06-05-2004, 04:07 PM
|
#1
|
  |
|
main and rod bearings - why not ball bearing?
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lakewoood. CO
1/4: 0.000
|
The title pretty much sums up the whole of my question.
It ocurred to me earlier this week when talking with another fellow about crankshafts, why not use a ball bearing setup, kind of like those seen in in a transmission or roller skates (for example of course, crank bearings would have to be made to MUCH tighter tollerances). I recall it being stated by someone in a thread about turbochargers that his turbo had a ball bearing, and it spooled sooner as a result. I came up with the idea of rather than have a crank journal on a one peice crank, you would have a multi-piece crank, and where your rods connected to the crank, you have a place where a reverse-thread bolt (or normal thread bolt, depending on direction of crankshaft rotation) which screws through your ball bearing and to the next piece of the crank and then a nut holds it all together. Your bearing bolt could be as big as a crankshaft journal, and if bolts can be made to hold the mains and crank in place for those mega powerful diesels, I think a bolt can be had/found/made for this application. As far as lubricating your bearings goes, unlike roller skate bearings, which have plates on the side of the bearing to prevent anything from getting inside, the balls in the bearing itself would be exposed, and the your oil passeges could be on the sides of the bearing.
Kind of like my titanium crankshaft I idea which I put forth in the thread that was initially about titanium rods (which has been shelved for feasability/cost reasons amongst others). Does anyone else have any data or experience which would help me determine if this is a workable idea or not?
|
|
|