 |
|
  |
 |
10-09-2005, 10:56 AM
|
#32
|
  |
|
|
|
Boostaholic
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: St. Louis
My Ride: 85 GTS, 3 87 GTS, 89
Engine: 2.2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
Que???
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
10-15-2005, 05:48 PM
|
#35
|
  |
|
|
|
Boostaholic
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary, Alberta
My Ride: 88 DOHC Pacifica
Engine: 2.5L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 14.900
|
 Quote:
|
Originally Posted by packrat_turbo
Has anyone compared these blocks, as far as comparing weights?
If castings in Mexico are so much better, why are so many people illegally crossing the border into the U.S.? It boggles the mind!
|
  |
Maybe they're bring all the good engine blocks with them and marketing the in the US?
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
10-15-2005, 06:09 PM
|
#36
|
  |
|
Re blocks
|
|
Boostaholic
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: St. Louis
My Ride: 85 GTS, 3 87 GTS, 89
Engine: 2.2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
 Quote:
|
Originally Posted by packrat_turbo
Has anyone compared these blocks, as far as comparing weights?
If castings in Mexico are so much better, why are so many people illegally crossing the border into the U.S.? It boggles the mind!
|
  |
nimby. Not in my backyard. Aluminum foundries take a LOT of electric and I assume emit gasses. Canada built a foundry in southern Mo. because of a special cut rate on electric and tax incentives. Mopar had to build in Mexico because US companies don't get the incentives foreign companies do. It is just a more modern plant in Mexico.
If we gave the same breaks to US companies, they wouldn't move overseas so quickly.
Why do the Mixicans still cross the border? They get paid 10% of what Chrysler pays in the US.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
10-17-2005, 11:50 AM
|
#38
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: so. pittsburg tenn.
My Ride: 86 omni glh
Engine: 89 T-2,2.2L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 11.906
|
hey guys ,i have a ? .i have a block in my omni that is a common block 11-90 on the back.but in doesnt have crossdrilled holes!!!! never payed any mind to that when building it ,but had to put a head gasket on it ,&saw it . anybody know what its from ,thanks huey
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
10-17-2005, 05:40 PM
|
#39
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: looking for boost.....somewhere....
My Ride: 94 shadow base coupe
Engine: 2.5 TBI
Induct: N/A
1/4: 0.000
|
stock production turbo blocks came crossdrilled. but for efficiancy's sake chrylser later on just used the same crossdrilled block after around 91 model year. my 94 2.5 TBI has crossdrills in the block AND head.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
10-17-2005, 09:32 PM
|
#40
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: detroit
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
 Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bluneon
stock production turbo blocks came crossdrilled. but for efficiancy's sake chrylser later on just used the same crossdrilled block after around 91 model year. my 94 2.5 TBI has crossdrills in the block AND head.
|
  |
not all stock turbo blocks were cross drilled,i thought the 88 t2s were the first to get the crossdrilled head or block
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
10-24-2005, 12:45 AM
|
#41
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: near Detroit
My Ride: 85 GLH
Engine: 2.2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 12.740
|
The block that I have all machined up has the date code 12 E 94 with out a C, hope this will hold up to some serious power ?!?
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
01-15-2006, 11:58 PM
|
#43
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Spokane, Wa
My Ride: 85 GLHT, 87 ShelbyZ
Engine: 2.2 T2 and 2.5 T2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.882
|
Just picked up a C block today in a 12/88 Lebaron GTS (Hbody) Casting date is 1/8/88.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
01-26-2006, 12:15 PM
|
#44
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
My Ride: 87 omni 89 caravan
Engine: turbo 2.5
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
so has anyone actually had the metal tested to see if it is stronger on the "C" blocks?
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
01-26-2006, 04:16 PM
|
#45
|
  |
|
|
|
Boostaholic
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: St. Louis
My Ride: 85 GTS, 3 87 GTS, 89
Engine: 2.2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
I think it has more to do with the bore location of cylinders. I saw a pic where the head gasket doesn't mate very well to the bores on some blocks. The bores with the old technology are not as precise as the new casting method. This would also affect thin spots in cylinders. Somebody had a post on the new casting method. It said the sand molds are computer made for each pour. Less chance for a bad casting. This should give better uniformity and strength with the same weight or even less.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Quick Nav |
|
» Quick Tech |
|
» Market Place |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|