 16v
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 2,205
Feedback: (0)
I believe it's because a crankshaft does not go in a perfect circle while it is inside the bearing, it is slightly oblonged, and if it were pressed in roller bearings it would wear them down getting shavings in and then you'd have excessive crankplay
Garret is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2004, 08:37 PM   #6
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Down back in the shack with the moon in the door

My Ride: 89 Daytona
Engine: 2.5L TII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 696
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Garret
I believe it's because a crankshaft does not go in a perfect circle while it is inside the bearing, it is slightly oblonged, and if it were pressed in roller bearings it would wear them down getting shavings in and then you'd have excessive crankplay
Bingo!
Bad Vibe is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2004, 03:35 PM   #7
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lakewoood. CO

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 571
Feedback: (0)
well darn. It sounded like a cool idea. A man can always dream.
Koreth is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2004, 11:45 PM   #8
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Saskatchawhat? Im starting to not like dodge turbos...

My Ride: 1988 Shelby Z
Engine: 4Banger Turbo 2.2L
1/4: 15.500

Posts: 749
Feedback: (0)
Ive heard that F1 cars use them and they make them for SBCs
ToiboTonaZee is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2004, 04:25 PM   #9
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba

My Ride: 1987 Daytona Shelby
Engine: 2.5 16v
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 2,205
Feedback: (0)
F1 car = incredably short stroke and not very much torque... compared to HP that is

and I'm sure they even make like plastic cranks for SBCs... they make everything for those motors, just if you need one you'll know exactly what you'd need to know to be running it properly if they do make them
Garret is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2004, 04:42 PM   #10
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lakewoood. CO

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 571
Feedback: (0)
Please pardon my ignorance; what is an SBC?
Koreth is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2004, 04:43 PM   #11
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba

My Ride: 1987 Daytona Shelby
Engine: 2.5 16v
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 2,205
Feedback: (0)
SBC = Small Block Chevy
Garret is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2004, 04:45 PM   #12
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lakewoood. CO

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 571
Feedback: (0)
With that now known...

WHY would you want a PLASTIC crank? I know of no plastic that is more durable than metal, save those fiberide wheels for the CSX. Hmm.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Garret
and I'm sure they even make like plastic cranks for SBCs... they make everything for those motors, just if you need one you'll know exactly what you'd need to know to be running it properly if they do make them
Koreth is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

» Quick Nav
- Home
- Classifieds
- Timeslips
- Gallery
- Vendors
-- Directory
- Tech Articles
- Donate
Sponsors
remove ads

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1
Credit Card Shop | Credit Cards | Ringtones | Online Loans | Anime Episodes


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:25 AM.

Page generated in 0.89583 seconds with 13 queries